What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Should college hockey have more than one timeout?

They often go through games without using their 1 time out - why add two? - also adding a couple more timeouts makes risking a challenge and the possibility of a 2 minute delay of game call meaningless.
I agree that adding more timeouts is unneccessary.

On the challenge bit though: maybe it'd be better if they went straight to delay of game for an unsuccessful challenge, like in the NHL.

Personally, I like that better. Losing a timeout is hardly punitive.
 
Compared to most other sports, the object of hockey is to keep the game moving, as evidenced by being able to change the competitors while the game is underway. One of the pitfalls of college sports is coaches who want to make the game all about them. The less we need to stop games and watch players receive coaching the better.
 
Compared to most other sports, the object of hockey is to keep the game moving, as evidenced by being able to change the competitors while the game is underway. One of the pitfalls of college sports is coaches who want to make the game all about them. The less we need to stop games and watch players receive coaching the better.
They should not blow the whistle if the puck hits the netting behind the goal and above the boards inadvertently.
 
Back
Top