What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

RPI 2010-2011 VI- Red Dead Redemption

Re: RPI 2010-2011 VI- Red Dead Redemption

Hey, at least they're not in GB ;)....watching CC absolutely take BC apart- wondering, together with AFA taking Yale to OT, if UND is watching do they start to realize that maybe a 4th seed is no joke.... or, looking at " the glass half-full"...does RPI get a lift out of what other 4th seeded teams have done so far?...They just had the Secretary of the NCAA rules on between 2&3rd period of CC/BC trying to explain the contraversial goal....didn't convince me...if you can't see the puck how can you overturn the on-ice call which was NO GOAL

I vote we copy CC...
 
Re: RPI 2010-2011 VI- Red Dead Redemption

Zebras from the UNO- Michigan controversial ending sound familiar? :rolleyes:;):o

Referees: Harry Dumas, Chip McDonald
Assistant Referees: Gleen Cooke, Justin Prusak

edit:not saying its the wrong call, but i dont see the conclusive evidence to overturn the on ice decision

ECAC refs are "excellent". Just ask Paul Stewart. Did I tell you Feola did the Olympics?
 
Re: RPI 2010-2011 VI- Red Dead Redemption

Hey, at least they're not in GB ;)....watching CC absolutely take BC apart- wondering, together with AFA taking Yale to OT, if UND is watching do they start to realize that maybe a 4th seed is no joke.... or, looking at " the glass half-full"...does RPI get a lift out of what other 4th seeded teams have done so far?...They just had the Secretary of the NCAA rules on between 2&3rd period of CC/BC trying to explain the contraversial goal....didn't convince me...if you can't see the puck how can you overturn the on-ice call which was NO GOAL

I videotaped the game-watched the so-called winning goal ten times. Unless they had a view that i did not get-there was absolutely no way to see that puck cross the goal line. This has to be one of the worst calls in NCAA tournament history. Every goal should be clear but in overtime? You need absolute visual evidence to overturn a decision made on the ice-if i was NO i think i would be a tad upset.
 
Last edited:
Re: RPI 2010-2011 VI- Red Dead Redemption

I videotaped the game-watched the so-called winning goal ten times. Unless they had a view that i did not get-there was absolutely no way to see that puck cross the goal line. This has to be one of the worst calls in NCAA tournament history. Every goal should be clear but in overtime? You need absolute visual evidence to overturn a decision made on the ice-if i was NO i think i would be a tad upset.

What a way to end your season... that was a truly awful decision.
 
Re: RPI 2010-2011 VI- Red Dead Redemption

I videotaped the game-watched the so-called winning goal ten times. Unless they had a view that i did not get-there was absolutely no way to see that puck cross the goal line. This has to be one of the worst calls in NCAA tournament history. Every goal should be clear but in overtime? You need absolute visual evidence to overturn a decision made on the ice-if i was NO i think i would be a tad upset.

There is an angle which ESPN did not show much of for some reason (they kept going between two angles which were much more inconclusive on the broadcast). This one shows that the puck was indeed over the line.

http://mgoblog.com/content/zapruder-goal
 
Re: RPI 2010-2011 VI- Red Dead Redemption

There is an angle which ESPN did not show much of for some reason (they kept going between two angles which were much more inconclusive on the broadcast). This one shows that the puck was indeed over the line.

http://mgoblog.com/content/zapruder-goal

I'm glad I'm not the only one who wondered why the hell they only showed that angle about twice in two hours, when that view had the most conclusive evidence. I suppose because then they couldn't shout 'Conspiracy!' as loud...
 
Re: RPI 2010-2011 VI- Red Dead Redemption

I try to stay positive with college athletes because they are unpaid amateurs, but today Foss undid all of the progress he made this year and cemented himself as my least favorite RPI hockey player ever. Despite Kennedy being a solid defenseman, I believe that next year will be like this year was on defense, i.e. addition by subtraction. Like last year's senior defensemen, he is slow, has no offense, doesn't use his size to its full advantage, and makes bad decisions, but he takes all of those qualities to their extremes.
 
Re: RPI 2010-2011 VI- Red Dead Redemption

You guys had a great season, and there's no reason to hang your heads. You made the Big Dance and "done good." I'm sure you will be giving us the yipes next season after our ECAC tourney series a few weeks ago. You just ran into a buzzsaw today. Good luck down the road :)
 
Re: RPI 2010-2011 VI- Red Dead Redemption

I try to stay positive with college athletes because they are unpaid amateurs, but today Foss undid all of the progress he made this year and cemented himself as my least favorite RPI hockey player ever. Despite Kennedy being a solid defenseman, I believe that next year will be like this year was on defense, i.e. addition by subtraction. Like last year's senior defensemen, he is slow, has no offense, doesn't use his size to its full advantage, and makes bad decisions, but he takes all of those qualities to their extremes.
What He said !!!!!
 
Back
Top