What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

RPI 2011-12 Part III: Our Goal is to be Offensive

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: RPI 2011-12 Part III: Our Goal is to be Offensive

rvd5star69 said:
Haggerty wasnt sick last weekend. Undisclosed injury in practice. Lets beat Union and start a winning streak. Also last 18 games played 3 wins I think is unacceptable.:(:(:(
Click to expand...

You can stretch that out even further if you like (5-19-1 in last 25), but what is the point. Everyone knows the record late last year and so far this season is awful. What needs to be done to turn it around is the question. Nobody on this thread has the answer. We can only hope that the coaching staff and players do.
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Part III: Our Goal is to be Offensive

rvd5star69 said:
Haggerty wasnt sick last weekend. Undisclosed injury in practice. Lets beat Union and start a winning streak. Also last 18 games played 3 wins I think is unacceptable.:(:(:(
Click to expand...

It seems that we sustain more practice injuries than game injuries. I wonder what is going on with that?
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Part III: Our Goal is to be Offensive

rvd5star69 said:
Haggerty wasnt sick last weekend. Undisclosed injury in practice. Lets beat Union and start a winning streak. Also last 18 games played 3 wins I think is unacceptable.:(:(:(
Click to expand...

Maybe the injury made him sick. ;)
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Part III: Our Goal is to be Offensive

A bit early but I just took a quick look at the current PWR and noticed that only one ECAC team would qualify for the NCAA tournament, that being Cornell. They are ranked 15th so even if a different team wins the league tournament they would end up bumping Cornell out. Do you think with the realignment thats happening in a year and a half that this could end up being a common occurance with the ECAC?
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Part III: Our Goal is to be Offensive

redhead18 said:
A bit early but I just took a quick look at the current PWR and noticed that only one ECAC team would qualify for the NCAA tournament, that being Cornell. They are ranked 15th so even if a different team wins the league tournament they would end up bumping Cornell out. Do you think with the realignment thats happening in a year and a half that this could end up being a common occurance with the ECAC?
Click to expand...

Why else did we fill up two threads about the speculation concerning a move to Hockey East?

What are the conglomerate NC records between leagues?
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Part III: Our Goal is to be Offensive

FlagDUDE08 said:
We already distinguish ourselves from 50 other colleges who play D-I hockey. 52, to be exact. Just take a look at where our other sports play.
Click to expand...

That's right, we're the only college team who plays all of their home games in Troy, NY! :rolleyes:
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Part III: Our Goal is to be Offensive

redhead18 said:
A bit early but I just took a quick look at the current PWR and noticed that only one ECAC team would qualify for the NCAA tournament, that being Cornell. They are ranked 15th so even if a different team wins the league tournament they would end up bumping Cornell out. Do you think with the realignment thats happening in a year and a half that this could end up being a common occurance with the ECAC?
Click to expand...
Things still can improve for the ECAC this year. I do expect that league to get at least two bids when the smoke clears.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top