What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

SCOTUS: sponsored by Harlan Crow

FadeToBlack&Gold said:
I've eaten Crunchwraps that were more Supreme.
Click to expand...
sddefault.jpg
 
Oh for fuck's sake.

www.nytimes.com

Supreme Court to Hear Arguments on Trump Plan to End Birthright Citizenship

The Trump administration had asked the justices to lift a nationwide pause on the policy as lower court challenges continue.
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com

The fact that they need to schedule a debate on this tells me at least 4 of the 6 conservatives are on board with this shit, even though it's clear as day unconstitutional.

If they really side with Trump on this, I honestly don't see how it's not the final nail in the coffin. At the least it means there's no more rule of law as currently understood.
 
Last edited:
unofan said:
Oh for fuck's sake.

www.nytimes.com

Supreme Court to Hear Arguments on Trump Plan to End Birthright Citizenship

The Trump administration had asked the justices to lift a nationwide pause on the policy as lower court challenges continue.
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com

The fact that they need to schedule a debate on this tells me at least 4 of the 6 conservatives are on board with this shit, even though it's clear as day unconstitutional.

If they really side with Trump on this, I honestly don't see how it's not the final nail in the coffin. At the least it means there's no more rule of law as currently understood.
Click to expand...
I want everyone to see this post, see who made it, and understand how bad this really is.
 
Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
And yet the North Dakota boys still won’t believe jt

Uno is a male though so they won’t call him hysterical
Click to expand...
Won't believe what, that they agreed to hear the case? I believe it.

I assume that they are hearing it to make their opinions known on a couple of topics -- The complaint Trump is making about the federal judges issuing nationwide injunctions against his actions, because I assume he thinks in some district courts he might find a favorable ear, and second, the issue of what does "and subject to the jurisdiction" mean in the context of being born in the US.

It would seem to me that using ordinary definitions of jurisdiction that persons born here, except maybe someone who is then covered by diplomatic immunity, would be subject to the jurisdiction of the government. If not, what right do they have to round these people up, charge them with any crimes, etc...?
 
Jimjamesak said:
Start putting together exit plans people.
Click to expand...
Already done. The first line of the poem is first they came for the socialists.

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

—Martin Niemöller
Click to expand...
 
@unofan I know you used to like SCOTUSBlog...well it just sold and people are not happy about the buyers.

Ben Mullin (@benmullin.bsky.social)

scoop: @thedispatch , the right-of-center media startup, is acquiring @SCOTUSblog, an early-aughts pioneer of Supreme Court coverage. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/23/business/media/scotusblog-the-dispatch.html
bsky.app bsky.app
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top