What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Space exploration: Where do we go from here?

Re: Space exploration: Where do we go from here?

Also, saw that unlike *EVERY* previous space mission conducted by NASA, SpaceX has revised the launch sequence (with NASA's blessing).

Liquid fuel is usually loaded into the fuel tanks before the crew is loaded (for crew safety, because of the volatility of the loading process), but they have convinced NASA that it's safe to load the astronauts and then load the fuel, then launch.
 
Re: Space exploration: Where do we go from here?

aparch said:
Technically, instead of NASA spending money to have our US astronauts sent into space in Russia, they're spending money to have our US astronauts sent into space in Florida. It's not in-house anymore.
Click to expand...

What's funny about the Tesla vs Airstream based on your note- they chose this pad specifically for nostalgia- it's where Apollo launched. No technical reason.
 
Re: Space exploration: Where do we go from here?

The feed is Good Morning America-level inane. I wish there was a smart/technical people feed.

TBH, we need that for everything: political, business, sports. There should be a dedicated subscription stream on all media for the top 10%, with different (or no) advertising, different everything. People can listen if they want but we won't slow down for them and we won't tip toe around their myths. If they are lost or bored or angry they can drop down to the gen pop feed.

Separate but equal.
 
Last edited:
Re: Space exploration: Where do we go from here?

A quick timing reminder- while streaming is live right now, and will be on Discovery and Science at 2pm, actual launch time is 4:33 pm. Which gives me some time to go do some more stuff.
 
Re: Space exploration: Where do we go from here?

alfablue said:
What's funny about the Tesla vs Airstream based on your note- they chose this pad specifically for nostalgia- it's where Apollo launched. No technical reason.
Click to expand...

Isn't this the pad NASA leased to SpaceX for all their launches?
 
Re: Space exploration: Where do we go from here?

So here's more of a technical question... In theory, space travel has a pretty specific safety margin built into it, especially for electronics.

And there's no doubt in my mind that this new ship is WAY more advance relative to computers than all previous space ships. Heck, I would not be surprised that this ship has more computing power than all of the previous manned ships combined.

But combining the need of more strict computer and electronics systems and the massive step forward in the actual computers- what's the chance that there's some significant steps forward for normal people?

One thing I would hope for is an increase in coding safety and efficiency. Back to more what it used to be. We use way too much auto generated code these days, which makes the code SO much more bulky than it was even 5 years ago. I would think that much of that would have to be avoided just for safety reasons. But who knows.

For the rest of the computing systems- on the electronics side- have there been any significant advances to make consumer hardware better in the next 5 or so years?

In other words, will Space X help advance society like NASA did?
 
Re: Space exploration: Where do we go from here?

aparch said:
Isn't this the pad NASA leased to SpaceX for all their launches?
Click to expand...

Yes, but SpaceX and Boeing were in competition for the us of that pad. Because Apollo.

I'm sure Bezos was part of that bidding process, too.
 
Re: Space exploration: Where do we go from here?

Speaking of Boeing, is Starliner still a thing? Or have they given up?
 
Re: Space exploration: Where do we go from here?

aparch said:
Speaking of Boeing, is Starliner still a thing? Or have they given up?
Click to expand...

With their commercial airplanes division floundering, and today's announced RIF of 10%, I'd think now's the time to focus on getting as many sweet, sweet gubmint/DoD/NASA contracts as possible. Ain't nobody ordering more of Boeing's functioning airplanes (777X, 787) anytime soon, let alone the MAX.
 
aparch said:
Isn't this the pad NASA leased to SpaceX for all their launches?
Click to expand...

Not quite. SpaceX primarily uses pad 40 for their Falcon 9, unmanned launches. ULA, using their Atlas 5 rocket, uses pad 41. 39-A is set up for Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy flights, but is used sparingly.

https://images.app.goo.gl/mtu5zi842QsFfqx66

That's a really good map outlining who uses what pads. The launch calendar I linked previously gives scheduled pads where known as well.
 
Re: Space exploration: Where do we go from here?

alfablue said:
So here's more of a technical question... In theory, space travel has a pretty specific safety margin built into it, especially for electronics.

And there's no doubt in my mind that this new ship is WAY more advance relative to computers than all previous space ships. Heck, I would not be surprised that this ship has more computing power than all of the previous manned ships combined.

But combining the need of more strict computer and electronics systems and the massive step forward in the actual computers- what's the chance that there's some significant steps forward for normal people?

