What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Yup. <a href="https://twitter.com/Patbagley?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Patbagley</a> already did the cartoon: <a href="https://t.co/UWEeqayiyO">pic.twitter.com/UWEeqayiyO</a></p>— Cary Whitman&#55357;&#56900; (@Cary_wh) <a href="https://twitter.com/Cary_wh/status/1044779118519189504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 26, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Drew S. said:
This isn’t an episode of law & order no matter how much you wish it was. They can do all of those things and at best they will offer a subjective opinion. Given how political this has become you can bet your bottom dollar they will sit on the fence as much as possible.
Click to expand...
So then why won't they do all those things and hopefully clear his name seeing as she obviously lied to her therapist six years ago just in case Kavanaugh would become a SC justice...?
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

rufus said:
I'm not so certain about that anymore. The race is tightening significantly. Flaggy needs to up his game if he's gonna stave off Drew, which I see he's already trying with his "left murdered a SC judge" conspiracy theory.
Click to expand...

Flaggy has definitely been coasting. His posts are 90% youtube links these days no commentary. That isnt the way to get elected Village Idiot. The people want to hear the idiocy, they want to feel it and right now Flaggy is just a (ro)bot.

Drew on the other hand is out in front with his lack of iq and inability to use reason and logic to come up with ideas. He might not be posting every day, but when he does he really beats us over the head with just how big of a moron he truly is. What he lacks in quantity he definitely has in quality!
 
FadeToBlack&Gold said:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Yup. <a href="https://twitter.com/Patbagley?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Patbagley</a> already did the cartoon: <a href="https://t.co/UWEeqayiyO">pic.twitter.com/UWEeqayiyO</a></p>— Cary Whitman�� (@Cary_wh) <a href="https://twitter.com/Cary_wh/status/1044779118519189504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 26, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Click to expand...
Ya it’s funny how republicans believed every woman who said Franken grabbed her without a doubt, but all these women accusing poor Brett are lying or unreliable
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Drew S. said:
This isn’t an episode of law & order no matter how much you wish it was. They can do all of those things and at best they will offer a subjective opinion. Given how political this has become you can bet your bottom dollar they will sit on the fence as much as possible.
Click to expand...

No, the FBI doesn't offer an opinion about the substance of background checks. They will offer the information.

What the Judiciary Committee and Senate does with that information is up to them. But at least we will have the information to be able to make a judgement.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Drew S. said:
This isn’t an episode of law & order no matter how much you wish it was. They can do all of those things and at best they will offer a subjective opinion. Given how political this has become you can bet your bottom dollar they will sit on the fence as much as possible.
Click to expand...

So let me get this straight...your contention is that the FBI cant ask questions and reach conclusions. Do you know what the FBI does exactly?

Follow up question...do you know what Congressional Hearings are?

Second Follow up: can you tell us the difference between a criminal investigation (which no one is asking for) and further Congressional hearings and the FBI investigating whether claims are credible

Final question...what is the point of investigating anything if we will never actually know what happened and we can only go by evidence and witnesses?

Keep trying though...my five year old daughter has a better grasp about how this works and I dont have a daughter. The only one pretending this is some TV show is you. In the real world we had a President impeached by these same old white men because he got a BJ and lied about it. Now we have a guy accused of multiple sexual assaults 2 steps away from being on the Supreme Court for life.
 
Last edited:
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

rufus said:
No, the FBI doesn't offer an opinion about the substance of background checks. They will offer the information.

What the Judiciary Committee and Senate does with that information is up to them. But at least we will have the information to be able to make a judgement.
Click to expand...

