Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year
I know what the rule is. I wasn't one of the people that said it should be a penalty shot. I knew there would be a face-off in their zone (penalty or not) and 4 seconds is more than enough time to win a draw and get the puck on net. If you read my posts I blamed the loss on all sorts of reasons not solely on this blown call. I have plenty of respect for people's opinions and would have willingly engaged in a more civilized conversation about the lines, the power play, the play of Niagara, the misconduct penalty etc. But instead I am attacked and accused of wrapping my own ego up in the play of RIT because I dared say anything bad about the team and think OOC games matter more than you do. I know people work very hard for the program and I am glad they do but that doesn't mean I have to shower the team in sunshine and kisses.
Maybe you don't realize it but you come across as a real a-hole when you "disagree" with someone. Maybe I do too. Maybe you were just quoting me but venting about others, whatever. I don't want to fill this board up with our little ****ing contest. So it's best to just agree to disagree. I think the play of RIT against OOC opponents, coupled with our spotty goal scoring might spell a little trouble for us at the end of the year. You don't, fine. That's the point I was trying to make the whole time. Next time try engaging me in a conversation about the team instead of accusing me of trying to live vicariously through them.
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2009-2010 <<<<< Rockin' The Ritter For Another Year
Forgive me for busting out the rulebook, I knew it was dangerous. However what you may or may not know is that I am a baseball umpire. Learning the rules to the game has always been, kind of important to me. And I think it’s very embarrassing to go arguing against a call when you’ve made it perfectly clear that you don’t know the rules. Perhaps I take that a little too personally because I have dealt with punks like you all the time on the diamond.
I know what the rule is. I wasn't one of the people that said it should be a penalty shot. I knew there would be a face-off in their zone (penalty or not) and 4 seconds is more than enough time to win a draw and get the puck on net. If you read my posts I blamed the loss on all sorts of reasons not solely on this blown call. I have plenty of respect for people's opinions and would have willingly engaged in a more civilized conversation about the lines, the power play, the play of Niagara, the misconduct penalty etc. But instead I am attacked and accused of wrapping my own ego up in the play of RIT because I dared say anything bad about the team and think OOC games matter more than you do. I know people work very hard for the program and I am glad they do but that doesn't mean I have to shower the team in sunshine and kisses.
Maybe you don't realize it but you come across as a real a-hole when you "disagree" with someone. Maybe I do too. Maybe you were just quoting me but venting about others, whatever. I don't want to fill this board up with our little ****ing contest. So it's best to just agree to disagree. I think the play of RIT against OOC opponents, coupled with our spotty goal scoring might spell a little trouble for us at the end of the year. You don't, fine. That's the point I was trying to make the whole time. Next time try engaging me in a conversation about the team instead of accusing me of trying to live vicariously through them.
Last edited: