Re: RPI Off-Season Thread 2011 Part II: The Bryce is Right
Riiiight! And if they didn't win the cup it would be Go Penguins! Whatever!
Riiiight! And if they didn't win the cup it would be Go Penguins! Whatever!
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
RPI Off-Season Thread 2011 Part II: The Bryce is Right
- Thread starter Ralph Baer
- Start date
- Status
Re: RPI Off-Season Thread 2011 Part II: The Bryce is Right
I'm not a moderator, genius. How exactly would I have "banned you?" I recall putting you on ignore once, if that was what you're talking about, but that goes back to you not having the right to be taken seriously rather than your right to say what you want. Maybe that is what you desire? Do you want me to give up my quest to make you a redeemable poster and put you on ignore again? If I didn't care, I would have done that from the very beginning. Or perhaps, your feelings were hurt by that action... in which case you don't seem to have learned anything from it.
Anyway, I'm still waiting for you to explain that quote in a manner that makes the slightest shred of logical sense.
You lie to us?
By the way, Ralph? You may want to watch where you're swinging that word "babble." kthx.
I'm not a moderator, genius. How exactly would I have "banned you?" I recall putting you on ignore once, if that was what you're talking about, but that goes back to you not having the right to be taken seriously rather than your right to say what you want. Maybe that is what you desire? Do you want me to give up my quest to make you a redeemable poster and put you on ignore again? If I didn't care, I would have done that from the very beginning. Or perhaps, your feelings were hurt by that action... in which case you don't seem to have learned anything from it.
Anyway, I'm still waiting for you to explain that quote in a manner that makes the slightest shred of logical sense.
Wow do I love coming to a college hockey forum and having to talk like a politician...
You lie to us?
By the way, Ralph? You may want to watch where you're swinging that word "babble." kthx.
Re: RPI Off-Season Thread 2011 Part II: The Bryce is Right
Hahahahahaha! One half of the drooling idiots has enlightened us again! Its Section 14 moron! Who are you stalking these days, Hagwell, Schott, or Stewart? Whether I know alot about hockey or not doesn't matter. Just reading your moronic posts and knowing more than you is enough. Now call Red Cloud and get some help from someone who at least has knowledge of what he posts about!
Hahahahahaha! One half of the drooling idiots has enlightened us again! Its Section 14 moron! Who are you stalking these days, Hagwell, Schott, or Stewart? Whether I know alot about hockey or not doesn't matter. Just reading your moronic posts and knowing more than you is enough. Now call Red Cloud and get some help from someone who at least has knowledge of what he posts about!
Re: RPI Off-Season Thread 2011 Part II: The Bryce is Right
new/enhanced rules concerning ncaa hockey, just call it, "the Cornell Rule"
Embellishment/diving
In addition to the contact to the head and general emphasis on player safety, the committee received feedback from the coaching community that embellishment/diving seems to be a growing issue. The committee voted to make this a point of emphasis for the upcoming season and plans to include several video examples during preseason clinics.
“Diving and embellishment erode the integrity of our game and must be eliminated,” McLaughlin said. “Trying to deceive officials is unethical and unsporting. This has to be a collaborative effort to make progress.”
The committee decided to provide guidance regarding obstruction along the boards, where the defensive tactic of pressing and releasing an opponent should be allowed, but impeding is not. Again, additional video examples will be used to encourage consistent application of these rules.
Finally, the group points attention again to rules that deal with facewashing, which typically occurs after a stoppage in play. Continued and stringent enforcement of these rules is needed to improve the image of the game.
In other committee action, it was noted that exhibition games currently limit the number of student-athletes that may dress. After some clarification of the committee’s responsibility here, it has been proposed to remove the restriction on the number of players that may dress for exhibition games, pending approval from the Playing Rules Oversight Panel on a July conference call.
new/enhanced rules concerning ncaa hockey, just call it, "the Cornell Rule"
Embellishment/divingIn addition to the contact to the head and general emphasis on player safety, the committee received feedback from the coaching community that embellishment/diving seems to be a growing issue. The committee voted to make this a point of emphasis for the upcoming season and plans to include several video examples during preseason clinics.
“Diving and embellishment erode the integrity of our game and must be eliminated,” McLaughlin said. “Trying to deceive officials is unethical and unsporting. This has to be a collaborative effort to make progress.”
The committee decided to provide guidance regarding obstruction along the boards, where the defensive tactic of pressing and releasing an opponent should be allowed, but impeding is not. Again, additional video examples will be used to encourage consistent application of these rules.
Finally, the group points attention again to rules that deal with facewashing, which typically occurs after a stoppage in play. Continued and stringent enforcement of these rules is needed to improve the image of the game.
In other committee action, it was noted that exhibition games currently limit the number of student-athletes that may dress. After some clarification of the committee’s responsibility here, it has been proposed to remove the restriction on the number of players that may dress for exhibition games, pending approval from the Playing Rules Oversight Panel on a July conference call.
FlagDUDE08
Banned
Re: RPI Off-Season Thread 2011 Part II: The Bryce is Right
When did this argument between Red Cloud and myself become tag team wrestling....
When did this argument between Red Cloud and myself become tag team wrestling....
Ralph Baer
Let's Go 'Tute!
Re: RPI Off-Season Thread 2011 Part II: The Bryce is Right
Babble wasn't the best word to pick, but it was the first word that came to mind.
FlagDUDE08
Banned
Re: RPI Off-Season Thread 2011 Part II: The Bryce is Right
What is the current limit on players that may dress for exhibition games? I don't think it's the same 20-21, because I saw more players on the bench during last year's game against USA U-20.
new/enhanced rules concerning ncaa hockey, just call it, "the Cornell Rule"
In addition to the contact to the head and general emphasis on player safety, the committee received feedback from the coaching community that embellishment/diving seems to be a growing issue. The committee voted to make this a point of emphasis for the upcoming season and plans to include several video examples during preseason clinics.
