What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.34: Spy Gate. No Spy. No Gate.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.34: Spy Gate. No Spy. No Gate.

Give people something to vote for and they'll show up.


Telling them, "we'll keep things just as they are" isn't gonna do it. Cause while "as they are" may be working for a lot of people, there are still lots more who need help. Tell them how you'll make their lives better. Give it to them. They'll vote for you.

i.e, tell Iowans you support ethanal, Nodaks you support a strong military defense system, etc. That's what politicians have always done and what we have come to disrespect in them.

What Republicans have learned and applied brilliantly is that you are more apt to succeed if you tell voters what to vote against. And make it scarry. It's pretty clear that doesn't work very well with solid dems, who are more motivated by inspiration, but it is not as simple as telling people how you will improve their lives.

Russ Feingold was a good candidate, IMO, with a liberal but independent history.
 
And that's why Trumpy talked that all along the campaign trail, along with all the anti-immigrant, racist crap. he didn't mean a word of it(a billionaire, gonna crack down on other billionaires?? :rolleyes:) But people believed it. And a lot of them voted on that.

Speaking of anti immigrant-
Soldier calls pizza delivery, pizza man comes to deliver, soldier calls ICE
http://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/390951-pizza-delivery-man-detained-by-ice-after-delivering-to-military-base
 
Re: POTUS 45.34: Spy Gate. No Spy. No Gate.

What was his #1 promise?

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/20...tatements-that-DNC-will-stay-out-of-primaries

Read for yourself.

By the way. This is why Perez went back on his word. It had nothing to do with what Kep said earlier.

Yes, I’m not making this up. Perez’s spokesperson straight up said, Andrew Cuomo’s dad helped Perez start his political career and the two have had a “you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours” relationship for decades, so of course Perez will break his own self-declared rules and endorse Cuomo.
 
Re: POTUS 45.34: Spy Gate. No Spy. No Gate.

By the way. This is why Perez went back on his word. It had nothing to do with what Kep said earlier.

Scoob, I don't even know what you're talking about. I didn't address that question at all. :confused:
 
Re: POTUS 45.34: Spy Gate. No Spy. No Gate.

Scoob, I don't even know what you're talking about. I didn't address that question at all. :confused:

I support Perez as a person, not his (and Rover's) faction. Perez is a smart guy. Clearly I would prefer an even smarter, more liberal, guy. But right now I don't see that guy out there -- do you have a suggestion? It is obviously very hard for that guy to thrive in the current Democratic apparatus.

Also, I don't see Perez as cheating towards the moderates in the way that say DWS did. I do see Perez shutting down cheeseball celeb candidates, and I support that. I don't want our version of Roseanne standing for any public office higher than Hollywood dog catcher.

You said he was shutting down celeb candidates. That was your spin. That's not true. He was scratching Cuomo's back. Exactly what you RAILED and everyone else RAILED people for doing with Clinton vs. Bernie.
 
Re: POTUS 45.34: Spy Gate. No Spy. No Gate.

You said he was shutting down celeb candidates. That was your spin. That's not true. He was scratching Cuomo's back. Exactly what you RAILED and everyone else RAILED people for doing with Clinton vs. Bernie.

AFAIK, Perez shut down Nixon because she's an idiot who wouldn't last ten seconds in a nation campaign. That's literally the first time I ever read anything to the contrary.

If that's why he did it then yes, f-ck him. What's the source? I can tell you it doesn't sound like him from what Dr. Mrs. has told me.
 
Re: POTUS 45.34: Spy Gate. No Spy. No Gate.

AFAIK, Perez shut down Nixon because she's an idiot who wouldn't last ten seconds in a nation campaign. That's literally the first time I ever read anything to the contrary.

If that's why he did it then yes, f-ck him. What's the source? I can tell you it doesn't sound like him from what Dr. Mrs. has told me.

Read the article. It's pretty cut and dry and it's not the only problem with Perez on this issue that they cite.
 
Re: POTUS 45.34: Spy Gate. No Spy. No Gate.

AFAIK, Perez shut down Nixon because she's an idiot who wouldn't last ten seconds in a nation campaign. That's literally the first time I ever read anything to the contrary.

If that's why he did it then yes, f-ck him. What's the source? I can tell you it doesn't sound like him from what Dr. Mrs. has told me.
She's not an idiot as far as I can tell and she's running on a platform you'd agree with over a Republican-lite candidate.
 
Re: POTUS 45.34: Spy Gate. No Spy. No Gate.

Not sure how I got tied into the Tom Perez crowd? My preference by far was for Howard Dean to re-assume the job.

