What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Should College Hockey grow? Does it need change?

Re: Should College Hockey grow? Does it need change?

Definitely. Everyone knows that both those schools admit hockey players who submit SAT results of zero with their applications. I saw it right in the NCAA regulations. RPI will probably give you a car and pay someone to take all your tests for you, just like they did with that idiot Joe Juneau. He played in the NHL, you know - his grades must have been faked.

Not to mention the time it took to earn that degree...
 
Re: Should College Hockey grow? Does it need change?

Definitely. Everyone knows that both those schools admit hockey players who submit SAT results of zero with their applications. I saw it right in the NCAA regulations. RPI will probably give you a car and pay someone to take all your tests for you, just like they did with that idiot Joe Juneau. He played in the NHL, you know - his grades must have been faked.

A friend’s wife’s hairdresser’s niece works in the Registrar’s Office and she told me that when they reported his grades, they used the grades of an engineering student!:eek:
 
Re: Should College Hockey grow? Does it need change?

Okay, they started school in 2002, not 1996. That makes 2002 the magic year for denying change to date and change in the future?
BTW: The NCAA lowered the required SAT score for college atletes - and athletic scholarships - to ZERO in 2009. One must pretend that change is inconsequential to buy the nonsense you are peddling.

You can't get a zero.
 
Re: Should College Hockey grow? Does it need change?


The solution to this is to borrow from Ghandi... not so much the whole "lets get ourselves beaten up by the colonialist masters" but rather to start shaming Canadians over this issue.... because this is, very arguably, a very selfish mechanism set up to pool kids to favor their leagues and not to develop talent in the best manner available to the player. Heck, Canada is probably shooting themselves in the developmental foot by limiting opportunities for their players. Canadians with talented young players should be offended by this... and we should be informing them that they should be offended.

I wonder if I we can buy a billboard on the 401 or something.
 
Re: Should College Hockey grow? Does it need change?

Blocksi is right as usual. I can add the following points:

The biggest change in getting more collegians into the NHL is when more ex-college players move into senior management of NHL teams as GMs and Director's of Player Personnel/Scouting. These guys tend to prefer what they know, and will tap their college networks, just as the Major Junior grads who run NHL teams do now in tapping their junior networks.

As for college hockey growth, the biggest tipping point will come when big brand name schools add hockey as a revenue generating sport. Title IX is an issue, but the even bigger one is financial. To do hockey right, you need a few million to start a team and millions more if you don't have a suitable facility. Once you get a big SEC school to add hockey in a big way, I think the other SEC schools will eventually follow for competitive reasons. Likewise for the Pac 10, etc. If I were Paul Kelly, I would be concentrating on those big brand name schools, and showing them the business case of how college hockey can add revenue. Frankly, the NHL should also be looking at helping start these programs to help hockey grow outside the core market.

Title IX is the biggest obstacle for expansion.......Thus it becomes an economic one when you have to finance 2 teams (by whatever definition). This is why you have seen the 3 levels in the club circuit have grown tremendously across the country. At Iowa they were just a d3 club team for many years but have moved up to a d2 and kept their d3 team as well just to give students the opportunity to play hockey. The next 2 questions for them would be can they move further up to d1 varsity and keep their club teams as developmental programs. I mentioned this before on USCHO but the cronie posters didnt want any part of it for discussion.
 
Re: Should College Hockey grow? Does it need change?

Do you suppose RIT or RPI would admit me and grant me a hockey scholarship in the hopes my academic performance will improve?

RIT CANNOT offer hockey scholarships. All aid must be available everyone. Also, if it appears that more aid is going to hockey players, the NCAA will crackdown on them. They just need to look down the road about a half hour to see an example of this in Geneseo and Brockport.
 
Re: Should College Hockey grow? Does it need change?

Title IX is the biggest obstacle for expansion.......Thus it becomes an economic one when you have to finance 2 teams (by whatever definition). This is why you have seen the 3 levels in the club circuit have grown tremendously across the country. At Iowa they were just a d3 club team for many years but have moved up to a d2 and kept their d3 team as well just to give students the opportunity to play hockey. The next 2 questions for them would be can they move further up to d1 varsity and keep their club teams as developmental programs. I mentioned this before on USCHO but the cronie posters didnt want any part of it for discussion.

A lot of us think that your pet project (and in this you, Larry, are just as annoying as Octavius) will be VERY bad for this sport and the teams currently involved. I don't think anybody has any problem with Iowa moving up to varsity status. What everybody has a problem with is your gleeful desire to **** their school. While I don't think mine will be affected... but I think you'd understand if people get upset in regards towards your glee towards something that would substantially harm their school.
 
Last edited:
Re: Should College Hockey grow? Does it need change?

A lot of us think that your pet project (and in this you, Larry, are just as annoying as Octavius) will be VERY bad for this sport and the teams currently involved. I don't think anybody has any problem with Iowa moving up to varsity status. What everybody has a problem with is your gleeful desire to **** their school. While I don't think mine will be affected... but I think you'd understand if people get upset in regards towards your glee towards something that would substantially harm their school.

