What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

RPI Engineers 2018-2019

Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Senior goaltender Kira Bombay was honored with <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ECAC?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ECAC</a> Goalie of the Week honors after pitching her first career shutout and earning a pair of conference wins on the weekend ... Read more: <a href="https://t.co/qX7XIoHH5E">https://t.co/qX7XIoHH5E</a> <a href="https://t.co/wYlhWpZdMD">pic.twitter.com/wYlhWpZdMD</a></p>— RPI Women's Hockey (@RPI_WHockey) <a href="https://twitter.com/RPI_WHockey/status/1062036132630851584?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 12, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

Julia Blitz singing National Letter of Intent

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Practice, then lift, then sign! Congratulations to Julia Blitz (<a href="https://twitter.com/RPI_WHockey?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RPI_WHockey</a>), Hannah Humphreys (<a href="https://twitter.com/Dartmouth_WIH?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Dartmouth_WIH</a>), Katelyn Brightbill (<a href="https://twitter.com/FPUathletics?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@FPUathletics</a>), and Lily Wildman (<a href="https://twitter.com/SLUsaints?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SLUsaints</a>) on signing to play NCAA D1 Hockey next season! <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NationalSigningDay?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NationalSigningDay</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/primetimegrindtime?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#primetimegrindtime</a> <a href="https://t.co/AssmWd3gCb">pic.twitter.com/AssmWd3gCb</a></p>— Washington Pride (@PrideHockeyDC) <a href="https://twitter.com/PrideHockeyDC/status/1062898105929158657?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 15, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

Hannah Price

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Congratulations Chayla, Hannah & Gwyneth on signing your NLI’s today! <a href="https://t.co/Usmn7AQgus">pic.twitter.com/Usmn7AQgus</a></p>— Penguins Elite (@PghPensElite) <a href="https://twitter.com/PghPensElite/status/1062899795759693824?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 15, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Excited to make things official with <a href="https://twitter.com/RPI_WHockey?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RPI_WHockey</a> !! <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/goengineers?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#goengineers</a> <a href="https://t.co/r63ef2dT3R">pic.twitter.com/r63ef2dT3R</a></p>— Teeghan Dalby (@tee_dalbs) <a href="https://twitter.com/tee_dalbs/status/1063567967567441930?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 16, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">It’s official! Congratulations to Maddy Peterson as she signs her National Letter of Intent to play Women’s Hockey next year at RPI! <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/PrincetonProud?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#PrincetonProud</a> <a href="https://t.co/nRkt2rbueJ">pic.twitter.com/nRkt2rbueJ</a></p>— PHSTigersMN (@PHSTigersMN) <a href="https://twitter.com/PHSTigersMN/status/1064626759507877888?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 19, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Happy birthday to our fearless leader, <a href="https://twitter.com/VinesBryan?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@VinesBryan</a>! The boss turned the big 4-0 today and was greeted with some balloons. &#55358;&#56691;&#55356;&#57224; <a href="https://t.co/LRmApgmaX1">pic.twitter.com/LRmApgmaX1</a></p>— RPI Women's Hockey (@RPI_WHockey) <a href="https://twitter.com/RPI_WHockey/status/1065020781191720961?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 20, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

We didn't play any league games, but our KRACH did change so we slipped a bit. I only ran 100k sims this week, but the averages should still be basically the same as if I had (the ranges may be narrower, but you can't assume that as a rule). There's basically a tie between us, Quinnipiac, and Brown just above the cut line, so we have a little bit of wiggle room here, but it's going to be pretty important to take a few points at Harvard and Dartmouth in a couple weeks, even though it's on the road.

