trixR4kids
Well-known member
Then why aren’t they letting the FBI exonerate him? Why are they in such a hurry to push it through?
No corroborating evidence? LMFAO
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
- Thread starter Handyman
- Start date
- Status
No corroborating evidence? LMFAO
Slap Shot
I got nothing
Talk about pure BS as it pertains to his statement.
aparch
Acetaminamerican
Just admit it, Garland wasn't supported because the ****** nominated him.
Garland received praise from both sides of the aisle his whole life, but because Obama nominated him, all of a sudden the GOP had to hate him.
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
He received praise earlier that year from the Right. They were saying Obama should nominate someone like him instead of a hardcore liberal. Then he did and they wouldnt even have a hearing for him. But Kavanomeansyes they have to rubberstamp.
He received praise earlier that year from the Right. They were saying Obama should nominate someone like him instead of a hardcore liberal. Then he did and they wouldnt even have a hearing for him. But Kavanomeansyes they have to rubberstamp.
FlagDUDE08
Banned
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
To quote Monty Python and the Holy Grail: "GET ON WITH IT!" https://www.infowars.com/grassley-schedules-kavanaugh-vote-for-friday-morning/
To quote Monty Python and the Holy Grail: "GET ON WITH IT!" https://www.infowars.com/grassley-schedules-kavanaugh-vote-for-friday-morning/
Wisko McBadgerton
Teaching you how to Bucky.
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
While this is all pretty irrelevant to the larger picture I'm still confused about it. Here's what you said:
I don't get it because I'm pretty sure the drinking age in MN was 19 from the mid 70's until the mid 80's when it was raised to 21. Those 19 by the day it went to 21 were grandfathered in. This fact obviously doesn't jive with what you are saying about missing being grandfathered for 18. Either you missed being grandfathered at 18 when it went to 19, in which case the drinking age was 18 or 19, not 21 while you were in HS, or you missed being grandfathered for 21, in which case you were just turning 19, (presumably) weren't in HS, have no experience with alcohol ever being legal for HS students, and the drinking age was still in fact 19 when you were in HS. So in no case that I can see, despite you having had the conversation frequently, could the drinking age have been 21 when you were in HS. Were you just drunk when these conversations took place?
My experience was that 18 was the drinking age, which is a huge difference from 19 or 21. HS Seniors of age could buy alcohol legally. They'd go out for lunch and beers and come back to school, They would meet at bars after school, and they would buy the alcohol for the parties. People are shocked now, but my HS paid for all the kegs at Senior Baccalaureate where parents, teachers, and students all got plowed together on the school's dime. It was a completely different world and culture as it pertains to HS students and drinking than it became even just a few years later. Since my experience is similar to Kavanaugh's, at least through his junior year in MD, and given that 18 year olds could still legally buy alcohol just 4 miles from campus in DC his senior year, I really have no problem with what he said about the drinking age and would say the same thing myself. As irrelevant as it is.
While this is all pretty irrelevant to the larger picture I'm still confused about it. Here's what you said:
I don't get it because I'm pretty sure the drinking age in MN was 19 from the mid 70's until the mid 80's when it was raised to 21. Those 19 by the day it went to 21 were grandfathered in. This fact obviously doesn't jive with what you are saying about missing being grandfathered for 18. Either you missed being grandfathered at 18 when it went to 19, in which case the drinking age was 18 or 19, not 21 while you were in HS, or you missed being grandfathered for 21, in which case you were just turning 19, (presumably) weren't in HS, have no experience with alcohol ever being legal for HS students, and the drinking age was still in fact 19 when you were in HS. So in no case that I can see, despite you having had the conversation frequently, could the drinking age have been 21 when you were in HS. Were you just drunk when these conversations took place?
My experience was that 18 was the drinking age, which is a huge difference from 19 or 21. HS Seniors of age could buy alcohol legally. They'd go out for lunch and beers and come back to school, They would meet at bars after school, and they would buy the alcohol for the parties. People are shocked now, but my HS paid for all the kegs at Senior Baccalaureate where parents, teachers, and students all got plowed together on the school's dime. It was a completely different world and culture as it pertains to HS students and drinking than it became even just a few years later. Since my experience is similar to Kavanaugh's, at least through his junior year in MD, and given that 18 year olds could still legally buy alcohol just 4 miles from campus in DC his senior year, I really have no problem with what he said about the drinking age and would say the same thing myself. As irrelevant as it is.
rufus
rock and roller
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
Who knows? But they won't find anything if they won't look. Which is just fine with you and all your Republican friends, and your representatives in Congress.
