What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

RPI 2009 - 2010 Part II: I Believe in Seth Appert

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: RPI 2009 - 2010 Part II: I Believe in Seth Appert

FlagDUDE08 said:
I think that I am very glad my participation in RPISPORT-L went at the same time my traditional .edu address did.
Click to expand...

If you want to see something truly disturbing, look up "Hockey Jockey" on Urban Dictionary, which apparently is Ralph's favorite site and everything on there is true.
 
Re: RPI 2009 - 2010 Part II: I Believe in Seth Appert

Red Cloud said:
If you want to see something truly disturbing, look up "Hockey Jockey" on Urban Dictionary, which apparently is Ralph's favorite site and everything on there is true.
Click to expand...

It isn't my favorite site at all. It's just a good place to help translate what people a generation or so younger than me write. :p
 
Re: RPI 2009 - 2010 Part II: I Believe in Seth Appert

miker said:
Shawn Grant (volunteer) Cornell...Ian Burt was there last year. (volunteer)
Click to expand...

As oppose as I am to doing the knuckledraggers work for him, here's some more:
Union - Jason Tapp (Volunteer)
Q'pac - Justin Eddy
Gate - Jason Lefevre
Harvard - Bruce Irving
Brown - Brian Eklund
SLU - Andrew Allan
Yale - Formerly some no-name guy Richter, now some guy named Allain:p
D'mouth - Some guy named Gaudet, but he was mediocre as a player, so he'll never be any good as a coach

I could go on, but the ref has called the fight...:D
 
Re: RPI 2009 - 2010 Part II: I Believe in Seth Appert

Wicked Slappaahs said:
As oppose as I am to doing the knuckledraggers work for him, here's some more:
Union - Jason Tapp (Volunteer)
Q'pac - Justin Eddy
Gate - Jason Lefevre
Harvard - Bruce Irving
Brown - Brian Eklund
SLU - Andrew Allan
Yale - Formerly some no-name guy Richter, now some guy named Allain:p
D'mouth - Some guy named Gaudet, but he was mediocre as a player, so he'll never be any good as a coach

I could go on, but the ref has called the fight...:D
Click to expand...

So that accounts for everyone but Princeton. I suspect that is still Neil Little. Who, he? ;)
 
Re: RPI 2009 - 2010 Part II: I Believe in Seth Appert

hockeymascot said:
I don't know where you got the impression it was a fight? I merely asked a question, and thank you for the answer beyond expectations!!
Click to expand...

Generally speaking, when a post is followed by symbols such as :D , it is meant to express humor or levity, i.e. I WAS KIDDING! :p
 
Re: RPI 2009 - 2010 Part II: I Believe in Seth Appert

RobTricks said:
Not what I said. This was not a black and white situation. Is there no room for nuance in your world?
Click to expand...

You can nuance yourself to death for all I care, knock yourself out. I stated my opinion on the matter. You can declare your "facts" all you like, thats why we're all here Tricky.
 
Re: RPI 2009 - 2010 Part II: I Believe in Seth Appert

hockeymascot said:
I don't know where you got the impression it was a fight? I merely asked a question, and thank you for the answer beyond expectations!!
Click to expand...

You're off a touch. Neurons dying a slow, painful death?
 
Re: RPI 2009 - 2010 Part II: I Believe in Seth Appert

engineerhockeyfan said:
Now can't we all just get along. :D
Click to expand...

We can. It's a real simple process, if people would just follow simple guidelines.

1) Don't make outlandish statements about things you don't know anything about.

2) Don't attack people who are making reasonable statements about things they DO know something about.

3) Don't be overly optimistic or pessimistic. Neither are productive.

4) Don't provoke Red Cloud.

Follow these rules, and you'll never ever, ever have a problem with me. Follow them not, and somehow I'm the arse.

Happy Thanksgiving, everyone.
 
Re: RPI 2009 - 2010 Part II: I Believe in Seth Appert

GreatLakerMohawk said:
Good call.

Andrew Martin in Alford's freshman season got a time split similar to what Lange and York had last year. That's sort of, semi-fair, but to that end... Really? A Fairfield pick off the scrap heap when they folded gets to carry the load? Dumb.

Then, yes, the following year Alford was supplanted by freshman Lange with Lange playing 35 out of 40 games.

Inexcusable.
Click to expand...

It isn't a question of being fair. Who gives you a better chance to win? Fridgen thought Lange was better. Alford had a lot of potential coming to RPI, but he certainly didn't live up the hype. I am sure Fridgen was as disappointed as anyone. But to blame Fridgen for Alford letting in soft goals is just wrong. I attended most of RPI's home games and Lange was better. JA would make some great saves then ughhh. You could see the game change right there. It wasn't all Alford's fault. A good team would rally and a weak team would fold. Unfortunately, the engineer's folded.
Seth will use York more than 75%. Won't he?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top