What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

>>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Re: A skeptic no more

Re: A skeptic no more

To my utter dismay, my kid's decided to matriculate into the Hromi (sp?) Center for Quality and Applied Statistics, and been wearing a disgusting orange T-shirt he got at the Colgate game. RITProf, any dirt on the program?

I also just wrote my first check to RIT ... I feel so dirty. Hopefully they'll put the money to good use, and break ground on a new barn :}

We drove up for the AHA tourney, and what a stark contrast in the skill level from 5 years ago. Anyone who watches the team in person, and isn't impressed with what the program's done despite the scholarship handicap is hopelessly biased. BTW - Has Remy finally admitted he was wrong?

Well played RIT! (Go EC!)

Welcome to the "Orange" side. I just hope neither of my daughters decide to go to EC!!:p

Thanks for the nice comments on hockey. The Tigers and quality of play sure have come a long way from the DIII days.

The stats program is very good and should serve your son well. The faculty tend to be very involved with industry and do a lot of consulting projects (whether that is good or bad is another debate). That keeps them connected to the real world and real applications. Some of my students take grad electives from that program and they are quite happy with the courses (and seem to actually learn useful stuff). If one of mine wanted to go through that stats program one day, I wouldn't hesitate at all to encourage her, etc.

Keep writing those checks (I'm sure you could donate for the arena as well!) and good luck to your son.
 
Re: A skeptic no more

Re: A skeptic no more

The faculty tend to be very involved with industry and do a lot of consulting projects (whether that is good or bad is another debate).
The level of industry involvement is what actually sold him on the program, and thanks for the advice. With better access to tickets, hopefully I'll get to make more games next season, and have the opportunity to meet you and the other faithful. Thanks again.
 
Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Excellent! He'll be in the right place. Look forward to seeing you both in the Ritter next year.
 
Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

an RIT alum pal asked me to throw this together, so i figured I'd pass it along on here:

RIT Photos from East Regional
 
Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

We were in danger of slipping down to page 3 so I thought I'd bump this back to the top. Heck don't want folks accusing us of losing interest in Tigers Hockey.

Has anyone at WITR thought about the possibility of putting the Albany and DetRoIT games out as podcasts? The rewind of the UNH game was awesome. I think I heard pieces of Eds lungs hitting the microphone on those goal calls. I'd love to be able to listen to those "historic" games in their entirety. Heck, I'd even be willing to pay for them. :eek:
 
Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

There where so many hanging curves I could have hit out of the park, but I will focus on this one...

Talk about extrapolating a rule from the exception. Nearly all of the RIT hockey players are here for an education.

Thats why so many of them are taking Hotel Management and Packaging Science??? As I said education is important but your spilting hairs with reality. With big time talent comes risk of getting bad eggs it happens and it already happen at RIT when it was a D-III program. An embarassing incident lead to a suspension for most of the 01-02 team. It happens, these are young men and they sometimes make rash decisions. The important thing is how the organization handles these situation, RIT has passed in every test of character to this point. I had very much respect for how Wilson handled that and am sure they can handle bigger talent.

Are you related to Al Simone? We have move to D-I the object is to get better and attract better talent. If the threat that we may threaten your over liberal view of intercollegiate athletics than I suggest you head south to Geneseo....Wait!!! They've been hit with NCAA violations oh shot!!! Guess you have to go West to Brockport, ENJOY!!!! ;) :D
 
Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

There where so many hanging curves I could have hit out of the park, but I will focus on this one...



Thats why so many of them are taking Hotel Management and Packaging Science??? As I said education is important but your spilting hairs with reality. With big time talent comes risk of getting bad eggs it happens and it already happen at RIT when it was a D-III program. An embarassing incident lead to a suspension for most of the 01-02 team. It happens, these are young men and they sometimes make rash decisions. The important thing is how the organization handles these situation, RIT has passed in every test of character to this point. I had very much respect for how Wilson handled that and am sure they can handle bigger talent.

