What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

Other than lying under oath? Seriously? That's a crime, therefore a criminal.

They should have been busted for Whitewater, IMO.

And Trump's a criminal, too. This isn't an either/or situation.

Good to see the centrist on the lock her up bandwagon. It's no wonder it's swept the country.
 
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

Notice I'm not saying "lock her up" at the current time.
 
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

Hey leftists, y'all need a new playbook. Trump supposedly won't accept the results of the 2020 election if he loses, and keep himself in office? This is exactly what you claimed in 2016, and is exactly what you're doing with all of these cries of wolf.
 
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Conservatives have spent over half a century disproving the claim that we are the stupid party. Now, under Trump, conservatism is embracing, indeed reveling in...stupidity. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/CPAC2019?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#CPAC2019</a></p>— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) <a href="https://twitter.com/BillKristol/status/1101123159984693248?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 28, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Bill's revelations now get credit only for stating the obvious. I guess what he doesn't realize is the Republicans never would have had any power at all if not for stupidity.
 
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

Hey leftists, y'all need a new playbook. Trump supposedly won't accept the results of the 2020 election if he loses, and keep himself in office? This is exactly what you claimed in 2016, and is exactly what you're doing with all of these cries of wolf.

It's only being discussed because Trump's lawyer testified about it yesterday. Otherwise it's not really a topic among leftists with the exception of a comedy show.
 
They should have been busted for Whitewater, IMO.
Because they partnered with an old family friend on some swamp land and the friend defrauded a whole bunch of people, including the Clinton's?

Didn't Ken Starr spend four years investigating *that* specific issue only to find Bill enjoyed a ******* from an intern?
 
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

Other than lying under oath? Seriously? That's a crime, therefore a criminal.

They should have been busted for Whitewater, IMO.

And Trump's a criminal, too. This isn't an either/or situation.

What should they have been busted for? And if they should have, why haven't they???? Is it because R lawyers are horrible or that they didn't actually break the law? Be specific, here. Not just say "they did wrong"- what did they specifically do wrong that prosecutors missed? The same powerful government prosecutor group that is getting a number of dumpy people.

And Bill got penalized for lying under oath- you will recall he was impeached.
 
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Conservatives have spent over half a century disproving the claim that we are the stupid party. Now, under Trump, conservatism is embracing, indeed reveling in...stupidity. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/CPAC2019?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#CPAC2019</a></p>— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) <a href="https://twitter.com/BillKristol/status/1101123159984693248?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 28, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Bill's revelations now get credit only for stating the obvious. I guess what he doesn't realize is the Republicans never would have had any power at all if not for stupidity.

Reagan and Dubya were each profoundly stupid. Kristol's enlightenment apparently does not extend to himself.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

So question about attorney-client privilege- which was brought up a few times yesterday...

Question one- you have Client, Attorney A and Attorney B in a room talking. Neither attorney are have each other under whatever it is called, but both do with Client. I would assume that any conversation between either attorney and the client can't be asked for, right? But the conversation between the two attorneys- can that be investigated? And can the second attorney claim that he can not say what was discussed?

Question two- client documents- under normal circumstances, those documents would be protected- clearly. Even if the client gave evidence of breaking the law to the attorney, right? What happens when the documents are about when the client instructed the attorney to break the law on their behalf? Are the documents still protected? If not, what is the legal obligation of the attorney if he is instructed to break the law?

Thanks.

As to question one, attorney work product is also privileged. So conversations and documents prepared could also be shielded by a presumption of privilege, but this presumption is not absolute. The adverse party must show substantial need for records like this and that relevant and non-privileged facts are essential to the preparation of the adverse party's case. This is true in civil litigation and criminal prosecution.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

So dump said Cohen is a liar , yesterday was all lies. Except for the line where he said he didn’t have evidence of collusion. That was the non lie.
Great, thanks Donnie
 
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

What's interesting about the whole Clinton-criminal and bad people BS is that the right is revving up the system to take down a number of prominent Democrats- I just watched a number of snippets that are attacking AOC - many of which are incredibly racists and sexist (sometimes at the same time), and it was not just Faux that was leading the charge. Funny that in the hearing yesterday, she did not start out with some statement, just started out in questioning. Virtually all R's and many D's started with some statement which were all largely pointless- so it was nice to see her cut to the chase and not waste her 5 min.
 
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

Let’s not call him a centrist. He’s not.

I do find it fascinating that Ken Starr investigated for 8 years and somehow could not land the big fish and Mueller's only been going for 2 years and Sic wants the investigation to end.
 
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

I do find it fascinating that Ken Starr investigated for 8 years and somehow could not land the big fish and Mueller's only been going for 2 years and Sic wants the investigation to end.

It's almost as if he's scared of the truth.
 
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

As to question one, attorney work product is also privileged. So conversations and documents prepared could also be shielded by a presumption of privilege, but this presumption is not absolute. The adverse party must show substantial need for records like this and that relevant and non-privileged facts are essential to the preparation of the adverse party's case. This is true in civil litigation and criminal prosecution.

So the follow up question- if that same congressional group subpoenas Allen Weisselberg, can they compel him to testify about the conversations where Cohen was directed to break the law?
 
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

What's interesting about the whole Clinton-criminal and bad people BS is that the right is revving up the system to take down a number of prominent Democrats- I just watched a number of snippets that are attacking AOC - many of which are incredibly racists and sexist (sometimes at the same time), and it was not just Faux that was leading the charge. Funny that in the hearing yesterday, she did not start out with some statement, just started out in questioning. Virtually all R's and many D's started with some statement which were all largely pointless- so it was nice to see her cut to the chase and not waste her 5 min.

There was a lot of people, myself included, who were very impressed with her demeanor relative to the rest of her colleagues both left and right. No grandstanding. No posturing. Just setting up her committee to have the means to subpoena trumps tax returns. It was very well done.
 
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

That's not just "the line", that is literally what happened.

If you're paying a woman after having sex, then how you classify it after that is just parsing the language. He paid a woman for the sex. Period.
 
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

So the follow up question- if that same congressional group subpoenas Allen Weisselberg, can they compel him to testify about the conversations where Cohen was directed to break the law?

They can subpoena him possibly, but you might only get “On advice I counsel...” answers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top