What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS: A Sharpie Is Always Needed

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS: A Sharpie Is Always Needed

qualified me for membership in MENSA

whoopty doo, my SAT scores would qualify me

the problem is when you're smart[er than the average dumb-***] but not smart enough to realize there are plenty of things you don't understand

compared to the scientists I work with I regularly feel like a dumb-***
 
Re: POTUS: A Sharpie Is Always Needed

whoopty doo, my SAT scores would qualify me

the problem is when you're smart[er than the average dumb-***] but not smart enough to realize there are plenty of things you don't understand

compared to the scientists I work with I regularly feel like a dumb-***

Can't help myself- You know the line about being brilliant but can't tie shoes? plenty of genius folk are great at literal thinking and calculation but dealing with conceptual or inferential thinking is a struggle.

Whether it is believable or not it is not a piece of outlying evidence. It fits into the narrative in a large block of evidence presented by multiple people who have no problem with veracity. The only people that actually don't believe the Ruskies getting their predigested critical thinking from Faux and their ilk
 
Re: POTUS: A Sharpie Is Always Needed

And yet you apparently don't know what an inference is, even though you should've learned that in junior high.

I'm smart enough to know an inference involves reasoning.
And reasoning inherently involves the biases of the reasoner because they are human.

Two different people can reach different inferences on a situation based on their different patterns of reasoning with the available evidence.

There's a parked car missing a wheel. I may reason and infer "flat tire"; someone else may reason and infer "stolen". Until we know, we don't know who inferred correctly.
 
Re: POTUS: A Sharpie Is Always Needed

I'm smart enough to know an inference involves reasoning.
And reasoning inherently involves the biases of the reasoner because they are human.

Two different people can reach different inferences on a situation based on their different patterns of reasoning with the available evidence.

There's a parked car missing a wheel. I may reason and infer "flat tire"; someone else may reason and infer "stolen". Until we know, we don't know who inferred correctly.

Except they have shown the people stealing the wheel, talking about stealing the wheel, had people tweeting about stealing the wheel. Showed a pattern of behaviour that would help you infer they stole the wheel. At what point to you stop pretending the wheel is not off because of a flat tyre?
 
Re: POTUS: A Sharpie Is Always Needed

Except they have shown the people stealing the wheel, talking about stealing the wheel, had people tweeting about stealing the wheel. Showed a pattern of behaviour that would help you infer they stole the wheel. At what point to you stop pretending the wheel is not off because of a flat tyre?

When he gets that manilla envelope...
 
Except they have shown the people stealing the wheel, talking about stealing the wheel, had people tweeting about stealing the wheel. Showed a pattern of behaviour that would help you infer they stole the wheel. At what point to you stop pretending the wheel is not off because of a flat tyre?

Ding!
 
Re: POTUS: A Sharpie Is Always Needed

Believing that means believing Dana Rohrabacher.
And Assange's attorney.
And Assange.

There's a credibility trifecta.

Is this enough manila envelope for you?

https://lawandcrime.com/awkward/interview-from-3-years-ago-appears-to-corroborate-assange-lawyers-claims-of-trump-pardon-dangling/

Rohrabacher previously told Los Angeles media—in September 2017–that he took part in a “confidential interaction” with the White House—in order to secure Assange a deal. The deal Rohrabacher described involved making Assange’s legal troubles go away in exchange for information that could exonerate Trump and the Trump campaign during the Russia probe.
The news outlet asked Rohrabacher if Assange was asking for a pardon as a part of a potential deal, but he would only say discussions were “confidential.”
Former federal prosecutor Richard Signorelli called the upshot here: “This is called corroboration of Assange’s attorney proffer of corrupt pardon promise by Trump.”
 
Re: POTUS: A Sharpie Is Always Needed

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Are you ****ing kidding me?! This is a joke, right? Does Grenell have even an iota of an intelligence background? <a href="https://t.co/BshN8BFB59">https://t.co/BshN8BFB59</a></p>— Daniel W. Drezner (@dandrezner) <a href="https://twitter.com/dandrezner/status/1230263855034572800?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 19, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Are you ****ing kidding me?! This is a joke, right? Does Grenell have even an iota of an intelligence background? <a href="https://t.co/BshN8BFB59">https://t.co/BshN8BFB59</a></p>— Daniel W. Drezner (@dandrezner) <a href="https://twitter.com/dandrezner/status/1230263855034572800?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 19, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Draining the swamp.
 
Re: POTUS: A Sharpie Is Always Needed

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamSerwer?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@AdamSerwer</a> essay is clear-eyed and perfectly accurate. The truly worrying thing about it, from my perspective, is the hesitancy of the media and the Democratic Party to directly confront the fact that we're now well down the authoritarian slope. <a href="https://t.co/zbbFCJqePc">https://t.co/zbbFCJqePc</a></p>— Will Wilkinson 🌐 (@willwilkinson) <a href="https://twitter.com/willwilkinson/status/1230195792163426304?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 19, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS: A Sharpie Is Always Needed

Wait, 29 composite ACT qualifies for Mensa? Holy **** have they lowered their standards. 29 is a **** score if you’re trying to measure true genius.

I know complete morons who got a 29 on the ACT: me

(In fairness to myself, that score was an outlier among my other scores.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top