Re: St. Cloud to NCHC
Oh, I definitely have that fear of cellar-dwelling and 500 fans in the stands... yikes. But CC already runs its program in the red. They can support it, and they do support it, they just don't expect it to make a lot of money. The schools I think might fold are the ones that both can't make money and can't support it otherwise. Nobody ever said a program had to be a revenue-generator to survive, universities have lots of ways to bring in revenue to support things they deem important. In that sense, one-sport schools almost have an advantage. Bowling Green doesn't need hockey as the school's poster child, for marketing, etc. That will never be the case for CC (or DU, even DU in the WAC).
Like I said in the other thread:
CC will have a program as long as they decide to subsidize it, and it will fold the day they decide not to. It's not a moneymaker. I am sure the NCHC conference agreement will be a little more concrete than a vague reference to a "commitment to hockey" - they will force CC to memorialize it.
Earlier you expressed fears that CC would be the cellar-dweller in the NCHC, and that attendance might fall to the point where there weren't a ton of fans going to games. Obviously this would decrease revenue.
Well, if it gets to a point where they have to fold. Screw 'em.
Now you're saying that CC shouldn't fold because DU and CC need each other. Which is it? Screw the schools that can't support hockey, or schools should help each other out?
Oh, I definitely have that fear of cellar-dwelling and 500 fans in the stands... yikes. But CC already runs its program in the red. They can support it, and they do support it, they just don't expect it to make a lot of money. The schools I think might fold are the ones that both can't make money and can't support it otherwise. Nobody ever said a program had to be a revenue-generator to survive, universities have lots of ways to bring in revenue to support things they deem important. In that sense, one-sport schools almost have an advantage. Bowling Green doesn't need hockey as the school's poster child, for marketing, etc. That will never be the case for CC (or DU, even DU in the WAC).
Like I said in the other thread:
CC will have a program as long as they decide to subsidize it, and it will fold the day they decide not to. It's not a moneymaker. I am sure the NCHC conference agreement will be a little more concrete than a vague reference to a "commitment to hockey" - they will force CC to memorialize it.
Last edited: