Re: The 112th Congress - The first Orange-American to be elected Speaker
I can understand you wanting to avoid talking about PP's very checkered history by throwing out some relativistic language. Nice duck.
Another dodge. Again, I don't blame you. It's a pretty grisly history.
??
I raised the issue of PP's very checkered past. Both of them avoided addressing the point I raised. Pretty simple really.
Focus. PP's grisly history. Margaret Sanger. I didn't say anything about them doing anything illegal (though it wouldn't surprise me). I said they have a grisly history. You made some statement about nobody is perfect. Yah, that explains statements like this from Margaret Sanger "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population." Or "The marriage bed is the most degenerating influence in the social order." Or "The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it." Yup, every other interest group is like that.
That was my first post. I brought up a new angle that Priceless and Foxton both dodged. The person who founded and ran PP for much of its early history and who is still highly honored by the organization is certainly germane to how one looks at PP...
And 332,278 abortions in 2009, compared to 997 adoption referrals. That's 333 abortions per adoption referral.
"Those that fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it."
-Winston Churchill
So, Not to inject anything into the sissy fight...I am confused still about what PP is doing related to
corruption. If you are against abortion that is one thing but it is legal and that is not corruption.
I will agree that what Margaret Sanger said in today's culture is not acceptable but in those times there was a lot of that kind of rhetoric from all sides. There certainly was racism, bigotry and all sorts of unChristian behavior, even from the Christians! (and yes, I am one). Popes have done some horrifying things but does that make Christianity null? No, the basis is the belief system. THe PP belief is that women should be given the tools to take care of their bodies. Prevention is the most important part of what they teach.
I understand you are against abortion. I can't say that I disagree with this as I have said before. I ask once again how cutting funding to a place that provides a way to
prevent the need is helping this situation? Do you have stats on just how many ABs could potentially be prevented by all the birth control that is being distributed? How about how many total visits compared to how many ABs were performed? I am pretty sure the ratio would way outdo the stat about adoption vs AB. How about how many referrals to OB for prenatal care?
I know they have all the propaganda nonsense about ABs being pushed. I have to disagree with this. I have had more than a few patients that were rejected because they were not sure they wanted one and wanted to just get it over with. For those who are seeking adoption there are other, well known avenues that are available. I have referred patients to them. PP is not the first place that comes to mind to broker that altho they offer the service.
On the whole I understand that abortion is objectionable. I do not understand why some of what someone said a century ago has bearing on the way the organization is judged today. Margaret Sanger said some horrifying things. Just like we have Glen Beck, Rush, and Oberman now who are way over the line when they say things. She was a wildly radical person in her time and I bet would still be one now.
Despite her nasty side she also was an advocate for women when there were no other advocates and some of the things she advocated for were things that made being a woman more safe. At that time in history women were purposefully kept in the dark about most things to do with sexuality including pregnancy prevention and STDs. Sanger diseminated this information allowing women to protect against pregnancy and STDs in a time when there was very little intervention that could help a woman who was a risk. She may not have had the best moral character but I am sure that at least this is a good thing for women.