What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

pairwise -- post jan 8th

Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

ECAC rules now, no matter what you say, reality rears it's ugly little head!:D
 
Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

1. Quinnipiac (EZAC)
2. St. Cloud State (NACHO)
3. North Dakota (NACHO)
4. Providence (HEA)
5. Omaha (NACHO)
6. Harvard (Ivy)
7. Michigan(BI6)
8. Cornell (EZAC)
9. BC (HEA)
10. Yale (EZAC)
11. Notre Dame (BI6)
12. BU (HEA)
13. Lowell (HEA)
14. Denver (NACHO)
15. Penn State (BI6)
16. Minnesota (BI6)
19. Minnesota State (WCHA)
23. Holy Cross (AHC)
____________________
HEA (5)
Nacho (4)
ECAC (4)
BI6 (1)
WCHA (1)
AHC (1)

BI6 vs NACHO fight to recommence in 3...2...1... GO
 
Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

Don't forget UMD is hovering at 17 despite being at .500. Gonna be fascinating to see what happens if they finally start scoring consistently and put together some wins. If they do that they probably can get their RPI up and get into the tournament.
 
Last edited:
Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

UMD is what St. Cloud was last year. If they can win two more games than they lose the rest of the way they'll be in.
 
Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

willythekid said:
Sorry if you re hoping for a fight, but they are in completely different weight classes. Big6 would need a ref in the middle for protection to get any kind of punch off...:p
Click to expand...

I mean 50% of their conference could be in the tournament by next Friday. Maybe the Nacho's should get some punches in now, before things even out (since one more team for the BI6 gives them the same 1/3 of the conference in the tourni you guys would
 
Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

Why am I arguing for the Bi6? Come on Michigoon fans, this is your time...

Gopher fans can keep hiding under the trailer, till you're ahead of Ped State in the PWR I think its probably the best place for you
 
Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

RL3AO said:
UMD is what St. Cloud was last year. If they can win two more games than they lose the rest of the way they'll be in.
Click to expand...

For this team that feels like a much tougher task than it should be.
 
Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

1. Quinnipiac (EZAC)
2. Saint Cloud State (NACHO)
3. North Dakota (NACHO)
4. Michigan (Bi6)
5. Harvard (Beanpot)
6. Boston College (Beanpot)
7. Providence College (HEA)
8. Boston University (Beanpot)
9. Omaha (NACHO)
10. Notre Dame(HE-W)
11. Lowell (HE)
12. Denver (NACHO)
13. Yale (Ivy)
14. RPI (EZAC)
15. Dartmouth (Ivy)
16. Cornell (Ivy)

17t Penn State (Bi6)
17t Minnesota State (WCHA)
21 Robert Morris (AHC)

WCHA: 1
AHC: 1
Bi6: 1
ECAC: 4
NACHO: 4
HE: 5

Hockey East holds 5/8 of the 2 and 3 seeds. Bi6 continue to prove superior as they might get a second team into the tournament:p. If things stay the way they are Cornell and Dartmouth would be losing spots probably due to the weird ivy scheduling things.

Beanpot teams group pretty tight going into the Beanpot, only one team missings...
 
Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

The four bottom ECAC teams are going to get chewed up in conference play the next few weeks. I think the conference will be lucky to get three teams in after it all shakes out. Actually too much parity
 
Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

LTsatch said:
The four bottom ECAC teams are going to get chewed up in conference play the next few weeks. I think the conference will be lucky to get three teams in after it all shakes out. Actually too much parity
Click to expand...

It will be interesting to see if Yale, Dartmouth, RPI and Cornell can keep up or most fall back to the pack because of parity?
 
Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

UML Puck Hawk said:
I mean 50% of their conference could be in the tournament by next Friday. Maybe the Nacho's should get some punches in now, before things even out (since one more team for the BI6 gives them the same 1/3 of the conference in the tourni you guys would
Click to expand...

hmmm...
 
Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

Is there anyone out there that can help me?
I have been using Air Force as my test case because it comes 1st alphabetically and doesn't have any negative impact wins.
I cannot for the life of me, verify how to determine a team's Opp Opp Win% based on this page:
http://siouxsports.com/hockey/rankings/rpidetails.php?teamid=27

Weighted Win% on the top (0.5954) is based on Weighted Win dived by Weighted GP in the completed contests data

Opp Win% on the top (0.4475) is based on sumproduct of Weighted GP and Win% vs others divided by sum of Weighted GP

I would assume that Opp Opp Win% on the top (0.4721) would be sumproduct of Weighted GP and Opp' Win% divided by sum of Weighted GP but that doesn't work?
Is it a rounding error?

Help!
 
Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

Shirtless Guy said:
Is there anyone out there that can help me?
I have been using Air Force as my test case because it comes 1st alphabetically and doesn't have any negative impact wins.
I cannot for the life of me, verify how to determine a team's Opp Opp Win% based on this page:
http://siouxsports.com/hockey/rankings/rpidetails.php?teamid=27

Weighted Win% on the top (0.5954) is based on Weighted Win dived by Weighted GP in the completed contests data

Opp Win% on the top (0.4475) is based on sumproduct of Weighted GP and Win% vs others divided by sum of Weighted GP

I would assume that Opp Opp Win% on the top (0.4721) would be sumproduct of Weighted GP and Opp' Win% divided by sum of Weighted GP but that doesn't work?
Is it a rounding error?

Help!
Click to expand...

I had my own project the last couple years working on the women's PWR so I've been on this same journey.

I haven't done any for men's, but could it be that OOW% shouldn't be weighted games played but just regular games played? Fortunately I don't have that issue in women's.

Feel free to email me if you want -- grant dot salzano at gmail.
 
Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

Question for the group, in a home and home weekend series, which do you think would be more valuable to a team's RPI a Home Win/Road Tie or a Home Tie/Road Win?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top