What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

SCOTUS, Now with KBJ

Status
Not open for further replies.
Handyman said:
I love that Abortion needs to be left up to the states but guns the states have no right to decide. The logic of this court is so fucked they are making me think like Keith Olbermann. (no not really)
Click to expand...

Really for me. Fuck these people and their fucking stupidity.
 
Handyman said:
I love that Abortion needs to be left up to the states but guns the states have no right to decide. The logic of this court is so fucked they are making me think like Keith Olbermann. (no not really)
Click to expand...

I mean one is protected by the constitution and one isn’t.

It seems odd that soon after men can become pregnant Roe V Wade gets overturned. Does anyone else find that suspicious?
 
unofan said:
Alito says it applies only to abortion and does not impact other similar cases like birth control/gay marriage/etc.

Thomas agrees here since no one asked for a complete reversal of substantive due process but explicitly invites challenges to the rest.

Kavanaugh says none of the other rights are called into question, and he specifically says travel to other states for an abortion must be allowed.
Click to expand...

And they also told us they would respect precedent. How did that work out for us?
 
French Rage said:
And they also told us they would respect precedent. How did that work out for us?
Click to expand...

Well that is why they brought up Brown...as an excuse for why precedent isn't always binding. If courts were to always respect precedent Plessy would still be the law of the land. (and hey, it could be again if they play their cards right!)

Not defending their ridiculousness but they aren't wrong in that regard.
 
French Rage said:
And they also told us they would respect precedent. How did that work out for us?
Click to expand...

I'll believe what little rights I have aren't in question when unicorns fly out of my nose.

Until then, I know where the tactical firearms store is in Kent County and I will have to pay a visit.

The pussy hat was cute and all, but maybe it's time for all women to start throwing bricks.
 
MissThundercat said:
I'll believe what little rights I have aren't in question when unicorns fly out of my nose.

Until then, I know where the tactical firearms store is in Kent County and I will have to pay a visit.

The ***** hat was cute and all, but maybe it's time for all women to start throwing bricks.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't trust this court to uphold a woman's right to drive a car. LGBTQ+ even worse.

This is going to get ugly, and I fear this country was shoved past the Rubicon now...
 
Handyman said:
I wouldn't trust this court to uphold a woman's right to drive a car. LGBTQ+ even worse.

This is going to get ugly, and I fear this country was shoved past the Rubicon now...
Click to expand...
We’re barreling towards a second civil war and a second constitutional convention, who wins and who writes it is the only question.
 
Jimjamesak said:
We’re barreling towards a second civil war and a second constitutional convention, who wins and who writes it is the only question.
Click to expand...

Saw this take on Twitter yesterday and strongly disagree with it. I don’t see it benefiting either side and how would the country even separate? The northeast is regarded as fairly liberal but the part of it that has all the liberal votes is pretty small area wise.
 
Kepler said:
Coming soon: a federal anti-abortion law.

Until then nobody with an IQ over 90 will want to live in a red state. Only those forced to by circumstances or accidents will remain.
Click to expand...

Exactly. Get out NOW. LA, MO, and a few others are now, effective immediately, completely banning abortion per orders from their AGs.
 
Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
I mean, I don’t want that but if conservatives are going to make over half the citizens here lose their rights, then something has to be done
Click to expand...
We can already see it brewing here with MissT’s response. Marginalized groups are going to do what is necessary to protect themselves, and in this country that means guns.

Eventually the Christofascists are going to either hit enough roadblocks that a constitutional convention is their only means of victory or they’ll have enough power they’ll want to enshrine it forever.

It’s going to be bloody and awful, the only question is how long until a nuke gets set off?
 
Just got a fundraising text from the Dems. Not really in great taste to be trying to drum up donations off this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top