What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45:46: New Year, Same 'Ol Crap.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45:46: New Year, Same 'Ol Crap.

FadeToBlack&Gold said:
Seeing fetishistic howling in the usual dark, far-right caves of the Internet about how a shutdown lasting longer than 30 days allows agencies to easily move forward with permanent layoffs for furloughed employees. Is that true?
Click to expand...

No.

"Reductions in force furlough regulations and SES competitive furlough requirements are not applicable to emergency shutdown furloughs because the ultimate duration of an emergency shutdown furlough is unknown at the outset and is dependent entirely on congressional action, rather than agency action," OPM guidance reads. "The RIF furlough regulations and SES competitive furlough requirements, on the other hand, contemplate planned, foreseeable, money-saving furloughs that, at the outset, are planned to exceed 30 days."
Click to expand...

The righties are confusing Administrative Furloughs, which are used to RIF workers, and emergency furloughs. They are either too evil to note the difference or too dumb to understand it.

BTW, Fetishistic Howling was my college band.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45:46: New Year, Same 'Ol Crap.

Kepler said:
No.



The righties are confusing Administrative Furloughs, which are used to RIF workers, and emergency furloughs. They are either too evil to note the difference or too dumb to understand it.

BTW, Fetishistic Howling was my college band.
Click to expand...

Thanks, I figured that was the case, or else one of the neocon POTUSes surely would've tried it by now.
 
Re: POTUS 45:46: New Year, Same 'Ol Crap.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">due to a large order placed yesterday, we're all out of hamberders. <br>just serving hamburgers today.</p>— Burger King (@BurgerKing) <a href="https://twitter.com/BurgerKing/status/1085213382192627717?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 15, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> The Burger King disses the Lyin' King ;):D
 
Re: POTUS 45:46: New Year, Same 'Ol Crap.

it appears that Clemson ate up all that trash food, so apparently they liked it

great job Mr. President, you saved the taxpayers a bunch of money, use the saved money to buy a couple rolls of razor wire for the wall
 
pokechecker said:
it appears that Clemson ate up all that trash food, so apparently they liked it

great job Mr. President, you saved the taxpayers a bunch of money, use the saved money to buy a couple rolls of razor wire for the wall
Click to expand...

I wouldnt be surprised if you actually thought that's how it works. Just think, we could have the wall fully funded by now if not for all his golf outings.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45:46: New Year, Same 'Ol Crap.

Ah, the old "I had chili for lunch which made me forget the facts" defense? That's so 2017.
 
Re: POTUS 45:46: New Year, Same 'Ol Crap.

Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
So what did Rudy find out?

“ Rudy Giuliani, President Trump's personal attorney, said that he "never said there was no collusion" between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 presidential election.”

https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...JD0ZY8oODXHok6gG7wmDa3lDHLA2yHS8tKaX3N2lpp-Lo
Click to expand...

Yet another example of how dumpy is not fit to be a leader.

Lets assume that rudy is right, and dumpy was not part of it. But he's the guy who chose these people, which tells me that he is really bad at choosing talent to do stuff for him. And he's also responsible for what they do, since they are doing it FOR HIM. So even if he's not directly involved, he's responsible for people who work for him.

One way or another, this guy is not fit to be a leader. Especially for an entire country.
 
Re: POTUS 45:46: New Year, Same 'Ol Crap.

Bringing back up a very old issue for dumpy- https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.1317333aa93a

Which questions whether dumpy inc, which is STILL owned by dumpy, is legally allowed to have the lease of the dump International Hotel in Washington- which has two issues- one- that an elected official is not allowed to benefit by the lease and two- that dumpy inc is taking money in via foreign entities, which is a Constitutional problem.

We don't need collusion to get this guy out. We have a very basic Emoluments Clause that should be enough.

One that people who claim to be anti-globalist should be 100% behind.

How in the world does this guy get away with this??? And if this is not enough to actually impeach a President, what is? This is clearly spelled out in the very base Constitution as a violation.
 
Re: POTUS 45:46: New Year, Same 'Ol Crap.

It would have gotten Obama tossed out.
 
Re: POTUS 45:46: New Year, Same 'Ol Crap.

pokechecker said:
it appears that Clemson ate up all that trash food, so apparently they liked it
Click to expand...

Mentioning the fast food frenzy, Trump joked that his food choices were better than having the first lady make them “some quick little salads.”

And a CNN reporter called that sexist? < sigh >

I'm pretty sure a full meal put out by the WH staff would've started with a salad course. Sexist?
 
Re: POTUS 45:46: New Year, Same 'Ol Crap.

alfablue said:
Bringing back up a very old issue for dumpy- https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.1317333aa93a

Which questions whether dumpy inc, which is STILL owned by dumpy, is legally allowed to have the lease of the dump International Hotel in Washington- which has two issues- one- that an elected official is not allowed to benefit by the lease and two- that dumpy inc is taking money in via foreign entities, which is a Constitutional problem.

We don't need collusion to get this guy out. We have a very basic Emoluments Clause that should be enough.

One that people who claim to be anti-globalist should be 100% behind.

How in the world does this guy get away with this??? And if this is not enough to actually impeach a President, what is? This is clearly spelled out in the very base Constitution as a violation.
Click to expand...
This lawsuit was green lighted by a federal judge.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/28/trump-emoluments-lawsuit-ruling-853272
 
Re: POTUS 45:46: New Year, Same 'Ol Crap.

alfablue said:
Yet another example of how dumpy is not fit to be a leader.

Lets assume that rudy is right, and dumpy was not part of it. But he's the guy who chose these people, which tells me that he is really bad at choosing talent to do stuff for him. And he's also responsible for what they do, since they are doing it FOR HIM. So even if he's not directly involved, he's responsible for people who work for him.

One way or another, this guy is not fit to be a leader. Especially for an entire country.
Click to expand...

And trump's rubes and dupes would see this if they were able to follow this simple logic for more than one step. Like maybe two. But alas, along with being many other things, a good portion of trump's rubes and dupes are no smarter than the president. Or putting it another way, they're idiots.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top