RPI KRACH (RRWP): 57.54 (0.3850)

MCTs (Mean/Median/Mode/Range):
Points - 19.82 / 20 / 20 / 6 - 35
Rank - 7.24 / 7 / 6 / 1 - 12
Playoffs - 77.6% (Home - 2.7%)
Most likely opponent - at Princeton (18.7%)

Conference Rankings:
  1. Clarkson
  2. Princeton
  3. SLU
  4. Cornell
    —————
  5. Colgate
  6. RPI
  7. Quinnipiac
  8. Brown
    —————
    —————
  9. Harvard
  10. Yale
  11. Dartmouth
  12. Union

RPI Points vs. Position:
Code: 
   |     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9    10    11    12
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 4 |                                                                        
 5 |                                                                        
 6 |                                                                     0.0
 7 |                                                                     0.0
 8 |                                                               0.0   0.0
 9 |                                                               0.0   [B]0.1[/B]
10 |                                                         0.0   0.1   [B]0.2[/B]
11 |                                                   0.0   0.1   [B]0.3[/B]   0.2
12 |                                                   0.0   0.3   [B]0.6[/B]   0.2
13 |                                             0.0   0.2   [B]0.8   0.8[/B]   0.1
14 |                                             0.1   0.7   [B]1.5[/B]   0.7   0.1
15 |                                       0.0   0.5   [B]2.1[/B]   1.8   0.4   0.0
16 |                                 0.0   0.2   1.7   [B]3.2[/B]   1.4   0.1      
17 |                                 0.1   1.0   [B]3.6[/B]   3.0   0.5   0.0      
18 |                           0.0   0.3   2.8   [B]4.6[/B]   1.8   0.2   0.0      
19 |                           0.0   1.3   [B]4.6[/B]   3.9   0.7   0.0            
20 |                           0.1   3.1   [B]5.3[/B]   2.2   0.2   0.0            
21 |                           0.3   [B]4.7[/B]   4.2   0.9   0.0                  
22 |                     0.0   0.8   [B]5.5[/B]   2.5   0.3   0.0                  
23 |               0.0   0.0   1.5   [B]4.7[/B]   1.1   0.1                        
24 |               0.0   0.1   2.0   [B]3.3[/B]   0.3   0.0                        
25 |               0.0   0.3   [B]2.0[/B]   1.6   0.1                              
26 |               0.0   0.4   [B]1.5[/B]   0.6   0.0                              
27 |         0.0   0.1   0.5   [B]0.8[/B]   0.2   0.0                              
28 |         0.0   0.1   [B]0.4[/B]   0.3   0.0                                    
29 |   0.0   0.0   0.1   [B]0.2[/B]   0.1   0.0                                    
30 |   0.0   0.0   [B]0.1   0.1[/B]   0.0                                          
31 |   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                          
32 |   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                                
33 |   0.0   0.0                                                            
34 |         0.0                                                            
35 |   0.0   0.0                                                            
36 |                                                                        
37 |                                                                        
38 |                                                                        
39 |                                                                        
40 |

But also we should score some goals (and also take more shots).
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Happy Thanksgiving from our family to yours! &#55358;&#56707;&#55356;&#57149;&#55356;&#57153; <a href="https://t.co/rwI5QlJ4i5">pic.twitter.com/rwI5QlJ4i5</a></p>— RPI Women's Hockey (@RPI_WHockey) <a href="https://twitter.com/RPI_WHockey/status/1065666067136159748?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 22, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

So, once again today this team demonstrates that they are a hard working and disciplined team. But severely lacking in offense. Over to you Marc Cavosie. What are you doing to turn that around?
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

Reddington said:
I am shocked Selander did not play today.
Click to expand...

I wasn't. Bombay has been playing well this season, Selander had a busy game on Saturday, and it was a non-league game, so why not give Bombay some time? It's too bad that both are graduating this year.
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

More games, more losses, more KRACH slippage, and even though these games didn't even count, our cushion is basically gone. At least we play meaningful hockey this weekend. Anything less than two points would put us in a worse position than we are now.