Who knows? But they won't find anything if they won't look. Which is just fine with you and all your Republican friends, and your representatives in Congress.
rufus
rock and roller
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
Garland wasn't even given a hearing. Wasn't even considered. At least Kavanaugh has gotten that.
But yeah, just Democrats, smearing and stonewalling. Christ, you're an imbecile.
Garland wasn't even given a hearing. Wasn't even considered. At least Kavanaugh has gotten that.
But yeah, just Democrats, smearing and stonewalling. Christ, you're an imbecile.
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
He compared it to Hillary and the Email investigation. Last time I checked the FBI investigated that. Yet, the Republican ****tards won't allow the FBI to investigate this by demanding the White House to reopen the background check.
**** Republicans and **** this country.
He compared it to Hillary and the Email investigation. Last time I checked the FBI investigated that. Yet, the Republican ****tards won't allow the FBI to investigate this by demanding the White House to reopen the background check.
**** Republicans and **** this country.
rufus
rock and roller
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
But at least we may find out the truth about what kind of man he really is.
You're right, whatever is discovered, republicans will still vote to confirm him anyway. Just another symptom that is the sickness of today's Republican party.
But at least we may find out the truth about what kind of man he really is.
You're right, whatever is discovered, republicans will still vote to confirm him anyway. Just another symptom that is the sickness of today's Republican party.
rufus
rock and roller
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
How many investigations into that again? And we can't even look into these allegations against Kavanaugh? I mean, if I was accused of something like this, and I knew I was innocent, I'd welcome any and every investigation. Be begging for it, actually.
How many investigations into that again? And we can't even look into these allegations against Kavanaugh? I mean, if I was accused of something like this, and I knew I was innocent, I'd welcome any and every investigation. Be begging for it, actually.
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
How many investigations into Benghazi? Yes, 4 people died but it's not like they can come back to life. This is a LIFETIME Appt. to the Highest Court in the Land. An equal branch of government that has only 3 branches.
How many investigations into Benghazi? Yes, 4 people died but it's not like they can come back to life. This is a LIFETIME Appt. to the Highest Court in the Land. An equal branch of government that has only 3 branches.
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">JUST IN: Trump: GOP should've pushed Kavanaugh through "weeks ago" <a href="https://t.co/bVhdt3pzXO">https://t.co/bVhdt3pzXO</a> <a href="https://t.co/sgVkbmNuQe">pic.twitter.com/sgVkbmNuQe</a></p>— The Hill (@thehill) <a href="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1044944703832117248?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 26, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">JUST IN: Trump: GOP should've pushed Kavanaugh through "weeks ago" <a href="https://t.co/bVhdt3pzXO">https://t.co/bVhdt3pzXO</a> <a href="https://t.co/sgVkbmNuQe">pic.twitter.com/sgVkbmNuQe</a></p>— The Hill (@thehill) <a href="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1044944703832117248?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 26, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Can we agree that democrats investigating a republican is good and republicans investigating a democrat is bad?
ScoobyDoo
NPC
unofan
Well-known member
Can we agree you're rivaling Flaggy for village idiot?
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
Well, yeah, duh. Turtle Boy blew it. Not Trump's fault for picking him.
Well, yeah, duh. Turtle Boy blew it. Not Trump's fault for picking him.
rufus
rock and roller
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
No.
Can we agree that Democrats investigating Republicans, and Republicans investigating Democrats on made-up controversies is bad?
Can we agree that the FBI investigating anyone is good?
How ****ing stupid are you, anyway? Can you even breathe by yourself?
No.
Can we agree that Democrats investigating Republicans, and Republicans investigating Democrats on made-up controversies is bad?
Can we agree that the FBI investigating anyone is good?
How ****ing stupid are you, anyway? Can you even breathe by yourself?
rufus
rock and roller
Again, how do you prove or disprove this? The FBI can offer some sort of subjective opinion, but how much value is there in that? We’re never going to know either way what happened.
- Status