Re: Recruiting Promises - Kept and Not Kept
To the extent that it is true of all who populate the earth, then I agree. To single out coaches and make them sound flawed in particular, I believe goes too far. These coaches have 20 some kids at once, and they are trying to look out for the interest of all of them plus the team as a whole. If you had 20 kids, would you be as effective as a parent? Coaches like their players, they want them to experience success, and they have a genuine interest in all of them. Do they make mistakes? Absolutely. Are there some teams that become totally dysfunctional? Yes, there are. But it's my belief that the lion's share of the coaches are sincerely trying to be fair, albeit with human failings. They may not see a situation as you or I would, but many of these aren't absolutes where one path is right and another wrong. Like any group, some are better than others, but I've been impressed with the caliber of people that I've met.
I wouldn't go so far as to say coaches as a group are necessarily any more flawed than other groups. And yes I know of some who really are terrific both as human beings and leaders, as well as some who are average to mediocre at one or the other, and a few whom I really would not wish on my worst enemy.
But where you and I would seem to disagree is the premise that college coaches are even mostly, like good (or at least well-intentioned) parents, all looking out for the team family as a whole, and also for the interests--genuine or otherwise-- of each of the 20+ individually as well. While this would be desirable, and might be expected by outsiders given their important leadership role, I can say with certainty that to think this always or even usually occurs is extraordinarily naive. Wanting all the individuals on a team to experience success on or off the ice? growth? emotional well-being? Not even close, in many cases.
Many coaches have a self-interest or self-absorption which trumps what is best for the collective group they oversee, and their interest in their charges' development and well-being may not extend beyond a very select few (from which they can bask in reflected glory?)
As I have alluded to before in another thread, I believe the problem is two-fold: living in a culture which tends to deify sports and its coaches at the college level, distort their successes and talents to mythological proportions...and turning a blind eye to very real personal or professional failings because we can't deal with having our bubble burst about reality which doesn't totally jive with the vaunted image (eg. think Joe Paterno situation recently in the news), and two, (perhaps related) college coaches generally work in an environment where their performance is not subject to an semblance of a normal annual performance review process (much less, being evaluated based on 360 degree feedback annually), and their power is absolute.
While I generally agree with your point of view on most issues, perhaps it is the above that may also account for our very different perspectives in this case. I'm guessing your interactions with college coaches are based on your brief conversations with them (or players) based on the image they present to the outside, combined with strong positive halo effect in our culture, rather than working with/for them directly at length. My perspective is based on direct feedback from literally dozens of student athletes speaking in confidence, based on their direct experiences....often many years after their college careers have finished. Once removed in a safe environment, they have no reason any longer to sugar coat the behind the scenes realities.
Regardless of ones basic merits as a human being to begin with, working in such an environment is highly conducive to abuses of power, so it would not be surprising to find more dysfunctional leadership than one might find in many business settings as an example, or among well-equiped parents of large families.
In many cases, that is a big part of the reason certain programs have greater difficulty recruiting than many have occurred in the past, regardless of surface appearances based on their record of success.