RPI KRACH (RRWP): 43.98 (0.3338)

MCTs (Mean/Median/Mode/Range):
Points - 18.43 / 18 / 18 / 6 - 34
Rank - 7.90 / 8 / 8 / 1 - 12
Playoffs - 65.3% (Home - 1.1%)
Most likely opponent - at Clarkson (17.4%)

Conference Rankings:
  1. Clarkson
  2. Princeton
  3. SLU
  4. Cornell
    —————
  5. Colgate
  6. Quinnipiac
  7. Brown
  8. RPI
    —————
    —————
  9. Harvard
  10. Yale
  11. Dartmouth
  12. Union

This Weekend's Playoff Implications:
Code: 
       |    Ha     |
_______| W | T | L |
|  | W |84%|74%|62%|
|Da| T |76%|63%|51%|
|  | L |66%|53%|39%|

RPI Points vs. Position:
Code: 
   |     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9    10    11    12
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 4 |                                                                        
 5 |                                                                        
 6 |                                                                     0.0
 7 |                                                               0.0   0.0
 8 |                                                               0.0   [B]0.1[/B]
 9 |                                                         0.0   0.1   [B]0.2[/B]
10 |                                                   0.0   0.0   0.3   [B]0.4[/B]
11 |                                                   0.0   0.2   [B]0.7[/B]   0.4
12 |                                                   0.1   0.7   [B]1.1[/B]   0.3
13 |                                             0.0   0.5   [B]1.7[/B]   1.3   0.2
14 |                                       0.0   0.2   1.7   [B]2.6[/B]   0.9   0.1
15 |                                       0.0   0.8   [B]3.4[/B]   2.6   0.4   0.0
16 |                                 0.0   0.2   2.6   [B]4.7[/B]   1.6   0.1   0.0
17 |                                 0.0   0.9   [B]4.7[/B]   4.0   0.6   0.0      
18 |                                 0.2   2.6   [B]5.7[/B]   2.5   0.2            
19 |                           0.0   0.8   4.3   [B]4.8[/B]   1.0   0.0            
20 |                           0.0   1.8   [B]5.1[/B]   2.9   0.3   0.0            
21 |                           0.2   2.8   [B]4.0[/B]   1.2   0.1                  
22 |                     0.0   0.4   [B]3.3[/B]   2.6   0.4   0.0                  
23 |                     0.0   0.7   [B]2.8[/B]   1.2   0.1                        
24 |                     0.1   0.9   [B]1.9[/B]   0.4   0.0                        
25 |               0.0   0.1   [B]1.0   1.0[/B]   0.1   0.0                        
26 |               0.0   0.2   [B]0.7[/B]   0.4   0.0                              
27 |               0.0   0.2   [B]0.3[/B]   0.1                                    
28 |         0.0   [B]0.1   0.1   0.1[/B]   0.0                                    
29 |         0.0   0.0   [B]0.1[/B]   0.0                                          
30 |   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                          
31 |   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                                
32 |   0.0   0.0   0.0                                                      
33 |   0.0   0.0   0.0                                                      
34 |   0.0   0.0                                                            
35 |                                                                        
36 |                                                                        
37 |                                                                        
38 |                                                                        
39 |                                                                        
40 |
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

Before this weekend, I said two points would be enough to keep us at break-even, but Harvard taking four points has propelled them above us on the table and left us in a much more precarious position. Looking forward, we've got a tough home weekend coming. Knocking off Princeton is unlikely, but beating Quinnipiac is just the kind of win we need to get at home if we think we're good enough to compete in this league. Regardless, anything less than two points would likely push us on the wrong side of the coin flip.

RPI KRACH (RRWP): 43.09 (0.3317)

MCTs (Mean/Median/Mode/Range):
Points - 17.85 / 18 / 18 / 6 - 34
Rank - 8.28 / 8 / 9 / 1 - 12
Playoffs - 53.1% (Home - 0.6%)
Most likely opponent - at Princeton (19.7%)

Conference Rankings:
  1. Princeton
  2. Cornell
  3. Colgate
  4. Clarkson
    —————
  5. SLU
  6. Harvard
  7. Quinnipiac
  8. Brown
    —————
    —————
  9. RPI
  10. Dartmouth
  11. Yale
  12. Union

This Weekend's Playoff Implications:
Code: 
       |    Pr     |
_______| W | T | L |
|  | W |82%|73%|65%|
|Qu| T |70%|60%|51%|
|  | L |60%|47%|39%|