One thing I would hope for is an increase in coding safety and efficiency. Back to more what it used to be. We use way too much auto generated code these days, which makes the code SO much more bulky than it was even 5 years ago. I would think that much of that would have to be avoided just for safety reasons. But who knows.

For the rest of the computing systems- on the electronics side- have there been any significant advances to make consumer hardware better in the next 5 or so years?

In other words, will Space X help advance society like NASA did?
Click to expand...
I know. :)

Software Safety is not magic or new. We have known how to build safe software for a long, long time, based on practices developed for the nuclear power, defense, aviation, and space industries. They all have their own flavors (e.g. commercial aviation is Do-178C, NASA is NASA-STD-8719.13, military is covered under the Mil-Std-882 which allows the use of the Do-178 methods in many cases, etc). So there are no technical hurdles that would prevent "normal people" from developing their code using these methodologies - they are published, publicly available documents that provide a guide for writing safe code AND testing it properly to *prove* that it is safe. The only hurdle is $$$ - rigor does not come for free.

For commercial/military software, the gold standard is that you need to estimate a full day of a person's effort for every 10 "SLOCs" (source lines of code) that you have. The F-35 fighter, for example, had ~30M SLOCs last I knew, so that's 3 million person-days of effort. At 250 working days per year, that's 12,000 person-years worth of effort. If you want to get it done in 4 years, that means that you need a team of 3,000 software engineers writing and testing your code. By comparison, Google is estimated to be 2B (with a B) SLOCs, so if they wanted to apply the same rigor that aviation does - no problem. It's just going to take a team of 100,000 coders 8 years to put out Google 2.0. Not going to happen - nor should it. I don't need my search engine to be as bug-free as my aircraft flight control system.
 
Re: Space exploration: Where do we go from here?

LynahFan said:
I know. :)

Software Safety is not magic or new. We have known how to build safe software for a long, long time, based on practices developed for the nuclear power, defense, aviation, and space industries. They all have their own flavors (e.g. commercial aviation is Do-178C, NASA is NASA-STD-8719.13, military is covered under the Mil-Std-882 which allows the use of the Do-178 methods in many cases, etc). So there are no technical hurdles that would prevent "normal people" from developing their code using these methodologies - they are published, publicly available documents that provide a guide for writing safe code AND testing it properly to *prove* that it is safe. The only hurdle is $$$ - rigor does not come for free.

For commercial/military software, the gold standard is that you need to estimate a full day of a person's effort for every 10 "SLOCs" (source lines of code) that you have. The F-35 fighter, for example, had ~30M SLOCs last I knew, so that's 3 million person-days of effort. At 250 working days per year, that's 12,000 person-years worth of effort. If you want to get it done in 4 years, that means that you need a team of 3,000 software engineers writing and testing your code. By comparison, Google is estimated to be 2B (with a B) SLOCs, so if they wanted to apply the same rigor that aviation does - no problem. It's just going to take a team of 100,000 coders 8 years to put out Google 2.0. Not going to happen - nor should it. I don't need my search engine to be as bug-free as my aircraft flight control system.
Click to expand...

So then would keeping code lines down to a bare minimum be a good thing? Seems like it would, which should advance how coding has changed over the last decade. At least I hope. I really can't stand the modern autocode.
 
Re: Space exploration: Where do we go from here?

So is any one else thinking that when they launch Bob and Doug, the words are "take off, you hosers?"
 
Re: Space exploration: Where do we go from here?

aparch said:
Also, saw that unlike *EVERY* previous space mission conducted by NASA, SpaceX has revised the launch sequence (with NASA's blessing).

Liquid fuel is usually loaded into the fuel tanks before the crew is loaded (for crew safety, because of the volatility of the loading process), but they have convinced NASA that it's safe to load the astronauts and then load the fuel, then launch.
Click to expand...

This seems like a crazy decision to me. Dynamic situations are almost always more dangerous and difficult to control than storage. I know this is liquid fuel, which is inherently hard to store, but I imagine storing is more easily accomplished than transport.

I'm actually really struggling to think of a scenario where a fluid that is more difficult to store than transport.

The only reason behind this I could think of is there are fewer people exposed as the support crew doesn't also have to climb atop the liquid fuel bomb.
 
Re: Space exploration: Where do we go from here?

Now that we're within 30 of launch the feed is the smart people. It's interesting.

Weather degrading and we may have a scrub.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top