Are you related to Al Simone? We have move to D-I the object is to get better and attract better talent. If the threat that we may threaten your over liberal view of intercollegiate athletics than I suggest you head south to Geneseo....Wait!!! They've been hit with NCAA violations oh shot!!! Guess you have to go West to Brockport, ENJOY!!!! ;) :D


Whoa, whoa, what do you have against hotel management???
 
Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Whoa, whoa, what do you have against hotel management???

They probably stuck him in the inn when he was a student :p
 
Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Thats why so many of them are taking Hotel Management and Packaging Science???
Point taken. However, I never asserted that they came here to get Micro-Electronic Engineering degrees. I just said they were here to get an education... and I'll add the qualifier that I did not previously... in addition to getting to play D-I hockey (which is prioritized over the other is another question). Just because they may not be (or want to be) as disciplined and dedicated academically as those of us with engineering degrees, does not mean that the education wasn't important (at least at some level) to them. And I know that those two majors (along with Business Administration) get bad raps, but they still are college degree programs majored in by many in the general student body. So they are getting an education, whatever you or anyone else may think of it.

As I said education is important but your spilting hairs with reality. With big time talent comes risk of getting bad eggs it happens and it already happen at RIT when it was a D-III program. An embarassing incident lead to a suspension for most of the 01-02 team. It happens, these are young men and they sometimes make rash decisions. The important thing is how the organization handles these situation, RIT has passed in every test of character to this point. I had very much respect for how Wilson handled that and am sure they can handle bigger talent.

Tangents aside... Where are you going with this?
I never once commented on the behavior of college hockey players. But as long as you brought it up...
Are you implying that the more talented an athlete is, the more trouble he/she will get into? I don't follow. All (okay, MOST) college students are young men (and women) who will make multiple bad decisions throughout their time in school. I'm not sure how the individual's athletic talent is related to how often he/she will get into trouble.
I, too respect the manner in which this staff has handled such situations, be it in D-III or D-I. As a side note, if I remember correctly, I think those players in the incident you mentioned were guys that weren't recruited by Coach Wilson, but by Coach Hoffberg, a coach whose tenure, rumor has it, was apparently known for recruiting less than choir-boy type players who weren't very concerned with academics. The best part of Coach Wilson's legacy here is his focus on quality individuals who excel at both academics and hockey, and the fortitude to discipline any who break the rules regardless of potential impact on the ice.

Are you related to Al Simone?

No. But I don't totally disagree with his view on what big-time athletics can do to the academic reputation of a university. That's not to say I'm not in support of the move to D-I, but if RIT were to try and go "big-time" and become a BC, Michigan, Minnesota, etc... I'd be worried... at least about the potential diminished perception of our school if nothing else. I'm not only proud to have been a fan of RIT Hockey for 25+ years, but I'm also proud that I have an undergraduate degree from RIT, I have a Graduate Certificate from RIT, and I am currently working on a Masters Degree from RIT. It would bother me if at some point in the future, our school was seen in the same light as the University of Miami, Fl (which may in reality be a fine school for all I know, but its reputation is mostly derived from what everyone knows about the athletics, football in particular). Of course that is an extreme case and even if RIT became an elite D-I hockey power, they wouldn't even scratch the surface of programs like Miami in reputation, but you get the point of what I mean.

We have move to D-I the object is to get better and attract better talent. If the threat that we may threaten your over liberal view of intercollegiate athletics than I suggest you head south to Geneseo....Wait!!! They've been hit with NCAA violations oh shot!!! Guess you have to go West to Brockport, ENJOY!!!! ;) :D

You may be the first person to refer to a view of mine as "liberal" since I was an impressionable undergrad who almost fell for all the propaganda colleges spew at young skulls full of mush to try and indoctrinate them in the left-wing agenda. I got a chuckle out of it.
If you're attempting to imply that only crappy D-III teams could possibly be following all the rules and making their players go to class, I'd be willing to debate that with you another day (ahem...Duke just won another D-I national championship in one of the biggest corrupted college sports out there)
 
Last edited:
Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

They probably stuck him in the inn when he was a student :p

No Worst Raquet Club...But I did have a "romantic encounter" with a girl who was stuck at the Inn...

