POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

[Deleted member 3166]

And what does arguing do? Oh wait...nothing

Remember you are on a college hockey message board...you arent at a Town Hall arguing with Trumpers on CNN

No... I'm on a message board arguing with a moron.
As I have told you before... You don't want to read it... Either put me on ignore or scroll on by.

 

[Handyman]

Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

No... I'm on a message board arguing with a moron.
As I have told you before... You don't want to read it... Either put me on ignore or scroll on by.

Why would I scroll on by...the only thing better than a moron spam trolling a board is when he hooks a bunch of people in and they go hoarse yelling at the wind. I am highly entertained

This clown aint changing his mind and the few people around here who agree with him arent either. Just like with Flaggy sooner or later he will get boared and leave for a while then come back with new lures ready to catch his limit.

It isnt like anyone takes this guy seriously...he is hated more by Gopher fans than he is anyone else. My guess is in a couple days he gets this name banned and we all laugh at what a pathetic loser he is.

 

[Deleted member 3166]

Why would I scroll on by...the only thing better than a moron spam trolling a board is when he hooks a bunch of people in and they go hoarse yelling at the wind. I am highly entertained

This clown aint changing his mind and the few people around here who agree with him arent either. Just like with Flaggy sooner or later he will get boared and leave for a while then come back with new lures ready to catch his limit.

It isnt like anyone takes this guy seriously...he is hated more by Gopher fans than he is anyone else. My guess is in a couple days he gets this name banned and we all laugh at what a pathetic loser he is.

So it's entertaining... But you still want to tell people to ignore the moron... Ok then.
I do find it funny he's branching his crazy out to this side now.

 

[burd]

Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

Why would I scroll on by...the only thing better than a moron spam trolling a board is when he hooks a bunch of people in and they go hoarse yelling at the wind. I am highly entertained

This clown aint changing his mind and the few people around here who agree with him arent either. Just like with Flaggy sooner or later he will get boared and leave for a while then come back with new lures ready to catch his limit.

It isnt like anyone takes this guy seriously...he is hated more by Gopher fans than he is anyone else. My guess is in a couple days he gets this name banned and we all laugh at what a pathetic loser he is.

With all due respect, all any of us do here is indulge in entertainment, whether it's thoughtful posting, people going after morons, or you commenting on people going after morons. Any given thread might have a dozen regular posters, and nobody is changing anyone's mind. What we say here effects no change. It's all entertainment. That's partly why Kepler got out.

That said, there are certainly different ways to be entertained, and I have to say that I enjoy reading what you have to say, Handy, usually for the thought you put into it. Like many here.

 

[Deleted member 3166]

I posted on this side last year, too, but with different intentions than why I posted at the B1G > NCHC topic. There I simply had fun getting all of you riled up. How you couldn't figure out that it shouldn't be taken out into other topics is beyond me?

A lot seems to be beyond you Dubbers... So this is not a shock.

 

[joecct]

Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

Just heard this on the satellite. Seems appropriate.


Isn't it rich?
Are we a pair?
Me here at last on the ground,
You in mid-air,
Where are the clowns?

Isn't it bliss?
Don't you approve?
One who keeps tearing around,
One who can't move,
Where are the clowns?
There ought to be clowns?

Just when I'd stopped opening doors,
Finally knowing the one that I wanted was yours
Making my entrance again with my usual flair
Sure of my lines
No one is there

Don't you love farce?
My fault, I fear
I thought that you'd want what I want
Sorry, my dear!
But where are the clowns
Send in the clowns
Don't bother, they're here

Isn't it rich?
Isn't it queer?
Losing my timing this late in my career
But where are the clowns?
There ought to be clowns
Well, maybe next year

 

[Deleted member 3166]

So why do you consider me a moron Handyman? Honestly? Is it simply because I support our duly elected President, at least at the present time? Is it because I am a Nationalist and not a Globalist? Is it because I found it fun to argue with and rile up a bunch of wound up too tight NCHC fans last season?


