What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS: 45.37: The Earth is Flat and the Babies Are Crying

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS: 45.37: The Earth is Flat and the Babies Are Crying

Now, this is a BIG, HUGE NOTICE: What that restaurant did to Sarah is PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE. They notified her in a calm, polite, manner, they would not serve her because of reasons. That is A-OK.

So if 2 women walk into my business wearing "we are lesbians" t-shirts, I can notify them in a calm, polite manner that I will not serve them, that is ok? What if the t-shirts say "all puppies must die" and there are decapitated dogs on the back? Aren't all forms of discrimination unacceptable?
 
Truer words have never been spoken. BOTH sides do this. The left hates the (true) deplorables. But it's okay, because you're hating on the correct people that need to be hated on.


That being said, protest, ridicule, denounce all you want, to whatever you want, just don't intrude on people's personal lives. If they are out to dinner with their family, don't bug them. Now, this is a BIG, HUGE NOTICE: What that restaurant did to Sarah is PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE. They notified her in a calm, polite, manner, they would not serve her because of reasons. That is A-OK.

I wouldn't be okay if a bunch of patrons harassed her into leaving. Nor would I be okay if a bunch of patrons harassed Ms Clinton into leaving a restaurant. Leave it on the ice, so to speak.

Wrong. Can't believe you twisted my argument into your centrist BS.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS: 45.37: The Earth is Flat and the Babies Are Crying

The North Koreans are upgrading their nuclear enrichment facility. Huh.
 
Re: POTUS: 45.37: The Earth is Flat and the Babies Are Crying

Aren't all forms of discrimination unacceptable?
No. We discriminate every day in the decisions we make, and it's necessary. I may choose to buy my groceries at store A instead of store B. That is discrimination.

The only discrimination that is unacceptable is illegal discrimination.
 
Re: POTUS: 45.37: The Earth is Flat and the Babies Are Crying

No. We discriminate every day in the decisions we make, and it's necessary. I may choose to buy my groceries at store A instead of store B. That is discrimination.

The only discrimination that is unacceptable is illegal discrimination.

Correct.

And Scoobs' response was expected; he's that predictable.
 
Re: POTUS: 45.37: The Earth is Flat and the Babies Are Crying

Correct.

And Scoobs' response was expected; he's that predictable.

Predictable how? He said it was ok if it were legal. Well, a lot of things were legal back in the day so it must have been ok. I'm not making a leap.
 
Re: POTUS: 45.37: The Earth is Flat and the Babies Are Crying

Predictable how? He said it was ok if it were legal. Well, a lot of things were legal back in the day so it must have been ok. I'm not making a leap.

Referring to your response to my "hate" post. I apologize for not clarifying that.
 
Re: POTUS: 45.37: The Earth is Flat and the Babies Are Crying

Referring to your response to my "hate" post. I apologize for not clarifying that.

You knew what my argument was and you twisted it into your own ideology. Clinton paid for her hatred. Trump hasn't paid a single cent for his. They are not the same thing.
 
Re: POTUS: 45.37: The Earth is Flat and the Babies Are Crying

So if 2 women walk into my business wearing "we are lesbians" t-shirts, I can notify them in a calm, polite manner that I will not serve them, that is ok? What if the t-shirts say "all puppies must die" and there are decapitated dogs on the back? Aren't all forms of discrimination unacceptable?

It's funny how one side thinks that people discriminating against jerks or a-holes is the same as discrimination based on sexual orientation, color of your skin, or religion.

What is bad about discriminating against people who are just mean and jerks? They can correct their actions if they choose to, but if they choose to be a jerk, go away.
 
Re: POTUS: 45.37: The Earth is Flat and the Babies Are Crying

So if 2 women walk into my business wearing "we are lesbians" t-shirts, I can notify them in a calm, polite manner that I will not serve them, that is ok? What if the t-shirts say "all puppies must die" and there are decapitated dogs on the back? Aren't all forms of discrimination unacceptable?

You might find it easier to grasp if you think in terms of equal protection rather than discrimination. In addition to statutory prohibitions, there are common law classifications and tests that apply to those classifications. Try googling "equal protection classifications" as a start.

Not all cases are equal protection cases, of course, but that' s a good start.
 
Re: POTUS: 45.37: The Earth is Flat and the Babies Are Crying

So if 2 women walk into my business wearing "we are lesbians" t-shirts, I can notify them in a calm, polite manner that I will not serve them, that is ok? What if the t-shirts say "all puppies must die" and there are decapitated dogs on the back? Aren't all forms of discrimination unacceptable?

That's the hill you want to die on, eh? Because racists and sexists and homophobes have faced centuries of discrimination and -- sob -- all they want is EQUALITY?

The reactionaries will pardon me if I don't shed tears for people who now drape their ooga booga in the language of "religious freedom." I wish they would just be honest and declare they believe in the bigotries we've suffered for centuries, and they long for that world.

For the millionth time: they can think any poison their pappy or their pastor poured into their infantile ear. They just can't actively harm anyone with it anymore, because the world has grown past them. They had a nice run for umpteen millenia of bigotry and prejudice. They should be happy they got to wallow in their filth for that long.
 
Re: POTUS: 45.37: The Earth is Flat and the Babies Are Crying

You might find it easier to grasp if you think in terms of equal protection rather than discrimination. In addition to statutory prohibitions, there are common law classifications and tests that apply to those classifications. Try googling "equal protection classifications" as a start.

Not all cases are equal protection cases, of course, but that' s a good start.

Yeah, last I knew, Nazis weren't a protected class.

Oh, I'm sorry, did I just call Sarah a Nazi? Aww man, that's just so crazed and hysterical and uncivil.

I should just make it clear, Sarah may not be a Nazi. She's just following orders.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS: 45.37: The Earth is Flat and the Babies Are Crying

So if 2 women walk into my business wearing "we are lesbians" t-shirts, I can notify them in a calm, polite manner that I will not serve them, that is ok? What if the t-shirts say "all puppies must die" and there are decapitated dogs on the back? Aren't all forms of discrimination unacceptable?

You could kick the women out for wearing offensive t-shirts, but I doubt "we are lesbians" would pass any sort of legal test. In many states, you cannot kick them out for simply being lesbian.

You can discriminate based upon choices and actions, but not intrinsic traits. But that's nothing new, and you likely know that, if you've paid attention to American history and politics at all over the past decade to 50 years.
 
Re: POTUS: 45.37: The Earth is Flat and the Babies Are Crying

You could kick the women out for wearing offensive t-shirts, but I doubt "we are lesbians" would pass any sort of legal test. In many states, you cannot kick them out for simply being lesbian.

You can discriminate based upon choices and actions, but not intrinsic traits. But that's nothing new, and you likely know that, if you've paid attention to American history and politics at all over the past decade to 50 years.

That is not completely true. There are basically three levels of scrutiny, and they do not all apply to classifications based on intrinsic traits. Classifications based on intrinsic traits such as race or gender are subject to the stictest scrutiny, but there are other classifications and other tests.
 
Re: POTUS: 45.37: The Earth is Flat and the Babies Are Crying

That is not completely true. There are basically three levels of scrutiny, and they do not all apply to intrinsic traits. Classifications based on intrinsic traits such as race or gender undergo the highest scrutiny, but there are other classifications and other tests.

I consider religion to be an intrinsic trait because most people are born into theirs. Very few people change their religious affiliation, it's just those that do tend to make the biggest splash in our reported news stories.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top