What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

For me the whole article reeks of ethics issues...could be just me though.
 
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

If that is the case there is no one in law that is in politics that doesnt have an ethics issue. It doesnt look good but nothing does when put under a microscope.
 
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

The Sicatoka said:
If it's ACB some folks will melt down. Why?

Anyone have the Vegas book on the possibles? I still would like to put $5 on Sen. Mike Lee if he's 100:1 or more.
Click to expand...

https://www.actionnetwork.com/politics/next-supreme-court-justice-brett-kavanaugh-favorite-scotus

Brett Kavanaugh -130
Raymond Kethledge 130
Amy Coney Barrett 300
Amul Thapar 2000
Thomas Hardiman 2500
William Pryor, Mike Lee, Joan Larsen, Britt Grant, Don Willett, Paul Clement, Diane Sykes 10000
 
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

mookie1995 said:
Isn’t tD’s sister in play?
Click to expand...

She didn't even make the list of 25 this time. :eek:

Going to be itchy around the Thanksgiving dinner table. ;)



PS - mook, I worry when you use the phrase "in play" in regard to any female. ;)
 
Last edited:
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

Top 4 I heard this morning are.

Brett Kavanaugh
Raymond Kethledge
Amy Coney Barrett
Thomas Hardiman

Hardiman had been moving up all weekend.
 
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

Another Constitutionalist...one with a vendetta against the Clinton's. This should end well.
 
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

Do you suppose this entered into Trump's thought process? From wikipedia:

In 2009, Kavanaugh wrote an article for the Minnesota Law Review where he argued that U.S. Presidents should be exempt from “time-consuming and distracting” lawsuits and investigations, which “would ill serve the public interest, especially in times of financial or national security crisis.
 
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

burd said:
Do you suppose this entered into Trump's thought process? From wikipedia:

In 2009, Kavanaugh wrote an article for the Minnesota Law Review where he argued that U.S. Presidents should be exempt from “time-consuming and distracting” lawsuits and investigations, which “would ill serve the public interest, especially in times of financial or national security crisis.
Click to expand...

Maybe...but I bet it has more to do with him being part of the Starr investigation. This guy is Flaggy with a law degree.
 
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

Handyman said:
Maybe...but I bet it has more to do with him being part of the Starr investigation. This guy is Flaggy with a law degree.
Click to expand...

That's certainly important, but Trump's biggest risk factor now is Mueller. And Trump thinks in the present only.
 
Re: SCOTUS 10: Pack the Court!

I am sure joe is doing a happy dance. This guy stinks of "live babies for dead soldiers".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top