Now the Clown label? Well, a clowns purpose is to entertain, and many were entertained by my antics last year, WHEN they were contained in the proper topic. I was also entertained by my antics and by many of the responses by the dupes that took the bait, or by the other clowns who know exactly what I was doing and simply chose to play along. So I won't take offense to that label as long as that is what you meant by labeling me a clown? My suspicion is you did not mean it in the semi-positive way that I stated but in a much more derogatory way? Then I would just question whether you think that anyone that ever "spam trolls" a topic meant for spam trolling such as a topic labeled "B1G > NCHC" has to be looked at in a negative way?

I've certainly got other reasons... But yeah... This right here is enough to call you a supreme moron.

 

[The Rube]

Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

I should have figured you were a Democrat.

I agree with FTLT, and as many on here can tell you, I'm definitely not a Democrat.

 

[Deleted member 3166]

I should have figured you were a Democrat.

And I should have known you'd
A. Try to label me
B. See that label as a negative

You claim to have a brain and think... I have yet to meet anyone who does think that is also a Trump supporter.

 

[Deleted member 3166]

Ok, what are you then? A Republican? A Centrist?

Saying that I should have pegged you as being a Democrat, well, that was sort of meant as a joke. I pray that I was wrong. I hope you are not a Democrat.


And why wouldn't I see being a Democrat as being a negative? Promoting of the RACIST identity politics and PC culture? Open borders? Higher Taxes? More Government control? More regulations? Getting rid of ICE? Wanting to take away people's guns?


Sure, lots of Democrats are bleeding hearts who want to care for the poor and the needy, that's fine, those are good intentions, I'm friends with a lot of Democrats, so they are not heartless people, they are just WRONG.

I don't label myself as part of a party. Those "what are you" tests have flucuated enough from cycle to cycle that I don't attach to any strict group.

As for the rest of your post... You sure don't sound Libertarian... But you sound like you could be Flaggy's new BFF.

 

[The Rube]

Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

I don't label myself as part of a party. Those "what are you" tests have flucuated enough from cycle to cycle that I don't attach to any strict group.

As for the rest of your post... You sure don't sound Libertarian... But you sound like you could be Flaggy's new BFF.

You're playing chess with a pigeon.

 

[Deleted member 3166]

You're playing chess with a pigeon.

Pigeon likely does better.

 

[French Rage]

Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

https://twitter.com/RudyGiuliani/status/1070118915139923968

Guiliani makes a typo so that part of his tweet is a URL, and someone quickly grabbed the domain name. So he claims someone "invaded his text" (whatever the hell that means) because Twitter is part of an anti-Trump conspiracy.

 

[Deleted member 3166]

Ok, out of curiosity, what do you think are the main tenets of the Libertarian platform? I'm genuinely curious.

I'd guess... This

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/281399-5-things-the-libertarian-party-stands-for

 

[Deleted member 3166]

A pigeon that claims he got invited to West Point?

Fixed that for you...
And before you ask... No I do not believe you

 

[French Rage]

Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

Fixed that for you...
And before you ask... No I do not believe you

So he's Ben Carson?

 

[jerphisch]

Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

Those are Trumps words, or is that what Trump said, quoting what his doctor said? Because otherwise you are saying that Trump talked about himself in the 3rd person? I mean, that is possible, I believe he's done that before. But I suspect he was just quoting what his doctor told him.

And "healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency" is not the same as "fittest person on the planet". You do realize this, right?

And Obama was pretty young, so I would question that doctor's bias as well. But for his age, Trump seems to do pretty good. Alot of people his age can't even walk anymore, and alot of people don't make it to that age.
I don't buy that. True, Trump sort of pushed the Republicans in the Libertarian direction, but they were already moving in that direction before he came along, in response to losing so much on the culture war battles. The more the Left moved left and towards Socialism and bigger Govt and more Govt control, the more the Republicans(or I should say, some of them) moved towards the Libertarian way. But most Libertarians don't trust Republicans either, at least not in general. They are just the lesser of two evils. They are fine with Trump and Republican candidates that claim to support the Trump agenda because they are Nationalists, whereas the Republicans that don't support Trump are for the most part Globalists.


