What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Patty Kaz

A

Arafel

New member
I'll take a moment from getting beaten up on Twitter for saying Stauber is an idiot to start smoething new. The Kaz list is out.

Some puzzlers, but

Bach
Baldwin
Campbell
Gabel
Harmon
Howard
Lonergan
Miamo
Tiley
Watts

Congrats to the finalists. I expect Bach, Lonergan, and Watts to be the final three, but who knows.
 
Re: Patty Kaz

vicb said:
I expect Bach, Gabel, and Watts to be the final three, but who knows. ;)
Click to expand...

I know defensemen have a steeper hill to climb to the KAZ Award (which has always baffled me, since Patty was a D!), and expect I will get a number of "full stops" from the WaTTTiger, but I really like Savannah Harmon. She flies under the radar when she needs to, which is a great quality in a D, but comes up HUGE when she needs to, and while the award is in consideration of just the current season, her body of work as Clarkson speaks for itself too.
 
DC78-82 said:
I know defensemen have a steeper hill to climb to the KAZ Award (which has always baffled me, since Patty was a D!), and expect I will get a number of "full stops" from the WaTTTiger, but I really like Savannah Harmon. She flies under the radar when she needs to, which is a great quality in a D, but comes up HUGE when she needs to, and while the award is in consideration of just the current season, her body of work as Clarkson speaks for itself too.
Click to expand...
:D :D

Listen Watts isn't the only good player. She's just the best one.
 
Re: Patty Kaz

DC78-82 said:
I know defensemen have a steeper hill to climb to the KAZ Award (which has always baffled me, since Patty was a D!), and expect I will get a number of "full stops" from the WaTTTiger, but I really like Savannah Harmon. She flies under the radar when she needs to, which is a great quality in a D, but comes up HUGE when she needs to, and while the award is in consideration of just the current season, her body of work as Clarkson speaks for itself too.
Click to expand...

HEAR HEAR! As a Clarkson fan I APPROVE THIS POST! LGT

TonyTheTiger20 said:
:D :D

Listen Watts isn't the only good player. She's just the best goal scorer.
Click to expand...

Fixed your post. ;)
 
Last edited:
vicb said:
Fixed your post. ;)
Click to expand...
You're right, there's no way she could possibly be good at scoring goals and also at other hockey things. I hadn't considered that. It's actually a well known fact that being good at several different aspects of the game of hockey hampers your ability to score goals. This is why noted Best Scorer and Other Hockey Skills Bum Wayne Gretzky never won the Hart.
 
Re: Patty Kaz

Slightly off topic, but since we're on a BC-CCT kick. Local girl Haley Skarupa's last collegiate goal. I think I've forgiven her.

BC 3 - 2 6x6 GW LL Haley Skarupa (35) (Alex Carpenter/45, Kenzie Kent/28) 0:58
 
Last edited:
joecct said:
Slightly off topic, but since we're on a BC-CCT kick. Local girl Hayley Skarupa's last collegiate goal. I think I've forgiven her.

BC 3 - 2 6x6 GW LL Haley Skarupa (35) (Alex Carpenter/45, Kenzie Kent/28) 0:58
Click to expand...
I think I can say with a pretty high level of confidence that that was the most cathartic moment in my sports watching life
 
Re: Patty Kaz

TonyTheTiger20 said:
You're right, there's no way she could possibly be good at scoring goals and also at other hockey things. I hadn't considered that. It's actually a well known fact that being good at several different aspects of the game of hockey hampers your ability to score goals. This is why noted Best Scorer and Other Hockey Skills Bum Wayne Gretzky never won the Hart.
Click to expand...

I'm glad you agree. ;)
 
Re: Patty Kaz

vicb said:
I expect Bach, Gabel, and Watts to be the final three, but who knows. ;)
Click to expand...
Gabel is having a big game versus Yale today, starting with a pure hat trick. Perhaps vicb is onto something. :)
 
TonyTheTiger20 said:
:D :D

Listen Watts isn't the only good player. She's just the best one.
Click to expand...

Lonergan is the best player on that team. Probably the best all around player left in the NCAA. (She) is the reason your precious Watts is what she is.

One important example 8 gwg vs 3.
That's a significant stat not mentioned by her cheerleader.
Another fact is Lonergan does about 70% of the work on that line. Wins puck battles, back checks, knows where to be in the D zone. Sure Watts can score. Has fancy hands not often seen in women's hockey and is a freshman BUT take away the games BEST player and a dominant team around her and what would she be ?
 
Re: Patty Kaz

MrOpinion said:
Lonergan is the best player on that team. Probably the best all around player left in the NCAA. (She) is the reason your precious Watts is what she is.

One important example 8 gwg vs 3.
That's a significant stat not mentioned by her cheerleader.
Another fact is Lonergan does about 70% of the work on that line. Wins puck battles, back checks, knows where to be in the D zone. Sure Watts can score. Has fancy hands not often seen in women's hockey and is a freshman BUT take away the games BEST player and a dominant team around her and what would she be ?
Click to expand...

See someone else who agrees with me that Watts is not the best. Thanks Mr. Lonergan. ;)
 
Last edited:
Re: Patty Kaz

MrOpinion said:
Lonergan is the best player on that team. Probably the best all around player left in the NCAA. (She) is the reason your precious Watts is what she is.

One important example 8 gwg vs 3.
That's a significant stat not mentioned by her cheerleader.
Another fact is Lonergan does about 70% of the work on that line. Wins puck battles, back checks, knows where to be in the D zone. Sure Watts can score. Has fancy hands not often seen in women's hockey and is a freshman BUT take away the games BEST player and a dominant team around her and what would she be ?
Click to expand...

PC sighting?
 
MrOpinion said:
Lonergan is the best player on that team. Probably the best all around player left in the NCAA. (She) is the reason your precious Watts is what she is.

One important example 8 gwg vs 3.
That's a significant stat not mentioned by her cheerleader.
Another fact is Lonergan does about 70% of the work on that line. Wins puck battles, back checks, knows where to be in the D zone. Sure Watts can score. Has fancy hands not often seen in women's hockey and is a freshman BUT take away the games BEST player and a dominant team around her and what would she be ?
Click to expand...
It bothers me to read this. I think I'm one of Lonergan's biggest fans. A certain BC dad who posts here can probably back me up on that.

By the way I feel like we might have spoken at the game yesterday...
 
Re: Patty Kaz

TonyTheTiger20 said:
It bothers me to read this. I think I'm one of Lonergan's biggest fans. A certain BC dad who posts here can probably back me up on that.

By the way I feel like we might have spoken at the game yesterday...
Click to expand...

I don't know if WE spoke yesterday but I KNOW that isn't Mr. Lonergan. I'm 100% sure he would wholeheartedly disagree with that poster. by the way, it's not her vs her. That's what makes the 2 what they are.

please go away and post on the West's thread.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top