What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

The sane is the center, Kep. Don't get me wrong.

AOC and Sanders are really left of center. I think Amy K and Pelosi are center. I think Obama was maybe a tick left of center, if that.

AOC and Sanders are Righties to Kepler. Kepler is the extreme they are normalized.

AOC is not as radical as you think she is. She just doesnt care about decorum. Which is fine because right now that is what is needed by the youth in the House. Her lack of decorum (which it really isnt but that is what rubs people the wrong way about her actions) calls attention to the right issues, at the right time, and in the correct way. She didnt just give a speech on the Concentration Camps, she friggin went there and called the people out firsthand. (poor butthurt Gestapo being dehumanized and all) She is doing her job.

The problem is most of the elected abdicated years ago. The Right quit like a French tank against the German Army. They bow to whoever Fearless Leader is and gave up decorum for power. Well AOC is the first Democrat to fight fire with fire. She is doing it the right way and she is on the right side of history on all of it.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">If only Paul Ryan was still in Congress, he'd tell him. I just know it.</p>— John Weaver (@jwgop) <a href="https://twitter.com/jwgop/status/1150514444121923585?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 14, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Both sides...
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.

Says the guy who posts the same thing over, and over, and over...

;) :D
 
I disagree. They're not as far left as Reagan was far right. Trickle Down Economic Theory has done more to destroy America than any other force in American History. It's not even close. He brought it to us and Turtle Boy and Paul Ryan just put the cherry on top of the sundae.

Nothing AOC or Bernie has proposed is even in the ballpark.

It should have worked, but human nature being what it is, the mandarins kept the money instead of letting more coin slip thru their fingers.

However, I am not in favor of creating a tax collection behemoth to redistribute wealth. That just keeps more $$$ in Washington (or WVA) that should go out to the taxpayers and picks winners and losers.
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

No it shouldnt have. Have you ever actually taken an Econ class or talked to anyone who worked in finance? Supply Side is a joke and was never supposed to work greed notwithstanding.

Must be painful to know Jesus was a Socialist :p
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

AOC and Sanders are Righties to Kepler. Kepler is the extreme they are normalized.

That's not quite fair. Yes, in my dream world Bernie is the center and Congressional debates concern whether (left) or not (right) to braise the rich before cooking them. But I recognize there is a legitimate place for a right in our country. Eisenhower was the true right. Buckley was the true far right. They both respected the rule of law. They'd both have confirmed Merrick Garland. They both understood the difference between a democracy-affirming faith and a theocracy-fevered zealotry.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

No it shouldnt have. Have you ever actually taken an Econ class or talked to anyone who worked in finance? Supply Side is a joke and was never supposed to work greed notwithstanding.

Must be painful to know Jesus was a Socialist :p

Jesus was a straight out Commie. Matthew 19:21

Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me.
 
Last edited:
It should have worked, but human nature being what it is, the mandarins kept the money instead of letting more coin slip thru their fingers.

However, I am not in favor of creating a tax collection behemoth to redistribute wealth. That just keeps more $$$ in Washington (or WVA) that should go out to the taxpayers and picks winners and losers.
Those poor, poor Republicans. It’s not their fault - who could have seen this failure of their good intentions coming? Oh, right - friggin everybody, including the Republicans themselves. They absolutely knew - wealth inequality was always a feature, never a bug. The fact that you’re still here pitching it as an unintended consequence speaks volumes about your inability to put reality before ideology.
 
Jesus was a straight out Commie. Matthew 19:21



Jesus answered, If you want to be perfect, go and sell your posessions, and invest in rental property to overcharge the poor, and you shall have treasure forever on Earth. Then come and follow me.
Trump 19:21
New Nationalist Version


*Edit* I really need to keep track of the changes I make, I think this is the third or fourth passage I've modified.
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

Brent, AOC is not radically to the left and no it wasn't that I didn't like your answers it's that you didn't answer too often.
 
You don't. And I'm not of that crowd. Some think I am. Some think others are. However, they refuse to even think about having a convo unless you are lock and step with them, and that's simply ridiculous. I'm not in the uber left crowd. That does not make me MAGA. It's not an either/or, and that is what frustrates me.
So, why don't you protest the MAGAs with the same vigor and vitriol you use for the "far left"? Instead, you're always going out of you way to find reasons for the way they feel and vote the way they do.

A luxury you never reserve for the "far left".
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

There are a lot of conservatives like Rube out there, who think MAGA goes too far by the same degree that say a 70% top marginal rate does.

A lot of these people voted for Dump in 2016 not for Dump but because they were genuinely afraid of Hillary. Either they thought she was radical left or they thought she was a security risk (buttery males).

The concentration camps and kleptocracy and sucking off Putin are too far even for them so they're thinking they might have to vote D this time. Naturally they would like to vote for a "Democrat" who is indistinguishable from Dubya but they understand that isn't possible so they are pushing for a George H W Bush solid righty because to them that really is the "center." You have to consider the source.

Accommodating these people is impossible. For one thing, the far right is latent in Reagan/Bush -- it is their natural evolution. Reagan begot Newt begot Dubya begot Dump. More importantly in the short term, favoring Rubes will turn off so many Democrats that Dump can make it close enough for Putin to steal it again. This is precisely what happened in 2016.

A winning Democratic party does not have a nominee Rube can live with.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

That's not quite fair. Yes, in my dream world Bernie is the center and Congressional debates concern whether (left) or not (right) to braise the rich before cooking them. But I recognize there is a legitimate place for a right in our country. Eisenhower was the true right. Buckley was the true far right. They both respected the rule of law. They'd both have confirmed Merrick Garland. They both understood the difference between a democracy-affirming faith and a theocracy-fevered zealotry.

You are the guy at parties who explains why jokes arent accurate arent ya ;)
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

Those poor, poor Republicans. It’s not their fault - who could have seen this failure of their good intentions coming? Oh, right - friggin everybody, including the Republicans themselves. They absolutely knew - wealth inequality was always a feature, never a bug. The fact that you’re still here pitching it as an unintended consequence speaks volumes about your inability to put reality before ideology.

Outside of people who Laffer pays the VAST majority of Economists correctly predicted where Supply Side would get us. But yeah joe is right it is greed not math that caused it to fail ;)
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

One thing: Anyone who does not do some door-knocking, phone bank calling, or other meaningful form of activism beyond just voting between now and November 2020 has nothing to complain about.
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

Hey guys Trump wasnt being racist...the "Squad" are Communists! See that makes it ok. Thanks for clearing it up Lindsay...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top