TigerFan86-87, first off you use to many words, and that coming from me is an accomplishment. I refer you to first line in your reponse to my quote.

to grow and become better, but not at the expense of the academic integrity of our well respected institution

The only way that RIT will lose their integrity or respect is if they let it happen. They should evaluate the charactor of the player before he comes here. Wilson already has done that, I have heard rumors from more than one reliable sources that he has past on some players who have gone on to other college hockey teams because he felt like they were to risky. In a lot of cases he been proven right too.

I just will never accept that arguement some used against going D-I because it might corrupt this fantasy world they live in about the student athlete. You may not be purosely expressing that view but you are at least inadvertently advocating it.

There are plenty of big names D-I schools that have kept their insitutions integrity and high standards and won championships. I also do not have a problem with a player who may have a slightly more focus on athletics then school, so long as he is meeting acadamic requirements.

Bottom line, RIT is committed to excellence on and off the ice. They should try to get the best players they can to come to RIT, but those players should know that RIT is no push over school and they will have to work. And most importantly that they will be held to the high standards that their predecessors were held too. Fear of what could go wrong should not hold us back, we should beleive in our ability to have integrity. "You can not explore new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore..."
 
Last edited:
Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Thats why so many of them are taking Hotel Management and Packaging Science???

No Hotel Management majors on this past season's roster.
And before you knock packaging science, the guys who invented bubble wrap and styrofoam peanuts are probably doing pretty well.

RIT has 15 Business and Business Related students, 1 Criminal Justice, 3 Biomedicine, 3 Packaging Science, 1 Civil Engineering Tech, and 1 Science Exploration.
 
Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

No Hotel Management majors on this past season's roster.
And before you knock packaging science, the guys who invented bubble wrap and styrofoam peanuts are probably doing pretty well.

RIT has 15 Business and Business Related students, 1 Criminal Justice, 3 Biomedicine, 3 Packaging Science, 1 Civil Engineering Tech, and 1 Science Exploration.

And just an FYI, it's not Hotel Management, it's Hospitality and Service Management
 
Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

No. But I don't totally disagree with his view on what big-time athletics can do to the academic reputation of a university. That's not to say I'm not in support of the move to D-I, but if RIT were to try and go "big-time" and become a BC, Michigan, Minnesota, etc... I'd be worried... at least about the potential diminished perception of our school if nothing else. I'm not only proud to have been a fan of RIT Hockey for 25+ years, but I'm also proud that I have an undergraduate degree from RIT, I have a Graduate Certificate from RIT, and I am currently working on a Masters Degree from RIT. It would bother me if at some point in the future, our school was seen in the same light as the University of Miami, Fl (which may in reality be a fine school for all I know, but its reputation is mostly derived from what everyone knows about the athletics, football in particular). Of course that is an extreme case and even if RIT became an elite D-I hockey power, they wouldn't even scratch the surface of programs like Miami in reputation, but you get the point of what I mean.

You have to earn a diminished perception of the school, I believe. There are plenty of examples both good and bad of school reputation and athletics. When done the right way, the athletics can INCREASE the perception of the school. That Mark Cornacchia (sp?) had the best GPA of anyone in the Frozen Four helps there.

Being a top flight program will increase the spotlight on how the school does things, but with a dilligent program it can shine like a beacon. You don't see athletics diminishing Duke's or Syracuse's reputation. Or for a school that is a 1 sport D1 program Johns Hopkins.
 
Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

And I think Tommy's spelling DOES diminish the academic integrity of RIT. :D :D :cool:
 
Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

No. But I don't totally disagree with his view on what big-time athletics can do to the academic reputation of a university. That's not to say I'm not in support of the move to D-I, but if RIT were to try and go "big-time" and become a BC, Michigan, Minnesota, etc... I'd be worried... at least about the potential diminished perception of our school if nothing else. there)

Are you really worried about RIT having an academic reputation similar to BC, Michigan or Minnesota?
 
Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Are you really worried about RIT having an academic reputation similar to BC, Michigan or Minnesota?

