Fighting Sioux 23
New member
Re: SCSU at UND battle for the headshot rule
I'm trying to remember all 6, but I can only think of about 4 right now (Martin hit, the two against Wisconsin, and the CFB against Duluth). The CFB against Duluth was a legit major. You could argue either way about the two against Wisconsin (CFB and the Murray hit), although I think the CFB was a stretch for 5, and the Murray hit was not a major. The Martin Hit could also be argued about, but IMO given the "contact to the head" rules that the WCHA has, it was probably a major. So, 2 of the 4 were legit majors. The other two majors that we had I don't remember, so can't really comment on those.
Zero out of six were deserved. I could see maybe claiming 4 at the most...but saying all 6 were undeserved is just blatantly stupid. And given your history of stupid posts, I'm not all that shocked.
I'm trying to remember all 6, but I can only think of about 4 right now (Martin hit, the two against Wisconsin, and the CFB against Duluth). The CFB against Duluth was a legit major. You could argue either way about the two against Wisconsin (CFB and the Murray hit), although I think the CFB was a stretch for 5, and the Murray hit was not a major. The Martin Hit could also be argued about, but IMO given the "contact to the head" rules that the WCHA has, it was probably a major. So, 2 of the 4 were legit majors. The other two majors that we had I don't remember, so can't really comment on those.