Re: solution to ECAC-West problem?
Excuse me ... the issues in the ECAC West are exactly the same kinds of issues that those discontinued DI programs faced. Did you realize that there are more DIII programs than DI programs, and DIII has added the following programs in recent years - Adrian, Neumann, Manhattanville, Utica, University of New England, Westfield State, Becker, and Morrisville. Lost programs during the same period: Scranton, LVC, and MCLA. That's growth, not shrinkage. In the last three years we have added Becker, UNE, and Westfield. The ECAC West is not in trouble for "hockey reasons" it's what you have cited as "other reasons"
Actually in most of the above examples these programs went belly up from causes that had nothing to do with Hockey. Title 9, and AD's making financial decisions that had nothing to do with on Ice or Hockey.
My point was that Division III hockey is in danger while division I hockey is not.
ACHA is closing the gap with Div III hockey. Hockey in general appeals to a hard core segment of which alum are the die hards. Sadly I believe if ECAC West goes by by that this is a reflection on the bigger picture.
Excuse me ... the issues in the ECAC West are exactly the same kinds of issues that those discontinued DI programs faced. Did you realize that there are more DIII programs than DI programs, and DIII has added the following programs in recent years - Adrian, Neumann, Manhattanville, Utica, University of New England, Westfield State, Becker, and Morrisville. Lost programs during the same period: Scranton, LVC, and MCLA. That's growth, not shrinkage. In the last three years we have added Becker, UNE, and Westfield. The ECAC West is not in trouble for "hockey reasons" it's what you have cited as "other reasons"