What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Other Republicans...yes. Trump no. But even if I did the second I saw what it truly was I would be out. I am not selling my soul for a job.

Trump and his cronies dont hide what they are. There is no excuse. This is not a case of "joining the Klan because they control the machine" this is going against what the job stands for for political gain. That isnt me. Otherwise I am no better than the GOPers in Congress who go against everything they stand for because Trump has the power they want.

Yep. You don’t need to scrutinize a Trump political nominee for his or her positions. The first quality to scrutinize would be whether or not they show good judgment. That’s a definite ‘no’ if they accepted a political job in his admin.

Any other republican and you can at least check ‘maybe’ on the judgment question.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

shame on the senate and republicans

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">And Max Stier is no slouch of a witness- he is a Rhodes Scholar, Stanford Law grad, fmr. Supreme Court Clerk, runs a bipartisan center for public service and is the star of Michael Lewis’ last book. <a href="https://t.co/UZYKtUNBEQ">https://t.co/UZYKtUNBEQ</a></p>— Jane Mayer (@JaneMayerNYer) <a href="https://twitter.com/JaneMayerNYer/status/1173204905533853703?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 15, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

The NYT is having a(nother) bad 24 hours

Read the replies. It’s no bueno.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">We deleted a previous tweet regarding this article. It was offensive, and we apologize. <a href="https://t.co/gbUdweKbDg">https://t.co/gbUdweKbDg</a></p>— New York Times Opinion (@nytopinion) <a href="https://twitter.com/nytopinion/status/1173067643487760385?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 15, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Omg
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

My god. I only saw the ‘pen-s’ headline. I didn’t see this one.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Side note: “New Sexual Assault Uncovered While Investigating Supreme Court Justice Already Accused of Sexual Assault” might be a better way to frame this story than “Young Woman Didn’t Fit In at Yale” <a href="https://t.co/Dm0E0Cf7bE">https://t.co/Dm0E0Cf7bE</a></p>— Ken Tremendous (@KenTremendous) <a href="https://twitter.com/KenTremendous/status/1173223039238070272?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 15, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

To think, I almost subscribed to this fish wrap.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

I know I am shocked the NYTimes did this. And by shocked I mean...shocked it wasnt Maggie Haberman doing it ;)

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Brett Kavanaugh liked to pull his pants down at Yale and force women to touch him. When Deborah Ramirez gave the FBI a list of 25 people to corroborate her experience, none were interviewed even though some tried in vain to reach the FBI on their own. <a href="https://t.co/dIRNtjSKgQ">https://t.co/dIRNtjSKgQ</a></p>— Amee Vanderpool (@girlsreallyrule) <a href="https://twitter.com/girlsreallyrule/status/1173055682335186944?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 15, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Does the FBI understand what the "I" is in their name?

BTW the Times had to delete two tweets because they are just that stupid.
 
Last edited:
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Unbelievable you are still burying the lede. <a href="https://t.co/PYgp31dG1n">pic.twitter.com/PYgp31dG1n</a></p>— KND 🆘 (@KNDmex) <a href="https://twitter.com/KNDmex/status/1173071077360230400?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 15, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Seriously...the FBI was handed an open and shut case and refused to even try. Hey Rosenstein...you know what happens to collaborators when the Fuhrer falls right?
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

I really hope someone tracks down who paid off his debts. Impeach this mother effer
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Also fixed the article’s headline, my brothers and sisters. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BrettKavanaugh?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BrettKavanaugh</a> <a href="https://t.co/q085WVJKgG">pic.twitter.com/q085WVJKgG</a></p>— Jesus Fix This Headline (@FixItJesus1) <a href="https://twitter.com/FixItJesus1/status/1173200178691465218?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 15, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Maybe Susan Collins can go talk to him again and assure the nation (after getting her hair done so she looks nice on camera!) that Kavanaugh is a good dude who would do nothing of the sort.

If only we have a federal investigative bureau who could be tasked with looking into such allegations. They dont even need to leave their offices people seem to be wanting to talk to them. One day maybe we will have something of the sort...
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

I know I am shocked the NYTimes did this. And by shocked I mean...shocked it wasnt Maggie Haberman doing it ;)

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Brett Kavanaugh liked to pull his pants down at Yale and force women to touch him. When Deborah Ramirez gave the FBI a list of 25 people to corroborate her experience, none were interviewed even though some tried in vain to reach the FBI on their own. <a href="https://t.co/dIRNtjSKgQ">https://t.co/dIRNtjSKgQ</a></p>— Amee Vanderpool (@girlsreallyrule) <a href="https://twitter.com/girlsreallyrule/status/1173055682335186944?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 15, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Does the FBI understand what the "I" is in their name?

BTW the Times had to delete two tweets because they are just that stupid.

Can't investigate when your boss won't let you.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Sue them for liable!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Liable <a href="https://t.co/nln5X7UaRx">pic.twitter.com/nln5X7UaRx</a></p>— Seth Cotlar (@SethCotlar) <a href="https://twitter.com/SethCotlar/status/1173220274910547974?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 15, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Sue them for liable!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Liable <a href="https://t.co/nln5X7UaRx">pic.twitter.com/nln5X7UaRx</a></p>— Seth Cotlar (@SethCotlar) <a href="https://twitter.com/SethCotlar/status/1173220274910547974?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 15, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Someone needs to compile a summary of the days when Trump did not say something that was either a flat out lie or incredibly stupid.

Something for Rs to hold on to heading to next fall. Who knows, he might add a day or two, making their case even better.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Can't investigate when your boss won't let you.

People with less power defy their bosses every day. Their job is to find the truth not follow orders.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

The influencing of his opinions happened when Kennedy stepped down, he has no explanation for his financial statements, and the republican senate and White House made sure as much as possible stayed hidden
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Putting this here as Handy has already mentioned the honorable Maggie H. This is brilliant , reply to Sarah’s tweet about guns being a right given by god

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="und" dir="ltr"> <a href="https://t.co/5iwEPkbLrE">pic.twitter.com/5iwEPkbLrE</a></p>— Jenaw1n (@Jenasummerlin) <a href="https://twitter.com/Jenasummerlin/status/1172916273128206336?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 14, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

"The Justice Department should come to his rescue," says guy who totally understands how these things work.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

What could “justice department coming to his rescue” even possibly mean? They send FBI SWAT teams to take out K’s critics?
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

"The Justice Department should come to his rescue," says guy who totally understands how these things work.

Sure he does...notice how everyone seems to do what he says. The FBI, despite supposedly rigging the election for Hillary, has basically decided what he and his cronies say goes.

The rules no longer apply...they all do what he says. See also: The Senate, DHS...etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top