GLEE, what are you talking about. BTHC wouldnt hurt any school, look whats currently happening on a much larger scale with the Big 12. Yea the conference is going to disintergrate but not the schools, they just realign into new conferences. That has been my point all along. So nothing is going to expand anyway until title IX is modiifed, schools cant afford the start up price and that is why you dont see expansion at the varsity level. Glee... just like everyone thinks that a BTHC would dominate and havent been with Boston College capturing 2 recent national titles. Im not annoying it just some fans dont want to understand change.
 
Last edited:
Re: Should College Hockey grow? Does it need change?

GLEE, what are you talking about. BTHC wouldnt hurt any school, look whats currently happening on a much larger scale with the Big 12. Yea the conference is going to disintergrate but not the schools, they just realign into new conferences. That has been my point all along. So nothing is going to expand anyway until title IX is modiifed, schools cant afford the start up price and that is why you dont see expansion at the varsity level. Glee... just like everyone thinks that a BTHC would dominate and havent been with Boston College capturing 2 recent national titles. Im not annoying it just some fans dont want to understand change.

ok... tell me why it would not be a disadvantage to the midwestern schools who are not part of the big 10.

BTW, have you not seen the meltdown by Bill Self at Kansas? He has a couple of national championships in basketball... why would he be worried if there's no problem?
 
Re: Should College Hockey grow? Does it need change?

ok... tell me why it would not be a disadvantage to the midwestern schools who are not part of the big 10.

BTW, have you not seen the meltdown by Bill Self at Kansas? He has a couple of national championships in basketball... why would he be worried if there's no problem?

Where is the meltdown at Kansas? they can still schedule a tough nonconference schedule and go to the Big Dance. And we are talking about start up teams Kansas has been varsity quite sometime.

Again Title IX has created a financial stagnation for new sports going varsity, it used to take a smaller startup sum maybe these new mega conferences will push some money towards college hockey.
 
Re: Should College Hockey grow? Does it need change?

Again Title IX has created a financial stagnation for new sports going varsity, it used to take a smaller startup sum maybe these new mega conferences will push some money towards college hockey.
No, they won't. They're going to push the extra money to football, so they can make even more money on football...
 
Re: Should College Hockey grow? Does it need change?

No, they won't. They're going to push the extra money to football, so they can make even more money on football...

I used the word "maybe" loosely.

One thing has happened that is good, the private sector has and had to come out and support club hockey. If the NCAA could make an extra effort (somewhere similar to the private sector) for additional revenue in college hockey, not only will the Big-Ten expand hockey across the board would and all these fears of contraction would turn into one hellva postseason tournament.
 
Last edited:
Re: Should College Hockey grow? Does it need change?

Where is the meltdown at Kansas? they can still schedule a tough nonconference schedule and go to the Big Dance. And we are talking about start up teams Kansas has been varsity quite sometime.

Again Title IX has created a financial stagnation for new sports going varsity, it used to take a smaller startup sum maybe these new mega conferences will push some money towards college hockey.

I agree with the problem of Title IX.

You didn't answer the question about the other schools.

http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebasketballnation/post/_/id/12308/kus-self-hopeful-but-frustrated

“Yeah I’m frustrated,’’ he said. “In the end, we’re going to have a home and who knows, it could be even better for us, but there’s a lot of concern. This doesn’t just affect us. This is about alumni, the state, giving, a fan base. The entire landscape of our university is going to change potentially for the next 35 to 50 years. Whether we believe we can compete at a very high level or not, that decision is being made for us.’’

---

He's moderated his comments since... but I'm sure pressure from other sources will do that. If guys like him see a fundamental sea change as harmful then its likely others will as well.

edit: i know we are way off topic now
 
Re: Should College Hockey grow? Does it need change?

"The entire landscape of our university is going to change potentially for the next 35 to 50 years."[/b]

That there is a guy who puts waaaaaay too much emphasis on college athletics and not enough on college academics.


Powers &8^]
 
Re: Should College Hockey grow? Does it need change?

That there is a guy who puts waaaaaay too much emphasis on college athletics and not enough on college academics.


Powers &8^]

UConn wouldn't be what it is today without Jim Calhoun... without him nobody would give a **** about the school and they certainly wouldn't have fed 2 billion dollars to the school over 10 years. Its a lot more important than you think... all the wrong reasons, sure, but that's the reality.
 
Re: Should College Hockey grow? Does it need change?

UConn wouldn't be what it is today without Jim Calhoun... without him nobody would give a **** about the school and they certainly wouldn't have fed 2 billion dollars to the school over 10 years. Its a lot more important than you think... all the wrong reasons, sure, but that's the reality.

Patman is right but so are academics, the funny thing is the mega money has slighted/powered the course a little for quite a few schools
 
Re: Should College Hockey grow? Does it need change?

RIT CANNOT offer hockey scholarships. All aid must be available everyone. Also, if it appears that more aid is going to hockey players, the NCAA will crackdown on them. They just need to look down the road about a half hour to see an example of this in Geneseo and Brockport.

Are you saying there are Division I schools that do NOT give hockey scholarships?
This is outrageous! These schools probably don't even differentiate between athlete and non-athlete scholars, which gives the school a huge advantage recruiting hockey players and clearly incites recruiting violations and academic fraud. Has the NCAA heard about this inequity?
Dang holier-than-thou eggheads!
 
Back
Top