Re: SLU 2009-2010 Season
Had there been a penalty shot awarded, someone on SLU still would have had to beat Hoffort, which may have been difficult the way he was playing that night. Non-calls tend to be the rule when it get's late in an NCAA tournament game. Personally I would prefer to see the refs call a game consistently all the way through rather than having two different criteria for what constitutes a penalty depending upon at what point in the game it is. I don't think it's as bad as it used to be, but refs still have trouble overcoming the "I don't want to be the one to decide the game" syndrome.
They were equal partners. Hoffort was incredible for the whole game, but the referee blew a key call at a crucial time. He failed to penalize LSSU for intentionally knocking off the net to prevent an SLU goal at the end of regulation. Even the SI recap of the game mentioned the officiating, saying that SLU should have been awarded a goal or a penalty shot on that play. There were a couple of other non-calls in the third that were big as well.
Had there been a penalty shot awarded, someone on SLU still would have had to beat Hoffort, which may have been difficult the way he was playing that night. Non-calls tend to be the rule when it get's late in an NCAA tournament game. Personally I would prefer to see the refs call a game consistently all the way through rather than having two different criteria for what constitutes a penalty depending upon at what point in the game it is. I don't think it's as bad as it used to be, but refs still have trouble overcoming the "I don't want to be the one to decide the game" syndrome.