Politics in America these days are easy to understand. You have Globalists/Democrats and the older Republicans and you have Nationalists/Libertarians and the newer Trump supporting Republicans.

Centrists are just people who don't understand politics, imo, some because they just don't care, others because they are not well enough informed.

You should probably look in to who wrote the statement Trump's Doctor released, I'll give you a hint. It wasn't Trump's Doctor.

You're forgetting your ((()))s.

 

[Deleted member 3166]

Of course you don't. lol How could you? You have FDS.

Stop trying to make your own syndrome happen... It's not going to happen...

 

[French Rage]

Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

Not in on the joke French Rage? What did Ben Carson claim that was not believed or that was not true?

Relevant to West Point, he claimed to have been offered admission and a "full scholarship" while in middle school. This is not new news.

 

[aparch]

Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

<snip>

Thanks. Nope, didn't know you from the D1 side at all.

Like... Scandinavian flat tax rate? If so, you might be closer to the Dems (who haven't pushed for that other than potentially Bernie Sanders who isn't a Dem) than you want to admit.

As for how he's hurting the Lib movement: isn't one of the hallmarks of the Libertarian beliefs in a free and peaceful open trade? Not trade hamstrung by tariffs and impulse Tweets? The isolationism and push for a border wall seems to be against the Libertarian beliefs as well. You seem blinded by Trump's cries of nationalism as him championing for Libertarian rights. But he's not. He's being racist, whining about trade wars, grifting. All things opposite of Libertarian beliefs.

I was once told by a Libertarian that the US shouldn't need a $15 minimum wage law because under Libertarian beliefs, a great nation like ours would be paying livable wages (more than the existing minimum wage) already.

But what do I know, I'm just a dumb democrat.

...And why wouldn't I see being a Democrat as being a negative? Promoting of the RACIST identity politics and PC culture? Open borders? Higher Taxes? More Government control? More regulations? Getting rid of ICE? Wanting to take away people's guns? ...

I'm taking a swing at this. Who's promoting racist identity politics? Who's claiming that brown people in a caravan from a southern country are disease ridden rapists? Who wants to build a border wall to keep the darker than olive color skinned people out? Hint: It's not Democrats that have their own fear based "news" network. All they have is Rachel Maddow who (IMO) is the Geraldo Rivera of digging up Republican dirt.

Dems don't want open borders. We just want to FIX and ENHANCE the laws and rules we currently have. Abolish ICE? It's one department of 22 under the umbrella of Department of Homeland Security. I'm pretty sure it could vanish tomorrow and the other 21 departments would have no problem handling the duties that were given to ICE when it was formed in 2003. Two departments that could easily absorb ICE (which was spun off from the DHS absorbtion of INS) right now are the US Customs and Border Protection (which was combined from parts of the USDA and INS) and US Citizenship and Immigration (which was the other half of ICE that originally formed the INS). Which, you should be for, smaller government and all that.

We already had laws on the books for immigrating. Come to the wall. Knock on the door. State your case. Get documented as a visitor to the nation. Get assigned a court date. You're on your own to find a place to stay until your court date. If you don't appear, you become wanted. Republicans turned it into: Come to the wall. Knock on the door. Get arrested. Get a free tent to stay in the hot desert. Get a free plane ticket back home. Again: sounds like you want the Democrats "hands off Government" rule versus the Republican's socialist free meals and lodging to illegals.

Wanting to take people's guns away? This sh** again? Umm no. The only reason the Democrats will (eventually) spearhead bills to limit gun sales in the US is because of the Republican's "Profits over People" mentality. Putting it in such a way for libertarians to understand: I don't want my liberty to be a living, breathing, able bodied American to be infringed by the liberties of a gun wielding, PTSD suffering, psycho with an itchy trigger finger. Because I thought Libertarians believe in personal freedoms, but also law-and-order. Again, another point where you should be *against* the Republicans and siding more with the Dems.