What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

BassAle said:
Marco Rubio says “hold my beer”



I other words the GOP is reserving the right to impeach a democrat for less
Click to expand...

Beautiful. There it is. God forbid they ever get control again in the House with a Democrat in the White House.
 
dxmnkd316 said:
Holy ****. I think I'm having a stroke. Because I couldn't have read that correctly.
Click to expand...

You did.

When Hovey answered my earlier comment, it was certainly well thought out but wasn’t actually what I was referencing. I am more curious why more conservatives aren’t saying it’s wrong what trump did. Why quid pro quo’s and everything else he’s doing is wrong. We have a few on here who I know don’t like trump but they’re pretty silent on the things he actually does. Which, I guess, in my mind is separate from impeachment trial but i wasn’t clear
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

Basically what it comes down to is this is just another thing they can say wait for the election. Which means elections matter. Which means, wake the **** UP Democrats and start voting instead of sitting your butt hurt *** down on the couch on election day.
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

So Since Romney said “**** you mitch, I’m voting for witnesses” Moscow Mitch could only let one of Collins or Murkowski vote for witnesses. I guess this means they think Susan needed this more.
 
BassAle said:
So Since Romney said “**** you mitch, I’m voting for witnesses” Moscow Mitch could only let one of Collins or Murkowski vote for witnesses. I guess this means they think Susan needed this more.
Click to expand...
I don’t think this saves Susan.
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
Because of course.

“ BREAKING: The Environmental Protection Agency has re-approved a chemical used in Bayer's Roundup weed killer, claiming it doesn’t pose a danger to humans despite thousands of lawsuits from farmers attributing cancer to the common herbicide.”
Click to expand...

This is very good news. We need to get the safeties removed from guns, too.
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

Some people need to understand this.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Head shaking serious columnists. If one side votes essentially along party lines to do the right thing and one party votes to prevent it, that doesn’t mean the process is sadly partisan. It means one party is bad. (Cont’d)</p>— John Hodgman (@hodgman) <a href="https://twitter.com/hodgman/status/1223235733345001473?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 31, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

BassAle said:
In other words the GOP is reserving the right to impeach a democrat for less
Click to expand...

If the GOP is ever in the position to remove a Dem from office they will do so. Ever since Garland we've known they removed their last scintilla of democratic principle.

We're in bed with a psychopath. Our choices are a no contact order and a safe divorce, have him hauled away to prison, or poison him.

I recommend the latter. It's the only way to be sure.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

I don’t see how this helps Murkowski. She’s already hated by the far right of the party and has now alienated her one solid group of support. Plus, she’s now almost guaranteed a worthy Dem challenger in 2022.
 
Jimjamesak said:
I don’t see how this helps Murkowski. She’s already hated by the far right of the party and has now alienated her one solid group of support. Plus, she’s now almost guaranteed a worthy Dem challenger in 2022.
Click to expand...

It’s just that Susan needed it more. If Mitt had been a good boy both Susan and Lisa would have been allowed to break rank.
 
BassAle said:
It’s just that Susan needed it more. If Mitt had been a good boy both Susan and Lisa would have been allowed to break rank.
Click to expand...
Looking at the map, it’s bad long term thinking with the Republicans pretty much on defense everywhere in that election, adding a fight in Alaska is not a great idea.
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

Jimjamesak said:
Looking at the map, it’s bad long term thinking with the Republicans pretty much on defense everywhere in that election, adding a fight in Alaska is not a great idea.
Click to expand...

Will it be a serious challenge? I thought the only way the good guys ever have a chance in AK is if the GOP primary loser runs as an Indy and we have a three-way.
 
Jimjamesak said:
I don’t see how this helps Murkowski. She’s already hated by the far right of the party and has now alienated her one solid group of support. Plus, she’s now almost guaranteed a worthy Dem challenger in 2022.
Click to expand...

Does Alaska actually have a chance to be purple, or would she just get primary’d?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top