RPI Points vs. Position:
Code: 
   |     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9    10    11    12
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 6 |                                                               0.0   0.0
 7 |                                                         0.0   0.0   0.0
 8 |                                                         0.0   0.0   0.0
 9 |                                                         0.0   [B]0.1   0.1[/B]
10 |                                                   0.0   0.1   [B]0.4[/B]   0.1
11 |                                                   0.0   0.4   [B]0.7[/B]   0.1
12 |                                             0.0   0.2   [B]1.1   1.1[/B]   0.1
13 |                                             0.0   0.7   [B]2.3[/B]   1.1   0.0
14 |                                       0.0   0.1   2.3   [B]3.3[/B]   0.8   0.0
15 |                                       0.0   0.6   [B]4.5[/B]   3.1   0.4   0.0
16 |                                 0.0   0.1   2.0   [B]6.4[/B]   2.2   0.1   0.0
17 |                                 0.0   0.4   4.1   [B]6.3[/B]   1.0   0.0      
18 |                                 0.1   1.5   [B]6.0[/B]   4.4   0.3   0.0      
19 |                           0.0   0.3   3.0   [B]5.8[/B]   2.1   0.1            
20 |                           0.0   0.9   [B]4.1[/B]   4.0   0.7   0.0            
21 |                     0.0   0.1   1.6   [B]3.8[/B]   1.8   0.2   0.0            
22 |                     0.0   0.2   2.1   [B]2.4[/B]   0.6   0.0                  
23 |               0.0   0.0   0.4   [B]1.8[/B]   1.1   0.1   0.0                  
24 |               0.0   0.1   0.6   [B]1.2[/B]   0.3   0.0                        
25 |               0.0   0.1   [B]0.5   0.5[/B]   0.1   0.0                        
26 |               0.0   0.1   [B]0.3[/B]   0.1   0.0                              
27 |         0.0   0.0   [B]0.1   0.1[/B]   0.0   0.0                              
28 |         0.0   0.0   [B]0.1[/B]   0.0   0.0                                    
29 |         0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                    
30 |         0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                          
31 |   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                                
32 |   0.0   0.0   0.0                                                      
33 |   0.0   0.0                                                            
34 |   0.0                                                                  
35 |                                                                        
36 |                                                                        
37 |                                                                        
38 |
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

Who would have thought that after six league games, RPI would be tied in the standings with Clarkson?
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

Reddington said:
No one can say they predicted that. Lovisa is tremendous.
Click to expand...

I agree. On the Clarkson board, a Clarkson fan, who will remain nameless, was disappointed that Selander was picked over Sauve on the preseason ECAC all-star team, despite the fact that Sauve had not yet played for Clarkson. Preseason teams are pretty meaningless, but Selander was the logical choice.
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

Based on Lovisa' s performance last year, she easily should have been a pre-season pick. That's not taking anything from Sauve but she is the newcomer.
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

Ralph Baer said:
I agree. On the Clarkson board, a Clarkson fan, who will remain nameless, was disappointed that Selander was picked over Sauve on the preseason ECAC all-star team, despite the fact that Sauve had not yet played for Clarkson. Preseason teams are pretty meaningless, but Selander was the logical choice.
Click to expand...

I was not disappointed Ralph, only pointing out Selander's pick. ;)
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

vicb said:
I was not disappointed Ralph, only pointing out Selander's pick. ;)
Click to expand...

I guess that it is the usual problem with posts rather than conversations -- it is hard to figure out the exact intent of a post. I have certainly been misinterpreted many times also. You wrote:

Clarkson places Gabel, Giguere and Shelton on the ECAC Pre-Season All League team. Congrats to them. Sauve is passed over for the goalie position.

https://www.ecachockey.com/women/2018-19/News/20180911_-_Pre-Season_All-League
Click to expand...

I interpreted "passed over" as meaning "she should have won, but didn't". As I wrote in response that I chuckled over this and did say that when the smoke clears, Sauve could be the end-of-year selection.


Moving on. Considering RPI's lack of offense this season and the amount that the team has to rely on Selander to have a shot at the playoffs, I wonder how they will do next year. With both Selander and Bombay graduating and Gregg yet to have seen any game action, the team will have to rely on rookies as in 2015-16. Amanda Rampado appears to be a good goaltender, but I wonder how good. We still need another, or at least I have not seen another mentioned anywhere.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top