What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

RPI Engineers 2018-2019

Ralph Baer said:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">What Makes the ECAC Patty Kazmaier Nominees Tick?<a href="https://t.co/xA4KA7pKQO">https://t.co/xA4KA7pKQO</a></p>— Title (MMX)IX Hockey (@TitleIXHockey) <a href="https://twitter.com/TitleIXHockey/status/1100101734184042496?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 25, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



There are some links in the article including highlights in the second page of https://www.instagram.com/rpiathletics/p/Brnep5nHzxt/.
Click to expand...

I will be the stick in the mud here. As good as she is, I don’t believe she belongs in the top 10 and she should not win this award. There are better goalies in the NCAA who don’t get the same level of recognition. With the exception of the Princeton game, her stats against upper echelon teams are less than stellar. There are other position players that should have been on the top 10 list that were excluded. I am happy for her but feel for others that have accomplished as much or more at their respective positions that were ignored.
 
Puckdrop14 said:
I will be the stick in the mud here. As good as she is, I don’t believe she belongs in the top 10 and she should not win this award. There are better goalies in the NCAA who don’t get the same level of recognition. With the exception of the Princeton game, her stats against upper echelon teams are less than stellar. There are other position players that should have been on the top 10 list that were excluded. I am happy for her but feel for others that have accomplished as much or more at their respective positions that were ignored.
Click to expand...

And people thought I was Debbie Downer!! Wow.
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

Puckdrop14 said:
There are better goalies in the NCAA who don’t get the same level of recognition. With the exception of the Princeton game, her stats against upper echelon teams are less than stellar.
Click to expand...
I remember the first game that Noora Räty played against Wisconsin. It wasn't a very good UW team, but the Gophers, other than Räty, weren't all that in 2009-10 either. The stats will show that she allowed 4 goals on 43 shots, a rather "meh" stat line, but she played great. Her teammates kept breaking down, and the Badgers were attacking from along the goal line and then passing to the slot. She saved most of those, but it's hard to save them all. After the game, she told Brad Frost, "It felt like it was me against all of them."

I would guess that over her four years, Selander has had that feeling a few times. It is hard to put stats of goalies next to each other and compare them, unless you also get to watch the goalies to see how those numbers are produced. There may be a couple goalies in the NCAA who had better seasons than Selander. Maybe Reed did, but she plays behind a better team. But IMO, Selander is right up there.
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

Well, LS didn't make the top 3.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Top-3 Finalists for the 2019 <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/PattyKaz?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#PattyKaz</a> Award have been announced → <a href="https://t.co/PBzOXydKCf">https://t.co/PBzOXydKCf</a> <a href="https://t.co/Zt2RULXGwN">pic.twitter.com/Zt2RULXGwN</a></p>— USA Hockey (@usahockey) <a href="https://twitter.com/usahockey/status/1101181228365930496?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 28, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Ralph Baer said:
Well, LS didn't make the top 3.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Top-3 Finalists for the 2019 <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/PattyKaz?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#PattyKaz</a> Award have been announced → <a href="https://t.co/PBzOXydKCf">https://t.co/PBzOXydKCf</a> <a href="https://t.co/Zt2RULXGwN">pic.twitter.com/Zt2RULXGwN</a></p>— USA Hockey (@usahockey) <a href="https://twitter.com/usahockey/status/1101181228365930496?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 28, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Click to expand...

That's disappointing for sure. Pankowski over Selander is questionable in just my opinion. Gabel and Keller will be tough to beat.
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

Cornell defeated RPI 2-1 in OT. :(
SOGs 65-7 in Cornell's favor.


edit: shots 128 to 14.
 
Last edited:
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

Still Eeyore said:
Care to reconsider?
Click to expand...
Yes, especially a game like last night where the puck is in her zone so much, so she has to constantly be moving, setting up, and focused on the puck. A great performance bye Selander, IMO.
 
ARM said:
Yes, especially a game like last night where the puck is in her zone so much, so she has to constantly be moving, setting up, and focused on the puck. A great performance bye Selander, IMO.
Click to expand...

No disrespect to Pankowski, but you take Pankowski off of Wisconsin, does that even alter their standings? But, Selander off of RPI, my goodness, who even knows. Robbed in my opinion of being a Kaz final three finalist. Yes, I am an Orosz fan and yes d do a big part too. But, with that shot total for and against is illuminating.
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

Similar story as yesterday (so far) for RPI: being outshot 19-4 but leading 1-0 in the second on a goal by ....Orosz.
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

Guys Lovisa is bad against top competition. I heard it from a reliable source.

But really, an amazing game by her and the defense doing a good job of clearing the slot on a number of occasions. Someone other than Orosz needs to step up tomorrow. She has 9 of our 17 shots and all of our goals.
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

lugnut92 said:
Guys Lovisa is bad against top competition. I heard it from a reliable source.

But really, an amazing game by her and the defense doing a good job of clearing the slot on a number of occasions. Someone other than Orosz needs to step up tomorrow. She has 9 of our 17 shots and all of our goals.
Click to expand...

Yeah really. After all, didn't she get pulled from a game? :rolleyes:
 
Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

Cornell's newspaper article.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">NCAA all-time saves leader Lovisa Selander has made 112 saves in two games versus the Red. <br>Will <a href="https://twitter.com/CornellWHockey?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@CornellWHockey</a> be able to slip the puck by Selander in game 3 to skate by RPI to the semis?<a href="https://t.co/GWzlG1nkBV">https://t.co/GWzlG1nkBV</a></p>— Cornell Daily Sun Sports (@DailySunSports) <a href="https://twitter.com/DailySunSports/status/1102042717742399488?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 3, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top