FYP.
No other President in modern times has been less interested in reaching out to members of the opposite party. Reagan even got Rostenkowski involved in rooting out special interest tax breaks! Clinton achieved welfare reform and a balanced budget working with Gingrich, along with NAFTA ratification. They even had agreed on Social Security reform, although the Lewinski distraction scuttled its enactment. Bush recruited Ted Kennedy (!) to get No Child Left Behind enacted.
Whether you agree with the merits of any of these achievements or not, all of the people involved realized that compromise involved a partial "win" for both sides. We see no sign of that at all from Obama. You offer him something, he then asks for more. That's not how negotiations work with most people. Generally, you offer something to me, I offer something to you in return. Don't see that. Biden (!) did all the negotiating this time.
FYP.
No other President in modern times has been less interested in reaching out to members of the opposite party. Reagan even got Rostenkowski involved in rooting out special interest tax breaks! Clinton achieved welfare reform and a balanced budget working with Gingrich, along with NAFTA ratification. They even had agreed on Social Security reform, although the Lewinski distraction scuttled its enactment. Bush recruited Ted Kennedy (!) to get No Child Left Behind enacted.
Whether you agree with the merits of any of these achievements or not, all of the people involved realized that compromise involved a partial "win" for both sides. We see no sign of that at all from Obama. You offer him something, he then asks for more. That's not how negotiations work with most people. Generally, you offer something to me, I offer something to you in return. Don't see that. Biden (!) did all the negotiating this time.
So the President learns to no longer negotiate with himself, and he's the obstructionist? Christ, McConnell fillibustered his own bill at one point last month.
It's hard not to laugh, except for how sad it really is. It's like a comedy about a really bad government starring Sacha Baron Cohen.
Why hasn't Obama figured out that if he wants something passed all he has to do is come out against it and the Republicans will fall all over themselves to get it through?
Had Boehner not broken the Hastert Rule, we would've gone over the cliff.
...and would have been better off. Those reductions should have taken effect immediately.
And yet, even though I have been a Democratic operative in the past, I still have been able to broker a budget deal that almost everyone here can agree with. Others have as well, it's not like I'm the only one, but if an admitted Democratic operative can come up with a compromise that works and that BOTH sides think is fair, that tells you just how broken Washington is. Unfortunately, "compromise" is a dirty word in DC these days and both sides would either like to wait for a deal where they get EVERYTHING they want or have the issue to use in campaigns.*Obviously, Priceless is still here too but he makes no secret of being an actual employee of the political party, at least in the past. So he's up front about benefiting financially from his politicking, which gives him a sort of excuse.
I actually earn more than just Social Security (which is taxed, BTW) since I had the foresight to purchase an insurance policy in case something like this happened. Fortunately, the insurance policy does not pay out quite $380,000 a year so I avoid having my taxes go up. Phew.Priceless benefits now. He offers to pay your tax bill with your income if you trade.... His income now IS your taxes![]()
The longer we kick the can, the harder the fall will eventually be. The biggest problem with the so-called cliff was that it wasn't high enough. Like it or not, we'll have to pay our bills some day. Yes, it will hurt. It's now unavoidable.
Only if you think a double dip recession is being better off.
How would that have happened?
Not to mention the big drop in government contribution to the economy due to sequestration.Well, when you hike everyone's payroll taxes by 50% and couple that with a big hit on income taxes as well, people will stop spending. That spending is what's keeping this economy going right now.
Generally speaking though, at a national level its better to spread the hurt out than absorb it all at once. Given present interest rates, there's no reason not to kick the can at least somewhat.
Well, when you hike everyone's payroll taxes by 50% and couple that with a big hit on income taxes as well, people will stop spending. That spending is what's keeping this economy going right now.
I actually earn more than just Social Security (which is taxed, BTW) since I had the foresight to purchase an insurance policy in case something like this happened. Fortunately, the insurance policy does not pay out quite $380,000 a year so I avoid having my taxes go up. Phew.
Here's the song that Congress plans to play during their inauguration party:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/2XLVpGvUQs0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Earn.