What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45:27 - Whites and Pink Starbursts Inquire Within

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45:27 - Whites and Pink Starbursts Inquire Within

The Sicatoka said:
No, both are in there. You must've missed the part about me being against a wall. And I've been called far worse that < bleeping > whatever.

(And < bleeping > liberal is the flip side of how some here describe the other end of the political spectrum. Again, mirror.)
Click to expand...

You said there are better uses for federal dollars than the wall. That's an uncontroversial statement to anyone except the Trump acolytes. I actually don't believe you're one of those. Despite not being a fan of his, you're constantly on here running interference for him (as if anything said on here actually makes any difference whatsoever :p <-- jab at all of us). Which tells me that you are a pretty hardcore righty. Who would constantly run interference for someone like Trump--despite not being a fan? Someone who dislikes < bleeping > liberals even more.
 
Re: POTUS 45:27 - Whites and Pink Starbursts Inquire Within

GrinCDXX said:
Despite not being a fan of his, you're constantly on here running interference for him (as if anything said on here actually makes any difference whatsoever :p <-- jab at all of us).
Click to expand...

Not interference, just a different perspective.
Many, too many (save for Scoob), were blind-sided on Nov 8, 2016.
I tried to point out it was possible and was forming up. I'm still hated for that. < shrug >

"Get out; look around; be exposed to what the other side is thinking and doing.
If you don't, if you only just hang out on your one-way street, you'll forget to look both ways before you cross two-way traffic."
Those are words I said to people in 2009 also.
 
Re: POTUS 45:27 - Whites and Pink Starbursts Inquire Within

The Sicatoka said:
Not interference, just a different perspective.
Click to expand...
Hypocrisy is not a perspective.

The Sicatoka said:
"Get out; look around; be exposed to what the other side is thinking and doing.
If you don't, if you only just hang out on your one-way street, you'll forget to look both ways before you cross two-way traffic."
Those are words I said to people in 2009 also.
Click to expand...

Said to who? People blind-sided by the black man winning?
 
Re: POTUS 45:27 - Whites and Pink Starbursts Inquire Within

GrinCDXX said:
A ridiculously vain individual choosing to make himself look ridiculous versus...someone who's black? Seriously?
Click to expand...

Wow. You go to color, race, first.

What I see are two unconventional candidates that the other side was vehemently opposed to because they were unconventional. And when that unconventional candidate won they were painted with all the fears (rational and irrational) of what that now-official would be and do, to the point of becoming irrational in the fear of the official.

I still have my personal firearm contrary to what I was told (repeatedly) in 2009.
I haven't been asked by the Trump-stazi for my papers so far.



And yes, Kep, Scoob, Handy, you may use "Trump-stazi". :)
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45:27 - Whites and Pink Starbursts Inquire Within

The Sicatoka said:
Wow. You go to color, race, first.

What I see are two unconventional candidates that the other side was vehemently opposed to because they were unconventional. And when that unconventional candidate won they were painted with all the fears (rational and irrational) of what that now official would be and do to the point of becoming irrational in the fear of the official.

I still have my personal firearm contrary to what I was told (repeatedly) in 2009.
I haven't been asked by the Trump-stazi for my papers so far.
Click to expand...

Clutch those pearls Francis. (By the way, if you're going to feign outrage, you should probably do it right away--otherwise it's just transparent deflection)

Obama was unconventional? Politically?
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45:27 - Whites and Pink Starbursts Inquire Within

joecct said:
As an on and off follower of The Big Red What (tbrw.info) over the years, I've electronically met Kep. A while back he even posted family pictures including that of his cat, Kepler. They appear to be a nice group of people.

We seem to share the same taste in classic movies and literature, but I will confess that he is more well read than I.

Kep and I are on opposite sides of the political spectrum, but not as far as one would believe. We support bitter hockey rivals (his school gives me gas in the post season) and share in our hatred of the monstrosity in Cambridge.

Once in a while we'll go off on each other, but for the most part I respect his opinions and, I hope, he mine.

In the end we both want our country to be better. We disagree on the road to take and our destinations may be on opposite sides of Coconino County, but we won't be trying to run the other off the road.
Click to expand...

I endorse this message.
 
Re: POTUS 45:27 - Whites and Pink Starbursts Inquire Within

ScoobyDoo said:
No, it really can't. You'd have to change the law and we don't pass laws anymore.
Click to expand...

Yes. We have become a lawless* nation. That's not sustainable.


*If you don't enforce, pass, or modify them, you're ignoring them: lawless.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top