What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah we already know what they are spewing...you are just giving them someone to spew at. Nothing changes either way so just ignore him like you would your drunk racist grandpa at Thanksgiving Dinner.

Ignoring him does nothing. You can... Doesn't mean the rest of us have to.
 
burd will let this go because he's a better man than I outside of his choice in residence and college hockey allegiance, but he'd turn you into a pretzel logically if he cared to.

And no real service member would toss out, "I've defended your right" so childishly and flippantly. gfy

With all due respect.

Correct. My grandfather was a Marine. Never wanted to talk about anything he did in WW2 or Korea.

The biggest braggarts are always the biggest liars.
 
Actually, ignoring me is the best way to avoid having any interactions with me, duh. But you can't help yourself, can you FTLT?

Ignore idiocy and stupidity... Idiocy and stupidity thinks it's ok.
Considering you are both... Big time both... Ignoring you does nothing.
I remember last year with you... Ignoring you was tried... You stayed around. So if you are going to stay... We may as well blast holes in everything you say.
 
"turn you into a pretzel logically"?? How so?

Why do I have to be an attention seeking child? I ENJOY raucous debate. It's that simple. Has nothing to do with the need for attention. I get far more attention than any human could ever need, I don't need to come here to find more. I wish I got less, but apparently having a brain and the ability to use it and think for yourself and not be a sheep attracts alot of negative attention from the sheep out there.

And are you honestly questioning my having served?? "no real service member"???

I'm as real as there is. 4 years of honorable regular Army service, another 3 years of honorable service in the US Army Active Reserves and 1 year as an inactive US Army recruit. I signed up before the start of my Senior year of high school, and apparently that year of waiting around to start up counted towards my 8 year service agreement. And my reupping into the ACTIVE reserves just after the start of the Persian Gulf war apparently makes me a VFW, according to the VA at least.


So F you. LOTS of service members have pointed out to liberals that they defended those liberals right to free speech. Nothing childish or flippant about it.

I don’t think my freedom of speech was in jeopardy when Iraq invaded Kuwait
 
Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

Go take your meds Dubbers...
 
Btw, do you honestly think that your posting that makes either you witty, or me crazy? lol It does neither. It shows you to be very unoriginal for one, and also that you will say anything to try to make me look bad. My guess is you would even lie?

Dubbers... Your posts are what make you crazy. The rest of us don't need to help you with that.
 
Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

Did Russia try to influence our election? Of course they did. As did China and several other countries I am sure. Hey, you do realize that America has actively been trying to influence the elections of dozens of countries over the past could of decades, right? Or are you so naive to believe that America would never do that? Or that America somehow has a right to do it while other countries don't???


What people want when they talk about ending the Russian "collusion" investigation, is for our tax dollars not to be wasted on a witch hunt directed at Trump and Trump alone.

If you are going to investigate sh1t, why not investigate the Clinton's crimes? Oh yeah, you support ALL leftists, no matter how corrupt they are, what was I thinking, sorry.

You did. Hours and hours and hours of drilling Clinton.

Found nothing. So either she did nothing legally wrong, or you righties have the worst lawyers of all time- you can choose that.

BTW, you keep thinking that this russian investigation is against dumpy alone. And it's not. So you must think he's done something wrong if you think he's the focus of the whole thing. Odd that you would jump to that conclusion before the findings come out.

Still, I think you are full of it about your concern about your tax dollars. That's a BS front given the total lack of spending responsibility of all R's since Nixon. You don't care about wasting taxes, and you don't care about welfare- otherwise you would not support a tax break that inflates the debt as much as it does, So stop with your BS- you are 100% full of it.

And the fact that we do it does not make it right. Especially for Russia and China- who were commie foes up- one still is. Not sure why in the world you would be so accepting of foes interrupting our elections just because.

That's pretty weak. Unless you are a comrade yourself.
 
I'm not an idiot or stupid. And I don't need you to agree with that for it to be true.

It's simple, I had some fun ruffling the feathers of some NCHC fans last year in the B1G > NCHC topic, and too many of them couldn't handle it, and followed me around to anywhere else I went in the forum to try to cause trouble and make me look bad, and the forum higher ups had to decide between wasting a ton of time following all of you psychotics around constantly scolding you and advising you to ignore me and let me talk Gopher hockey in the Gopher hockey topic, and to allow me to talk religion in the religion topic, etc., OR

they could just ban me for a month and not have to do much at all otherwise.

They made the right choice. They made the choice I would have made. I would have banned myself. Frick, somehow I thought all of you could be intelligent adults about the whole situation, but wow, you nutbags proved me wrong about that. Bunch of unhinged wackos you all proved to be.



What is appropriate or allowed on a basketball court or on an ice rink, like some trash talking between players, some bumping and jostling under the basket or some checking into the boards, is NOT appropriate in the classroom. What was appropriate, OR ALLOWED at least, at first, in the B1G > NCHC topic, should not have overflowed into other topics. I DID UNDERSTAND THIS and I did NOT bring what went on in there to other topics. I tried in fact, to convince you all to not bring our conflicts and interaction in that specific topic into other topics but you couldn't help it. You talk of obsession, you all showed who the real obsessives were. This was something an intelligent person should understand. But you and a few others who were all butthurt and unhinged by my having ruffled your feathers apparently showed you couldn't understand this simple concept. And many posters here messaged me privately that they recognized exactly that, that I was just having fun with you all, and that you all couldn't figure that out. I had some fans in here. They were a minority, obviously.


Now you can do one of two things, you can purposely follow me around and try to start up trouble with me, in an effort to try to get me banned again, or you can TRY to get along with me, for every one else's sake. I'm recognizing already, that the very little ribbing I've given SCSU about their schedule this season has already got you unhinged and that I may have to try hard to be very very gentle and nice towards all of you very sensitive NCHC fans.



As for blasting holes in everything I say? That sounds biased. What if I say something accurate and true?

There it is. Welcome back Dubbs.
 
Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

ZING!!

@dick_nixon: .@RudyGiuliani They do a lot with antibiotics these days, given that, you know, it is not necessarily advanced. Whatever it may be.
 
Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

Now as a Libertarian, do you think I am not concerned about taxes, how much they are, and how they are spent? You do know what Libertarians think about taxes, right?

Two questions:

First: Are you in the 1%?

Second: Can you not see how painfully obvious it that the "Trump Tax Cuts" were a farce and that there needs to be more taxes paid by the rich to offset essential services that utilize tax monies?


And a follow up, are you also blind to the fact that the current Trump GOP model is actually damaging Libertarian efforts more than any Democratic efforts that Libertarians claim hurt their causes?



An aside not directed to you: What the fu** is so wrong with leaving the world a better place for future generations?
 
Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

"fittest person on the planet"?? You got proof he claimed that?

And I care more about what he does, than what he says or tweets.

Trumps exact words about himself:
"His physical strength and stamina are extraordinary. If elected, Mr. Trump, I can state unequivocally, will be the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency."
So remind me again why Obama was able to walk 250 yards when the healthiest president ever wasn't?

And on the Libertarian front, anymore they are just Republicans that need the crutch of saying they aren't a Republican to defend their views.
 
Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

Ignoring him does nothing. You can... Doesn't mean the rest of us have to.

And what does arguing do? Oh wait...nothing :D

Remember you are on a college hockey message board...you arent at a Town Hall arguing with Trumpers on CNN ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top