What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

unofan said:
Sotomeyer due to her "wise Latina" comment.
Click to expand...

You mean the one the Republicans forced to release every single page of her work document history? Over 400,000 pages? That one?
 
ScoobyDoo said:
Vote is scheduled for Friday. That means Flake, Collin, and Murkowski have already caved. Also heard that they won't tell us the prosecutor's name they're going to have do the questioning for her "safety".

Full Senate vote Tuesday. Committee Friday.
Click to expand...

These people make me ill...
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

A lot of folks here sound just like the people up in arms over Hillary's email, just saying.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Drew S. said:
A lot of folks here sound just like the people up in arms over Hillary's email, just saying.
Click to expand...

EMAILZ! and BENGHAZI! still cycling in your mind, eh, Drew. Gives you a blinding headache.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Handyman said:
And you sound like a moron with a twelve iq. Just saying.
Click to expand...

I think Drew gets some sort of perverse pleasure from people calling him stupid. Why he keeps coming back for more.

I guess stroking his gun barrel doesn't do it like it used to.
 
dxmnkd316 said:
I was just going to say the same thing
Click to expand...

This is the usual partisan nonsense. The fact people are analyzing his yearbook shows how absurd the whole thing is. Hasn’t he passed something like seven background checks(they’re not easy to pass as I’m sure a lot of people in the Trump administration have found out)? That should mean much more than some random accusation 35 years after the fact with no corroborating evidence.

I get that people don’t like his politics, but by any objective measure he is quite qualified to be on the court.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Drew S. said:
This is the usual partisan nonsense. The fact people are analyzing his yearbook shows how absurd the whole thing is. Hasn’t he passed something like seven background checks(they’re not easy to pass as I’m sure a lot of people in the Trump administration have found out)? That should mean much more than some random accusation 35 years after the fact with no corroborating evidence.

I get that people don’t like his politics, but by any objective measure he is quite qualified to be on the court.
Click to expand...

Uh, huh. Rape has never been covered up or unreported. EVER. It's never happened. And if he did this at 17 he's most certainly qualified for the Supreme Court. Nothing to see here folks. After all. Boys will be boys.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Drew S. said:
This is the usual partisan nonsense. The fact people are analyzing his yearbook shows how absurd the whole thing is. Hasn’t he passed something like seven background checks(they’re not easy to pass as I’m sure a lot of people in the Trump administration have found out)? That should mean much more than some random accusation 35 years after the fact with no corroborating evidence.

I get that people don’t like his politics, but by any objective measure he is quite qualified to be on the court.
Click to expand...

And if he lies about sexual assault?
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Drew S. said:
This is the usual partisan nonsense. The fact people are analyzing his yearbook shows how absurd the whole thing is. Hasn’t he passed something like seven background checks(they’re not easy to pass as I’m sure a lot of people in the Trump administration have found out)? That should mean much more than some random accusation 35 years after the fact with no corroborating evidence.

I get that people don’t like his politics, but by any objective measure he is quite qualified to be on the court.
Click to expand...

And the fact that the background checks don’t check for unreported sexual assaults?
 
Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
Shh. He’s rolling.
He KNOWS Hillary is guilty of crimes, Brett is being smeared
Click to expand...

LOL, my point was that both cases are partisan nonsense from the other side. I doubt either of them is guilty of very much. The same people who think the Hillary stuff is garbage are all ready to throw Kavanaugh in jail.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Drew S. said:
This is the usual partisan nonsense. The fact people are analyzing his yearbook shows how absurd the whole thing is. Hasn’t he passed something like seven background checks(they’re not easy to pass as I’m sure a lot of people in the Trump administration have found out)? That should mean much more than some random accusation 35 years after the fact with no corroborating evidence.

I get that people don’t like his politics, but by any objective measure he is quite qualified to be on the court.
Click to expand...

You think this is about his politics? You really are an effin moron. Notice we didnt say any of this stuff about Gorsuch?

This isnt about politics...this is about what he allegedly did to women. I know you are willfully ignorant but if you happen to know a woman you might want to start acting like they matter more than the gun you fellate at night.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Drew S. said:
LOL, my point was that both cases are partisan nonsense from the other side. I doubt either of them is guilty of very much. The same people who think the Hillary stuff is garbage are all ready to throw Kavanaugh in jail.
Click to expand...

No we arent troglodyte. We want it investigated. If he is innocent we will let it go (unlike your ilk) but your side wont even allow for meaningful investigation. I wonder why.

You probably think the Catholic Church got railroaded too...
 
Handyman said:
No we arent troglodyte. We want it investigated. If he is innocent we will let it go (unlike your ilk) but your side wont even allow for meaningful investigation. I wonder why.

You probably think the Catholic Church got railroaded too...
Click to expand...

What evidence do you expect them to find that will resolve it? I guess someone can investigate, but not sure what good it will do.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Handyman said:
You think this is about his politics? You really are an effin moron. Notice we didnt say any of this stuff about Gorsuch?

This isnt about politics...this is about what he allegedly did to women. I know you are willfully ignorant but if you happen to know a woman you might want to start acting like they matter more than the gun you fellate at night.
Click to expand...

That’s the thing that should put a wooden stake through the heart of this vast left wing conspiracy nonsense.

Gorsuch was reluctantly supported or at least didn’t get this kind of backlash because he was eminently qualifies for the position. With his credentials, demeanor, and stature. I may have disagreed with virtually all of his opinions but I thought he was qualified and he wasn’t an elitist who thinks women are on this earth for his sexual pleasure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top