What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

RPI @ MSU-Mankato (10/19 - 10/20)

Re: RPI @ MSU-Mankato (10/19 - 10/20)

The dark suit is 1-0-1 in '12/'13. ;)
Padre: Didn't Seth have on a grey/dark suit on Fri. night? Some may choose to mock the tan suit curse...but I have seen too many beige debacles (pre-dating SA) at HFH to think otherwise...:D
 
Re: RPI @ MSU-Mankato (10/19 - 10/20)

Padre: Didn't Seth have on a grey/dark suit on Fri. night? Some may choose to mock the tan suit curse...but I have seen too many beige debacles (pre-dating SA) at HFH to think otherwise...:D

He did wear a tan suit the last time we played UNH and won, but by no means does that mean the curse was lifted.
 
Re: RPI @ MSU-Mankato (10/19 - 10/20)

Any MSU fans (too lazy to do the research myself honestly) know if they stream their games live for fans to watch? Preferably without a paywall? :) If not I'll just have to settle for listening to the game :P
 
Re: RPI @ MSU-Mankato (10/19 - 10/20)

Any MSU fans (too lazy to do the research myself honestly) know if they stream their games live for fans to watch? Preferably without a paywall? :) If not I'll just have to settle for listening to the game :P

I have told-and will repeat it here-that both games will be video streamed live on the web. I was not told if there was any cost to view.
 
Re: RPI @ MSU-Mankato (10/19 - 10/20)

That's how much they wanted for the UAH games last week. That's just crazy. I can't help but think that if they'd make it $2-3 a game, they'd get so many more viewers that they'd actually end up with more revenue.

It's not like any of the money goes to the schools, anyway. Not worth it; I'll either stick to WRPI, or better yet, the NYQP is this weekend.
 
Re: RPI @ MSU-Mankato (10/19 - 10/20)

It's not like any of the money goes to the schools, anyway. Not worth it; I'll either stick to WRPI, or better yet, the NYQP is this weekend.
Oh, I think some of it has to be going to the schools, or else they wouldn't give the rights to webcast it.
 
Re: RPI @ MSU-Mankato (10/19 - 10/20)

Oh, I think some of it has to be going to the schools, or else they wouldn't give the rights to webcast it.

Why do you think RPI dumped AmericaOne? Aside from the fact that their stream quality is about as good as the CFCF signal from where I grew up...
 
Re: RPI @ MSU-Mankato (10/19 - 10/20)

Oh, I think some of it has to be going to the schools, or else they wouldn't give the rights to webcast it.

RPI didn't get any money from America One and before that B2. That is what we were told over the last several years by representatives of RPI-TV. RPI did it purely to get athletics (including friends-and-family sports) on the net. The fact that RPI is not attempting to get money this year from RPI-TV productions leads more credence to that. I suppose that it could be different for MSU-M.
 
Re: RPI @ MSU-Mankato (10/19 - 10/20)

RPI didn't get any money from America One and before that B2. That is what we were told over the last several years by representatives of RPI-TV. RPI did it purely to get athletics (including friends-and-family sports) on the net. The fact that RPI is not attempting to get money this year from RPI-TV productions leads more credence to that. I suppose that it could be different for MSU-M.

Typically, schools that sign with America One get a cut of the profit once a threshold has been met. RPI TV did not receive any money from America One, however RPI most likely did.
 
Re: RPI @ MSU-Mankato (10/19 - 10/20)

Typically, schools that sign with America One get a cut of the profit once a threshold has been met. RPI TV did not receive any money from America One, however RPI most likely did.
Well, that would make sense; if it costs the company as much or more to produce the programming as they make from subscribers, the school would probably be willing to take zero for the exposure. I have no knowledge if MSU gets any money from the cable channel that carries their home games or from internet streaming.
 
Re: RPI @ MSU-Mankato (10/19 - 10/20)

From word of mouth, I heard the stream is very good. A friend of mine watched the Mavs and the Bulldogs last weekend and said he could even go picture in picture and watch.
 
Re: RPI @ MSU-Mankato (10/19 - 10/20)

Why do you think RPI dumped AmericaOne? Aside from the fact that their stream quality is about as good as the CFCF signal from where I grew up...

Will you please explain your analogy? No one gets it.
 
Re: RPI @ MSU-Mankato (10/19 - 10/20)

That's how much they wanted for the UAH games last week. That's just crazy. I can't help but think that if they'd make it $2-3 a game, they'd get so many more viewers that they'd actually end up with more revenue.

I'm surprised they don't experiment a bit more to find out....

There's a very interesting progression on how pricing these kinds of packages works (see: history of cell phone pricing):
> step one: charge what you need to cover your fixed costs given your initial subscriber base
> step two: once your fixed costs are covered (you have a required minimum number of subscribers), you can increase overall revenue by then reducing what you charge more slowly than your subscriber base increases, since incremental costs are a small part of your total charge
> step three: you now have so many subscribers that your fixed costs now are a small fraction of total revenue, and it's all about finding the "sweet spot" between size of subscriber base and what you charge them.
 
Re: RPI @ MSU-Mankato (10/19 - 10/20)

I'm surprised they don't experiment a bit more to find out....

There's a very interesting progression on how pricing these kinds of packages works (see: history of cell phone pricing):
> step one: charge what you need to cover your fixed costs given your initial subscriber base
> step two: once your fixed costs are covered (you have a required minimum number of subscribers), you can increase overall revenue by then reducing what you charge more slowly than your subscriber base increases, since incremental costs are a small part of your total charge
> step three: you now have so many subscribers that your fixed costs now are a small fraction of total revenue, and it's all about finding the "sweet spot" between size of subscriber base and what you charge them.

I think that it works that way more in theory than in practice. When B2 started I was overjoyed just to have it available. After a while i watched more critically. Also i suspect that there are more subscribers when are winning.
 
Back
Top