Re: The 2012 Presidential Election Part I - The guns of August
Horrific problem? There's more actual evidence of global warming and alien visitors than there is voter fraud, but of course voter fraud solutions need to be fast tracked coz it's such a pressing issue.
Blather all you want. Call people names. But don't expect anyone who can actually think for themselves to see this as anything other than voter suppression for political gain.
I mean, even that moron in the Pennsylvania legislature admitted as much, not that we needed anyone to admit it.
And of course, this isn't a wider political strategy by those who pull the puppets' strings. No WAY! It's just a big coincidence that all of those states decided it was a big deal at the same moment in history. Right? Just a coincidence.
Win however you have to. Just don't complain when you get what these people are shooting for. At some point, they won't need your vote anymore and if you aren't rich, they won't need you for anything anymore.
Except to buy their products and services, of course.
How do you go about uncovering illegal voting? Isn't it better to try to stop it before it happens rather than pick up the pieces afterwards? The buried premise here is that any effort to curtail whatever amount of illegal voting that occurs just HAS to be racist. How convenient. Because no effort to "expand the franchise" is ever viewed as what it really is: putting a thumb on the scale.
And sending fraudulently elected people to Congress or the Senate or the State House or the White House may not seem like a big deal to you, but it does to me. Both the fact and the perception that our elections are on the up and up is very important to most Americans, even if it's not to you. Elections where just enough "votes" are "found" at the last minute to tip the outcome are far too frequent.
And you really ought to try to quote me accurately. The "horrific problem" I referred to was UNO fans' comparison of standing in line at the DMV for a couple of hours to get an ID to the Bataan Death March. I was being sarcastic.
Yes, of course, Republican controlled legislatures and Republican governors are trying to put an end to the stealing of elections in big cities. You would hardly expect Democrats, who benefit from watering down the requirements to register (after all, they've been trolling for votes in prisons) to get on board with that effort.
Don't fret about calling names, your side does an excellent job of demonizing anyone who even suggests that maybe voters should prove who they are before they cast a ballot. "Jim Crow," "poll tax," "racist," "voter suppression," and on and on. The typical litany of libs who can't win their argument with facts and resort instead to emotional name calling. And cryptic, conspiratorial references to those who are "pulling the puppets' strings" IMO doesn't strengthen the argument. It just shows libs will say anthing, do anything to avoid having an accurate vote count. One per registered voter. Cast by that voter. No less and certainly no more.
I think plenty of people "who think for themselves" see how desperate Democrats are that their stranglehold on certain precincts in certain cities and the resulting ability to generate huge numbers of votes may be in jeopardy. Your demagoguery doesn't change that.