Allow me to reprase and elaborate...
That was distressing to watch.
No offense whatsoever. Someone mentioned that RIT played pretty even through the first 5-10 minutes of the first period. I disagree. If it weren't for the consecutive power plays (and the 14 seconds of 5-on-3) during which the Tigers piled up a quick 5 shots on goal, they only generated 1 other shot through the entire first period, which appeared to me to be credited to RIT despite actually coming off an errant pass off a Raider stick from the opposite end of the ice (maybe they were crediting an actual RIT shot from earlier that they had missed, but it went on the board after an "own-shot"). So if you throw out the 3:36 of power play that actually went well, the Tigers' offense was absent the entire rest of the first period. I can only distinctly remember a couple other times where the Tigers gained and retained possession in the Colgate zone for any extended time to generate multiple shots through the rest of the game.
Given the complete lack of offense, it is almost surprising how few shots Colgate actually generated. 36 is a fair number, but with the complete lack of attack time RIT had, one would expect Colgate to have been on the attack for 40 -50 minutes. The Raiders played well, but either RIT was doing something right defensively or Colgate isn't that strong offensively either. They should have been able to pile up 50 or more shots. I'm not going to claim that it was a defensive masterpiece, but it could have been much worse. They definitely lapsed a few times and took a few dumb penalties (nothing new there), but the rest of the time didn't appear quite as pourous as last season.
And of course if it weren't for Ruby, it could have easily been 6, 7, or more 'Gate goals.
While I am trying to take some positives from that listless performance, it still was not good. Fortunately, it's only one game and they have time to fix whatever was wrong last night, but if they don't, they won't win too many games in or out of conference this season.