OK, using other hockey schools that aren't "Miami-like" may have been a poor example as BC and Michigan don't exactly have too much of a problem in that respect (last week's BC hockey player mishap notwithstanding), although Minnesota has been on probation in the recent past (not for hockey). But there is the fact that when you mention the elite programs like that, most people immediately think of the sports teams first, then maybe the academics. And if the football and or basketball teams have long rap sheets, or at least a couple newsworthy incidents, that is the impression everyone gets of that school. Honestly, I know little to nothing about the academic side of schools like Wisconsin, Minnesota, Penn State, Illinois, Washington, Oklahoma, Nebraska, UCLA, etc..., despite knowing all I need to about their sports teams.
In considering everyone's rebuttals, I don't truly believe this is going to happen to RIT even if we do someday join a real conference and become consistently competitive with the big boys of hockey. I suppose I was theorizing way beyond the scope of what could really happen here. We're not going to be the next Miami or Florida State. Butler, maybe (which is a good thing).

and btw, Tom...
I don't live in a fantasy world about college sports. I'm not an idiot. I know what really goes on.
All I was trying to say originally before we got off on other random topics (in so many words :p ) is... RIT's program is a little more special to root for in that they have the opportunity to achieve the things they have while not being a Minnesota or Wisconsin-like program. As opposed to programs in that echelon where many of the players are there simply as a step towards the NHL (or so they hope), RIT's players for the most part probably know that after a short minor-pro career at best, they'll have to get into the real work world. Hence, the smart ones (which as you and I both pointed out are the ones Wilson goes after) really should (and do) understand that they're here to get an education while they're playing.

And to all of you who are a bit ;) younger than I... I tend to write my posts as though I am actually writing (I know, a lost art). While I certainly don't claim to be Shakespeare or anything, I'm just not yet part of the "texting" world (I imagine I won't have a choice eventually) where many words are abbreviated, sentences shortened, spelling ignored, and grammar out the window. Even in a venue like this, I try to write somewhat properly, and do so every once in a while. So if you don't like the wordiness... tough bananas. :p :p
 
Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

And to all of you who are a bit ;) younger than I... I tend to write my posts as though I am actually writing (I know, a lost art). While I certainly don't claim to be Shakespeare or anything, I'm just not yet part of the "texting" world (I imagine I won't have a choice eventually) where many words are abbreviated, sentences shortened, spelling ignored, and grammar out the window. Even in a venue like this, I try to write somewhat properly, and do so every once in a while. So if you don't like the wordiness... tough bananas. :p :p

While I appreciate your intent here, the four emoticons in three paragraphs-not counting the two in your sig- belie your point. The correct spelling and grammar are, however, a welcome relief from the posts of one certain individual. :rolleyes:

And if we examine your other point, when a list of "organizations" that excel in hockey include all of the Ivy league, RPI and Colgate, I'm not too concerned with our academic reputation diminishing with our on-ice success.
 
Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

When done the right way, the athletics can INCREASE the perception of the school. That Mark Cornacchia (sp?) had the best GPA of anyone in the Frozen Four helps there.

Yes. That was definitely a plus, but it was also followed by the irony of him being tossed from the Wisconsin game about a minute after the academic award was announced at Ford Field!:eek:
 
Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

No Hotel Management majors on this past season's roster.
And before you knock packaging science, the guys who invented bubble wrap and styrofoam peanuts are probably doing pretty well.

Ask anyone at my office I HATE Styrofoam Peanuts! :mad: :mad: :mad:

I have to ship equipment all over the US that I build and Peanuts get everywhere.

BTW, if you check the Alumni Asspciation announcements on face book, there is an RIT alumni who started a pole dancing "fitness" business in Fairport I believe. I don't think it said what degree she earned though...Sounds like Hospitality and Service Management to me :D :D :D
 
Last edited:
Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

Re: >>>>RIT 2010 Offseason Thread-"You have to be a genius to go to RIT"

And I think Tommy's spelling DOES diminish the academic integrity of RIT. :D :D :cool:

Hey I have been really good <b>latley</b>... :D

The Liberal Art School does want it known that I was not a liberal art major , however sadly I got a minor in Liberal Art for communication as required for my degree. Complete waste of my time...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top