Having said that, we aren't going to know how good or bad the dude is until November rolls around. Dean himself was widely panned as a terrible choice for the job right up until the results from election night 2006 started rolling in. Suddenly he was a genius. :D

I'll also add that while I don't follow every race I haven't seen any egregious misses in terms of recruitment and backing thus far. Seems you've got a mix of people running for office all across the country which isn't a bad thing. Too much is being made of this Cuomo-Nixon match up. May the best person win. Who cares who endorses who, and whoever loses needs to get firmly behind the winner as position wise they aren't that much different.
 
Re: POTUS 45.34: Spy Gate. No Spy. No Gate.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/20...tatements-that-DNC-will-stay-out-of-primaries

Read for yourself.

By the way. This is why Perez went back on his word. It had nothing to do with what Kep said earlier.

Not gonna make excuses for what he did, just gonna point out, that's not at all what his spokesman said.


Be a little more critical of what you read at Kos. I started a number of years ago. They have their biases which slants their articles.
 
Re: POTUS 45.34: Spy Gate. No Spy. No Gate.

Read the article. It's pretty cut and dry and it's not the only problem with Perez on this issue that they cite.

I read the Comments, too. There's (1) a long back and forth about to what extent he can make a personal as distinct from an official endorsement. There's also (2) a lot of Kossite nonsense to the effect that if you have the bad taste to ever prefer a male candidate to a female that means you are ipso facto sexist, because a lot of Kossites plopped off the Grievance Studies conveyor belt in the last couple decades.

(1) although I can see the distinction I don't really buy it. "It's just my personal preference" is a lame thing for someone holding an important org chair to say -- especially someone who has the power of funding life or death. I agree with you that was a cop out. I think Perez may have been trying to finesse it and it blew up on him. He probably does have bills to pay to the Cuomo machine, but you cannot let that spill into that role.

(2) is always a problem on Kos, where the histrionics of black and female identity poutrage is worse than a safe space at Vassar. There are people on Kos who literally can't think without inserting their normative agenda into every conversation, and those people are completely pointless to have a conservation with. Also probably terrible in bed.

Upon further review, the decision on the field is reversed. Perez screwed up by calling the endorsement personal instead of official. He then compounded it BADLY by saying he did it out of loyalty to a faction of the party he is committed to referee impartially. I support calls for him to be replaced. Sorry, Dr. Mrs.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45.34: Spy Gate. No Spy. No Gate.

I don't know why, but it's hilarious to me that Trump wants to air out grievances from the War of 1812. Maybe it's because I'm picturing some aide giving him the Cliff Notes of what happened back then just this morning, and Trump getting all worked up about it over his breakfast McMuffin.
 
Re: POTUS 45.34: Spy Gate. No Spy. No Gate.

Tom Perez does. That's the whole point.

Really not a hill I'm prepared to die on. Nixon has enough $$$ and name recognition that it really doesn't matter. Hell, it probably helps her campaign against an old boys network
 
Re: POTUS 45.34: Spy Gate. No Spy. No Gate.

She's not an idiot as far as I can tell and she's running on a platform you'd agree with over a Republican-lite candidate.

Calling Cuomo Rep-Lite is a big exaggeration.

She is an idiot. Her policy positions are sound but we're in enough trouble without having those positions identified with an idiot messenger.

Jesus F-ck, why don't celebutards stick to the business of fundraising. That's what they're good at. As officials they are completely out of their league. It's classic Shockley Syndrome -- people good at something think they must be good at everything. But they're not; they're idiots at almost every other thing.

KNOW THY F-CKING SELF.
 
Re: POTUS 45.34: Spy Gate. No Spy. No Gate.

Really not a hill I'm prepared to die on. Nixon has enough $$$ and name recognition that it really doesn't matter. Hell, it probably helps her campaign against an old boys network

Unless she runs a vanity Indy campaign. That way lies a GOP governor.
 
Re: POTUS 45.34: Spy Gate. No Spy. No Gate.

Calling Cuomo Rep-Lite is a big exaggeration.
No it isn't, he's a bag man for the financial industry, charter schools, oligarchs, and basically everything else the Republicans want in terms of economic issues. The guy isn't all that distinguishable from Mitt Romney on those issues.

And explain how she's an idiot. She has a history of activism, she has good policies, she explains them well for the most part. It's not like she's your average out of touch celeb.
 
Re: POTUS 45.34: Spy Gate. No Spy. No Gate.

Seriously, F this guy so much

“The World Bank has issued a warning that President Trump’s decision to impose massive tariffs on top US allies could trigger the worst financial crisis since 2008.”
 
Re: POTUS 45.34: Spy Gate. No Spy. No Gate.

Seriously, F this guy so much

“The World Bank has issued a warning that President Trump’s decision to impose massive tariffs on top US allies could trigger the worst financial crisis since 2008.”

It would be pretty funny if, after 70 years of using the World Bank to enslave the rest of the world to the US economy, we were the ones who wound up sanctioned by it. :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top