What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

The 112th Congress - A Congress divided shall not cry!

Status
Not open for further replies.

joecct

Well-known member
Ok, for the next 2 years (or until 12/21/2012), this Congress, for better or for worse, is it.

Post the usual rants, partisan diatribes, snarky (and snarly) asides, and vital points on what the doings are in the Capitol and other environs.

Special contest. Name the town that will be the first to have it's post office renamed.
 
Re: The 112th Congress - A Congress divided shall not cry!

I'm sure the residents of Everett, Washington, will be enjoying their shiny new Glenn Beck Memorial Post Office shortly.
 
Re: The 112th Congress - A Congress divided shall not cry!

Congratulations to <del>Weeper</del>Speaker of the House John Boehner. A bit of trivia: He's the first orange person to hold such a high position in the government.
 
Re: The 112th Congress - A Congress divided shall not cry!

Congratulations to <del>Weeper</del>Speaker of the House John Boehner. A bit of trivia: He's the first orange person to hold such a high position in the government.

Nice.
 
Re: The 112th Congress - A Congress divided shall not cry!

That took a long time.

GOP bends its own new House rules

Just hours after taking control of the House, Republicans passed a sweeping set of rules promising transparency and reform.

But the new majority is already showing these promises aren’t exactly set in stone.

After calling for bills to go through a regular committee process, the bill that would repeal the health care law will not go through a single committee. Despite promising a more open amendment process for bills, amendments for the health care repeal will be all but shut down. After calling for a strict committee attendance list to be posted online, Republicans backpedaled and ditched that from the rules. They promised constitutional citations for every bill but have yet to add that language to early bills.

Republicans say there are subtle reasons for these moves and that they certainly will follow their own rules throughout the 112th Congress. But the hedging on some promises shows just how hard it will be to always match the sharp rhetoric of the campaign with the ugly and complex work of running the House.

The promise of full debate in committees, for example, was inspired by Republican complaints that Democrats abused their power in bypassing regular debate. Republicans such as Speaker John Boehner, Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Virginia and Rules Chairman David Dreier of California all have complained that Democrats in the last Congress didn’t bring a single bill under a process called the open rule — a mechanism that allows for nearly unlimited amendments and debate. None of the bills that will be brought to the floor this week will be brought under open rules. When asked directly whether he would bring the repeal bill to the floor under an open rule, Cantor dodged the question. "The repeal bill is going to be a very straightforward document,” Cantor said this week. “It is going to reflect what I think most people inside the Beltway and outside the Beltway understand about the health care bill that was passed."

Regarding the failure to put the constitutional citation into bills, Republicans say that typically will come when a bill hits the floor. The three bills that Republicans plan to introduce this week — one to cut the congressional budget, one to repeal the health care bill and another to instruct House committees to present new health care legislation — were posted on the Rules Committee website with plenty of time for review, but none had the constitutional citation for similar review.

More at link.
 
Re: The 112th Congress - A Congress divided shall not cry!

f16034816.jpg
 
Re: The 112th Congress - A Congress divided shall not cry!

It's almost as if you're suggesting they were empty promises that only boobs would have believed... ;)

Wow, the same thing that happened with Obama, I'm shocked it happened all over again
 
Re: The 112th Congress - A Congress divided shall not cry!

Wow, the same thing that happened with Obama, I'm shocked it happened all over again

Amazing, isn't it?

It would be refreshing if someone finally got elected and didn't have to lie to do it.
 
Re: The 112th Congress - A Congress divided shall not cry!

The opposite of "pro" is "con",
That fact is clearly seen.
If "progress" means move forward,
Then what does "congress" mean?
;)
 
Re: The 112th Congress - A Congress divided shall not cry!

The opposite of "pro" is "con",
That fact is clearly seen.
If "progress" means move forward,
Then what does "congress" mean?
;)

Now you smash a watermelon with a sledgehammer, right?

Next, the Congress will read "Pat The Bunny" and "There's a Monster At the End of This Book!" (spoiler: it's Grover).
 
Re: The 112th Congress - A Congress divided shall not cry!

Now you smash a watermelon with a sledgehammer, right?

Next, the Congress will read "Pat The Bunny" and "There's a Monster At the End of This Book!" (spoiler: it's Grover).

GROVER?! Aw dang, and that was going to be read to me tonight... :D

Honestly, I just couldn't fathom seeing myself making a living out of being a politician. Remember back in the day when politicians had actual jobs once they were done with their term?
 
Re: The 112th Congress - A Congress divided shall not cry!

GROVER?! Aw dang, and that was going to be read to me tonight... :D

Honestly, I just couldn't fathom seeing myself making a living out of being a politician. Remember back in the day when politicians had actual jobs once they were done with their term?

No, I don't remember.
 
Re: The 112th Congress - A Congress divided shall not cry!

GROVER?! Aw dang, and that was going to be read to me tonight... :D

Honestly, I just couldn't fathom seeing myself making a living out of being a politician. Remember back in the day when politicians had actual jobs once they were done with their term?
They still do -- lobbyist.
 
Re: The 112th Congress - A Congress divided shall not cry!

Joe Biden, like all good comedians, has a bread and butter joke, and by golly he sticks to it.

<object width="518" height="419"><param name="movie" value="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=hd6USU2GSU" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=hd6USU2GSU" allowfullscreen="true" width="518" height="419" /></object>
 
Re: The 112th Congress - A Congress divided shall not cry!

At least they had a good excuse.

WASHINGTON -- Two House Republicans have cast votes as members of the 112th Congress, but were not sworn in on Wednesday, a violation of the Constitution on the same day that the GOP had the document read from the podium.

The Republicans, incumbent Pete Sessions of Texas and freshman Mike Fitzpatrick, missed the swearing in because they were at a fundraiser in the Capitol Visitors Center. The pair watched the swearing-in on television from the Capitol Visitors Center with their hands raised.

"That wasn't planned. It just worked out that way," said Fitzpatrick at the time, according to local press on hand, which noted that he "happened to be introducing Texas Congressman Pete Sessions while glad-handing his supporters in the Capitol Visitor Center that he secured for them when the House swearing in began."

House ethics rules forbid fundraising in the Capitol.


"Article VI, Paragraph 3: The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."
 
Re: The 112th Congress - A Congress divided shall not cry!

Republicans Introduce Bil to Ban Czars

Also, on the broken promises thing with regard to the health care bill, I agree it was a broken promise, but from a common sense perspective, what amendments could you possibly add to such a bill? You either repeal Obamacare, or you don't.
 
Re: The 112th Congress - A Congress divided shall not cry!

Wow, the same thing that happened with Obama, I'm shocked it happened all over again

But these are supposed to be God Fearin', Real America Listenin' conservatives. You know, the moral fiber of America's backbone... :rolleyes:

And it turns out they're just d-bag opportunists, thumping the tub to avoid getting a real job. That is indeed a surprising development. I'm sure their supporters, having been duped, will rethink their allegiance, because, ya know, TEH CONSTITUTION!!!!111!

Or maybe it was all just about money and power and making sure the donors got their kickbacks...

But now that at least some of the posturing is out of the way, I still think this could be a productive Congress in spite of itself. The very fact that midterm Congresses rarely address anything important because of the upcoming Pres election will help, since it's much easier to produce useful compromises when tinkering rather than pouring foundations.

The House will probably waste about half of its (and our) time pursuing the sort of dullard gamesmanship that keeps hate radio riled up, but the other half maybe they'll let the smart people among them (the staffers) actually do some good.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top