What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Status
Not open for further replies.
On the Kim Davis note, the administration has filed legal briefs asking SCOTUS to discriminate on sexual orientation and being transgender.

This is the lawyer in me, but that's not 100% accurate. They're not asking for SCOTUS to discriminate, they're asking SCOTUS to say that the provisions of the federal civil rights act which bars gender discrimination does not cover sexual orientation or gender identity.

Honestly, it's always been an awkward workaround given that most states which cover sexual orientation and gender identity do so explicitly, so the fact that federally you have to stretch the limits of definition of gender to encompass those categories by saying it's effectively discriminating based on gender norms has always been a bit of a reach.

The simple fix would just be for Congress to add those categories explicitly to the federal law. But yes, I know, good luck getting that through Moscow Mitch and the Republican Senate.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

John Roberts is having a bad morning. 5 US Senators file an Amicus brief explicitly accusing the Supreme Court of being biased towards corporate interests.

The waylaying of American democracy was supposed to happen in quiet rooms!
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

And it will amount to nothing. I doubt he even noticed it let alone is bothered by it.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

And it will amount to nothing. I doubt he even noticed it let alone is bothered by it.

My favorite part is to reinforce their argument they quoted his own dissent in Obergefell.

It matters to this extent: Roberts, like Scalia, likes to kid himself that he's not a stooge. This demonstrates to the world that we're not buying it. Everybody knows Kavanaugh, Thomas, and Alito are jokes, but Roberts and Gorsuch think of themselves as real jurists. To be called on their bullsh-t so publicly has to sting.
 
Last edited:
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

John Roberts is having a bad morning. 5 US Senators file an Amicus brief explicitly accusing the Supreme Court of being biased towards corporate interests.

The waylaying of American democracy was supposed to happen in quiet rooms!

Wasn’t this from several weeks ago?

I’m not sure this is the best way to go about it.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Wasn’t this from several weeks ago?

I’m not sure this is the best way to go about it.

I think it's a fantastic way to go about it.


My favorite part is to reinforce their argument they quoted his own dissent in Obergefell.

It matters to this extent: Roberts, like Scalia, likes to kid himself that he's not a stooge. This demonstrates to the world that we're not buying it. Everybody knows Kavanaugh, Thomas, and Alito are jokes, but Roberts and Gorsuch think of themselves as real jurists. To be called on their bullsh-t so publicly has to sting.

^^^^^^
 
Last edited:
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

What’s the point of filing this as a brief instead of a floor speech
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

What’s the point of filing this as a brief instead of a floor speech

Legal standing? Impact? I assume an amicus brief carries more weight than a simple speech on the Senate floor.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

My favorite part is to reinforce their argument they quoted his own dissent in Obergefell.

It matters to this extent: Roberts, like Scalia, likes to kid himself that he's not a stooge. This demonstrates to the world that we're not buying it. Everybody knows Kavanaugh, Thomas, and Alito are jokes, but Roberts and Gorsuch think of themselves as real jurists. To be called on their bullsh-t so publicly has to sting.

Congrats...want a cookie?

This means nothing, it says nothing, and 90% of the country (99% of the world) has no idea it even happened. It is just another way for the Left to pat themselves on the back after already losing. Reminds of the good ole days around here when the Red Sux fans would see the Yankees win the WS but talk about how they lead the division for more days. Woohoo...
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

So basically, to own the knucks. *shrug*

Yes. It doesnt even really do that though because "owning the Libs" at least riles up the Libs. Roberts probably rolled his eyes and laughed as he ignored it. But boy is the Left proud of themselves THEY REALLY SHOWED HIM!!!

This ranks up there with getting Trump's taxes. It is pointless and has zero teeth to fix anything.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Yes. It doesnt even really do that though because "owning the Libs" at least riles up the Libs. Roberts probably rolled his eyes and laughed as he ignored it. But boy is the Left proud of themselves THEY REALLY SHOWED HIM!!!

This ranks up there with getting Trump's taxes. It is pointless and has zero teeth to fix anything.

This is exactly what I was thinking.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Owning the libs doesn't always rile the libs. It usually implies either dumb sh*t knucks say and do because they think it pi55es us off (while we just laugh at them) , or stuff that actually does pi55 off the libs and that they will eventually regret when demographics finally catch up to them and we're back in power. Like asking for a cheeseburger at an Indian restaurant, or "rollin' coal" in your F350. Or confirming rabidly partisan and self-disqualifying SCOTUS Justices, and nuking the Senate filibuster.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Libs can't help themselves they always get riled up...that is the sole reason they are on Twitter. Libs thrive on being outraged.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

So basically, to own the knucks. *shrug*

Roberts is worried about how he looks in the history books. The Dems don't care. Own who? Sorry, if you can't put anything on the record and do it the right way and still get Handy's want a cookie remark then you may as well not do anything. Perfect for the Dems cause they rock at that. Meanwhile the knucks ALWAYS do something. ALWAYS.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Libs can't help themselves they always get riled up...that is the sole reason they are on Twitter. Libs thrive on being outraged.

You must have been asleep through the tea party. The Right OWNS the outrage meter. Libs are tame by comparison.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Roberts is worried about how he looks in the history books. The Dems don't care. Own who? Sorry, if you can't put anything on the record and do it the right way and still get Handy's want a cookie remark then you may as well not do anything. Perfect for the Dems cause they rock at that. Meanwhile the knucks ALWAYS do something. ALWAYS.

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/uber/id368677368
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Roberts is worried about how he looks in the history books. The Dems don't care. Own who? Sorry, if you can't put anything on the record and do it the right way and still get Handy's want a cookie remark then you may as well not do anything. Perfect for the Dems cause they rock at that. Meanwhile the knucks ALWAYS do something. ALWAYS.

So what has changed? Other than saying "we put it on the record" how has anything been affected? It hasnt. This is a bunch of people pretending they did something important when they did nothing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top