Re: RPI Hockey 2012-2013 Part IV: Not A Finished Product Yet
You didn't specify.
You missed the first half.
You didn't specify.
You missed the first half.
I was looking at the boxscore and noticed that Iles got an assist on the Cornell's SHG. Didn't we give the puck to them?
Also I note that Bailen got a -4 for the game. He was on the ice for all of Cornell's goals and not for Fulton's. I wonder what the record is for being "perfect" in that regard.
Agree completely, but we have to win. If we win this evening, the loss vs. Cornell won't hurt and could actually benefit the team psychologically.
We are now #23 in the PWR.
I was looking at the boxscore and noticed that Iles got an assist on the Cornell's SHG. Didn't we give the puck to them?
Also I note that Bailen got a -4 for the game. He was on the ice for all of Cornell's goals and not for Fulton's. I wonder what the record is for being "perfect" in that regard.
On the scoreboard it read 4-1. Very misleading-we had plenty of chances and gave up 2 that we normally would not have. Cornell deserved the win-they took advantage of 2 mistakes on our part. Very important to bounce back tonight-and not let this become a new trend. I disagree on one thing though-I don't often find any way that losing is helpful psychologically when it ends a long unbeaten streak. The boys will just have to shake this one off-just be glad this stuff happened last night in the regular season and not in a playoff game.
The Curseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee !!!![]()
We have one for RPI also !! Be careful or I "egg" you tonight !
I am not a psychologist or anything close, but I have read many times that the tie vs. LSSU in 1985 that ended our winning streak got a weight off the team's shoulders.On the scoreboard it read 4-1. Very misleading-we had plenty of chances and gave up 2 that we normally would not have. Cornell deserved the win-they took advantage of 2 mistakes on our part. Very important to bounce back tonight-and not let this become a new trend. I disagree on one thing though-I don't often find any way that losing is helpful psychologically when it ends a long unbeaten streak. The boys will just have to shake this one off-just be glad this stuff happened last night in the regular season and not in a playoff game.
I am not a psychologist or anything close, but I have read many times that the tie vs. LSSU in 1985 that ended our winning streak got a weight off the team's shoulders.
I am missing something or I wasn't clear. I do realize that it was a two-game total-goal series. After that tie, the winning streak was no more (although the non-losing streak remained), so the streak was off their shoulders, athough of course they had to beat UMD anyway.We were at that tie-that series if you recall was just total goals. We had won big the night before. Once the second night was a close game-Coach MA just shut us down. We played more defensive than I had seen all year-and i had seen most every game. We had our most potent scorers dropping back to our own blue line and settled for whatever result as long as we did not give up enough goals to overcome the previous night. Whoever wrote that stuff about that tie took a weight off the team's shoulders either was not at the game, did not know what they were saying, or concocted a nice little story. Trust me-If we had to win 2 out of 3 in that series instead of total goals-we would have scored more than 3 in that game. That team was on an incredible roll-and could care less about the win that night. They were focused on the big prize that eluded them the year before.
We were at that tie-that series if you recall was just total goals. We had won big the night before. Once the second night was a close game-Coach MA just shut us down. We played more defensive than I had seen all year-and i had seen most every game. We had our most potent scorers dropping back to our own blue line and settled for whatever result as long as we did not give up enough goals to overcome the previous night. Whoever wrote that stuff about that tie took a weight off the team's shoulders either was not at the game, did not know what they were saying, or concocted a nice little story. Trust me-If we had to win 2 out of 3 in that series instead of total goals-we would have scored more than 3 in that game. That team was on an incredible roll-and could care less about the win that night. They were focused on the big prize that eluded them the year before.
100% correct, Doc. I was at that game myself and it was a 2-game total goals series (just like it was the year before against North Dakota). We won 7-3 on Friday night and once we scored a couple of goals, we were just sitting back preventing LSSU from an all out scoring attack, something that we hadn't done all season. They had enough pride that they didn't want to lose their final home game in front of their fans, but winning that second game wasn't really necessary. We had shirts that said "Destination Detroit", and that's what the goal was all along after the major disappointment the year before.