ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: POTUS 45.20 - Doddering Dotards Dodging Detente
So, the ****ing security breach company wins the security contract?
So, the ****ing security breach company wins the security contract?
how much longer do you think Rex Drillerson will stick it out as SoS?
So, the ****ing security breach company wins the security contract?
And the plain old greedy people seem to understand that if dump gets his way, they will all lose a whole lot of money
Yep, always.
In other news, PR denied another waiver that TX and FL got. Red states good, blue territories bad.
Fixed that for you.Red states good, brown territories bad.
Texas and Florida are both pretty brown, in case you've never visited either of them.
Yep, always.
In other news, PR denied another waiver that TX and FL got. Red states good, blue territories bad.
Yeah, I figured as much from you. rufus is just on his four-year seething at the moment and needs the occasional small moments to bring him back to the ground.That's precisely why I said red vs. blue, not brown vs. white.
But let's be honest, Dump doesn't even consider PR part of America. That's the real issue here.
Yeah, I figured as much from you. rufus is just on his four-year seething at the moment and needs the occasional small moments to bring him back to the ground.
Trump might be the only POTUS since 1856 that can't identify any of the states outside of where he owns property. Let's not expect great things from his geographic acumen.
We need to know who was really behind this. Who is really running this? Who has the money to do this? Who would want to keep division in this country? George Soros comes to mind and the likes of him. He and those that we don't know of, are so infiltrated in our government, that they have everything to gain by the saying divide and conquer.
Texas and Florida are both pretty brown, in case you've never visited either of them.
Trump might be the only POTUS since 1856 that can't identify any of the states outside of where he owns property.
OMG, one of my friends on FB is going off the deep end. She posted this today in response to some lunatic website talking about the Vegas massacre:
I'm getting a little worried for her sanity.
Trump might be the only POTUS since 1856 that can't identify any of the states outside of where he owns property. Let's not expect great things from his geographic acumen.
OMG, one of my friends on FB is going off the deep end. She posted this today in response to some lunatic website talking about the Vegas massacre:
I'm getting a little worried for her sanity.
OMG, one of my friends on FB is going off the deep end. She posted this today in response to some lunatic website talking about the Vegas massacre
...
I'm getting a little worried for her sanity.
OMG, one of my friends on FB is going off the deep end. She posted this today in response to some lunatic website talking about the Vegas massacre:
I'm getting a little worried for her sanity.
Plenty of people attempted to pass laws, increase awareness by education, went out en-mass to protest, wrote their elected officials, etc. I am not sure what else they could do?
I think they have become so sophisticated in their ability to predict who will run and annihilate their character that even if someone was an angel they would look bad. I wasn't necessarily a fan of Hillary but if you fact checked what they were selling- from the time she was first lady- you would find that many of the things you believed about her would be wrong. You say something enough times and people begin to believe it is true. They have a whole algorithm that feeds on itself to spread what they want- start with the little blogs who quote each other until there are enough of them the bigger outlets quote it as fact. True for both sides. Many of the politician are real skanks but not all of them are horrible. A fair number of them start out wanting to make a difference except now, with the nutbags blackballing anyone who compromises, they can't
This is a great opportunity, too. I would be fascinated to go through her thinking and see where the strangeness starts. I assume she is still clear that 2 + 2 = 4. We all differ on normative judgments so that's not interesting. There is a spectrum of judgments and the ability to reason that runs from the simple and empirically obvious to the subtle and highly complex (analytic a priori to synthetic a posteriori, Kant would say) and we all fall somewhere on it.
A longitudinal study would be even better. Have these people always been subrational, and politics is just something that gets balled up in it, or does the constant repetition of irrational influences on the internet actually remove people's rationality? Does anybody remember, for example, Flag being more rational back in the day?
This is fascinating. You should, gently, study her.
Texas and Florida are both pretty brown, in case you've never visited either of them.