“Diving and embellishment erode the integrity of our game and must be eliminated,” McLaughlin said. “Trying to deceive officials is unethical and unsporting. This has to be a collaborative effort to make progress.”
The committee decided to provide guidance regarding obstruction along the boards, where the defensive tactic of pressing and releasing an opponent should be allowed, but impeding is not. Again, additional video examples will be used to encourage consistent application of these rules.
Finally, the group points attention again to rules that deal with facewashing, which typically occurs after a stoppage in play. Continued and stringent enforcement of these rules is needed to improve the image of the game.
In other committee action, it was noted that exhibition games currently limit the number of student-athletes that may dress. After some clarification of the committee’s responsibility here, it has been proposed to remove the restriction on the number of players that may dress for exhibition games, pending approval from the Playing Rules Oversight Panel on a July conference call.
What is the current limit on players that may dress for exhibition games? I don't think it's the same 20-21, because I saw more players on the bench during last year's game against USA U-20.
FlagDUDE08
Banned
Re: RPI Off-Season Thread 2011 Part II: The Bryce is Right
Now I'm confused regarding turk's report: "In other committee action, it was noted that exhibition games currently limit the number of student-athletes that may dress. After some clarification of the committee’s responsibility here, it has been proposed to remove the restriction on the number of players that may dress for exhibition games, pending approval from the Playing Rules Oversight Panel on a July conference call."
Now I'm confused regarding turk's report: "In other committee action, it was noted that exhibition games currently limit the number of student-athletes that may dress. After some clarification of the committee’s responsibility here, it has been proposed to remove the restriction on the number of players that may dress for exhibition games, pending approval from the Playing Rules Oversight Panel on a July conference call."
Re: RPI Off-Season Thread 2011 Part II: The Bryce is Right
Wow!!! You got me johnk. I didn't know where you sit. You're right I am not an apologist for the league and question authority. I know what the next post is going to be from you johnk.. your famous gay slur. Tell Ken he still owes me a beer at your bar.
Wow!!! You got me johnk. I didn't know where you sit. You're right I am not an apologist for the league and question authority. I know what the next post is going to be from you johnk.. your famous gay slur. Tell Ken he still owes me a beer at your bar.
Re: RPI Off-Season Thread 2011 Part II: The Bryce is Right
Since ******pyDad had to get his 2 cents in with his post about me. He is still mad because I called him out about being 100% wrong on why Ken Schott wasn't covering a certain game. He felt it was OK to post pesonal attacks on Ken but didn't like it when it was turned on him. He has a hard time understanding that Ken knows much more than he does about RPI, Union, the ECAC and all of college hockey. See Aspy and his brother would make a better commissioner than Hagwell, better head of refs that Stewart and a better sportswriter than Schott but I'm the know it all.
When did this argument between Red Cloud and myself become tag team wrestling....
Since ******pyDad had to get his 2 cents in with his post about me. He is still mad because I called him out about being 100% wrong on why Ken Schott wasn't covering a certain game. He felt it was OK to post pesonal attacks on Ken but didn't like it when it was turned on him. He has a hard time understanding that Ken knows much more than he does about RPI, Union, the ECAC and all of college hockey. See Aspy and his brother would make a better commissioner than Hagwell, better head of refs that Stewart and a better sportswriter than Schott but I'm the know it all.
Re: RPI Off-Season Thread 2011 Part II: The Bryce is Right
If that's the rule, it was never enforced.
If that's the rule, it was never enforced.
Re: RPI Off-Season Thread 2011 Part II: The Bryce is Right
You tell him yourself but have him buy it for you at the Knotty Pine please.
You tell him yourself but have him buy it for you at the Knotty Pine please.
FlagDUDE08
Banned
Re: RPI Off-Season Thread 2011 Part II: The Bryce is Right
Well, it wouldn't be the first time. Add in the advertising-on-the-boards rule to that one, which I believe they just recently changed this past year to allow ads behind the goals.
Well, it wouldn't be the first time. Add in the advertising-on-the-boards rule to that one, which I believe they just recently changed this past year to allow ads behind the goals.
Re: RPI Off-Season Thread 2011 Part II: The Bryce is Right
We would. Apologizing for the league again, I see. Settle down big man..having some fun.
Re: RPI Off-Season Thread 2011 Part II: The Bryce is Right
Ahhhh you can question authority but I can't question the coach! Please find me a post where I wanted Appert fired.
Ahhhh you can question authority but I can't question the coach! Please find me a post where I wanted Appert fired.
Re: RPI Off-Season Thread 2011 Part II: The Bryce is Right
That was my brother who called into questions Ken's game coverage. I was the one who chided Kenny about his line of questioning on the Appert suspension which was out of line and also for not coming to Jason Klump's defense. Kenny is fine, his Phils are in first.
That was my brother who called into questions Ken's game coverage. I was the one who chided Kenny about his line of questioning on the Appert suspension which was out of line and also for not coming to Jason Klump's defense. Kenny is fine, his Phils are in first.
Re: RPI Off-Season Thread 2011 Part II: The Bryce is Right
See post Colgate series. This is like an IM session.
See post Colgate series. This is like an IM session.
Re: RPI Off-Season Thread 2011 Part II: The Bryce is Right
Not at all. I am at the head of the list of GO, if there is an iota of a chance to bolt to Hockey East. No love for the ECAC at all. Have a good day!
Not at all. I am at the head of the list of GO, if there is an iota of a chance to bolt to Hockey East. No love for the ECAC at all. Have a good day!
Last edited:
- Status