Ya know normally I would say "The FBI is pretty Republican if anything the GOP should be begging to have them look into this" but the truth is they wouldnt spit in the direction of anything Trump supports now. He has spent two years blaming them for everything and attacking their credibility and leadership. They wouldnt lean his way at this point if he bribed them.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Avenatti is a showboater, but he's not stupid.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Avenatti has released a sworn declaration from a third Kavanaugh accuser, Julie Swetnick. She says she was a victim of a gang rape after being drugged at a party in 1982, and alleges that Kavanaugh and Mark Judge were "present." <a href="https://t.co/7OQrs7IRyB">https://t.co/7OQrs7IRyB</a></p>— Natasha Bertrand (@NatashaBertrand) <a href="https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1044961793121095682?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 26, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Handyman said:
Flaggy has definitely been coasting. His posts are 90% youtube links these days no commentary. That isnt the way to get elected Village Idiot. The people want to hear the idiocy, they want to feel it and right now Flaggy is just a (ro)bot.

Drew on the other hand is out in front with his lack of iq and inability to use reason and logic to come up with ideas. He might not be posting every day, but when he does he really beats us over the head with just how big of a moron he truly is. What he lacks in quantity he definitely has in quality!
Click to expand...

I’ll stay off the political threads if my posting bothers you and others. I like to discuss the issues and to be honest it’s hard for me to understand how people can get so angry and nasty about them. I can’t imagine insulting someone who I don’t know anything about, but I guess that is the way of the world in 2018.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Today I learned the FBI can only offer a subjective opinion. To get a true investigation you have to go to cable news and congressional grandstanding.
 
Last edited:
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
I’m sure this ***** is lying too, just ask drew.

“BREAKING: Julie Swetnick filed a sworn declaration saying President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh grabbed women without their consent, tried to drug women at parties and was present when she was gang-raped.”
http://hill.cm/Iu1Ghkw
Click to expand...

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Michael Avenatti's client says Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh was present while she was "gang raped" during high school <a href="https://t.co/0qkI0AOMiN">https://t.co/0qkI0AOMiN</a> <a href="https://t.co/zrK6LvJy3p">pic.twitter.com/zrK6LvJy3p</a></p>— CBS News (@CBSNews) <a href="https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/1044975614669844480?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 26, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Included the picture cause she isnt a cute blonde so they wont believe her.

The stories she tells sound awful. Drew doesnt believe them but most normal thinking Non-Rapists might.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Families are separated, kids in cages, a sexual predator in the White House with one about to named SC for life and you don’t get why people get so angry? It’s telling that you’re not angry .
Try posting something with logic and thought and maybe it goes better
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

My personal reaction is Avenatti just dropped a bomb and the Republicans will ignore it at their own peril.

Here's hoping they hold the Friday Vote, and the Tuesday vote and Kavanaugh is pushed through. That will inflict maximum damage on the corrupt Republican Party and all of its members.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

Drew S. said:
I’ll stay off the political threads if my posting bothers you and others. I like to discuss the issues and to be honest it’s hard for me to understand how people can get so angry and nasty about them. I can’t imagine insulting someone who I don’t know anything about, but I guess that is the way of the world in 2018.
Click to expand...

You dont discuss the issues. You say what you believe and the second anyone disagrees with you or uses facts to prove you wrong you cry about it and then talk about how you are persecuted. Then you disappear for a few weeks come back and spout the same nonsense and try again. That isnt political discourse that is either epicly bad trolling or incompetence. All of us have, at times tried to have real discussion with you and you dont even try.

I dont like insulting people, but when you post moronic illogical things over and over again you either are trolling or you are an illogical moron. Since this subject is a rather sensitive, and since I know people who have A) been assaulted in much the same manner Kavanaugh is accused of and B) know why they never reported I am not going to sit idly by while you and your ilk ignore them and try and discredit them because of how long ago it was or if hey drank. I believe them. Your equating it to Hillary's emails is not only insulting, but disgusting.

You dont want to get called out, use some critical thinking skills.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

If Kavanaugh was thought of as upholding Roe, none of this would be happening.
 
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?

It's a sworn statement. You don't do that if it's not true, because you'll be in deep sh*t otherwise.

Kav is toast. Go figure, Republicans have all the power, and plenty of qualified candidates who would rule the same way Kav would. So what do they do? They nominate the worst candidate they could, just because Mushroom Dick liked his opinions on executive privilege. Congrats.

joecct said:
If Kavanaugh was thought of as upholding Roe, none of this would be happening.
Click to expand...

WRONG!
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top