What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.1 - You take the high road and I'll take the low road

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.1 - You take the high road and I'll take the low road

Not Obama's fault many were fleeing violence in South America.

No, it's not.
It was his job to do his job, which is enforce US law. Crossing the border illegally is, by definition, illegal. It's a law to be enforced.
 
Re: POTUS 45.1 - You take the high road and I'll take the low road

None of the conservative people in here seem upset. I don't think anything the president or GOP is doing upsets them. They falsely try to point out that because they hated Obama with the fire of a thousand suns too, it's all the same.
They are the problem.

I used to be considered a conservative on this board. My positions on taxes are about the only things that have changed in the last few years. Everything else is generally the same.
 
Re: POTUS 45.1 - You take the high road and I'll take the low road

Being left of Clinton doesnt make him the left's equivalent of W. Your opinion on this is skewed by you living in the one party state that is North Dakota.

Like I've said before, I've lived in other states (NY, FL, MN).
 
Re: POTUS 45.1 - You take the high road and I'll take the low road

And objective reality. But I forget that facts have a liberal bias.

Facts don't have biases.

People pick and choose facts that re-enforce their biases (see also: confirmation bias). And I'll be the first to admit as much.
 
Re: POTUS 45.1 - You take the high road and I'll take the low road

Speaking of which, the ACLU and CAIR are planning to file a federal lawsuit against the immigration EO. This should be fun to keep tabs on.
 
Re: POTUS 45.1 - You take the high road and I'll take the low road

I voted for W twice. Now I'm a commie.

I didn't want to pull you in if you didn't want to offer it, but I thought you were one of the conservatives on here as well. It's pretty stark how the goalposts have shifted so dramatically.
 
Re: POTUS 45.1 - You take the high road and I'll take the low road

Intersting point about the election regarding "illegal voting" that the conservatives don't want to discuss is how much voter suppression occurred this time around. Millions of voters were actually impacted by changes made to voting outlets as opposed to people that didn't vote twice just because they were registered in 2 separate locations. It's absolutely mind-boggling what we are witnessing right now.
 
Re: POTUS 45.1 - You take the high road and I'll take the low road

What Trump did is merely a dog whistle to his supporters.
It won't stand up when tested in the courts so it's a complete waste of time and effort.

So you're ok just sitting back and crossing your fingers hoping it will all work out?

****, why not just start rounding up the Muslims like in The Siege? It will all work out right?
 
Re: POTUS 45.1 - You take the high road and I'll take the low road

No, it's not.
It was his job to do his job, which is enforce US law. Crossing the border illegally is, by definition, illegal. It's a law to be enforced.

which is why he deported a record number of people
 
Re: POTUS 45.1 - You take the high road and I'll take the low road

Only alternative facts. You're embarrassing.

FACT: Michigan has 9 titles.
ALTERNATIVE FACT: North Dakota has 8 titles and two of those are since Michigan's last.

North Dakota is a better hockey program based on my alternative fact. (Maize and alfa to detonate in ... three, two, ... )
Am I right or wrong?


I used facts to re-enforce the viewpoint of my biases. We all do it. Some admit it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top