Well, Tom Connerty would be an exception
Well, Tom Connerty would be an exception
I'll give the two a bit of a break, since they were both freshmen at the time, but the season when Palmer/Filion was the best the Bucks had, the team had no confidence in either and was a huge factor that pitiful season. I think Heeter/Darlson [sic] are close to being equal, everybody seems to have confidence in both.
IIRC, Markell abandoned Filion pretty early. Then he became waaaayyyyy to dedicated to "Rebound" Joe Palmer.
I'm actually pleased to see him platooning his goaltenders--something he has been reluctant to do. His aversion to doing so in the past this has always puzzled me a little since 1) there were times I thought he overworked the "main" goalie (Mike Betz, anyone?) and 2) he grew up playing for Ron Mason who rotated Mike Liut and Al Sarachman during Markell's years at Bowling Green.
Over the weekend, I caught the Minnesota-Denver games on the dish, and there was some interesting discussion about having a two-goalie system (something the Gophers may have this year). In essence, the commentators argued that by doing so, over the course of the year both goalies stay fresh and prepared for game situations--an important element in case one gets injured or sick, it makes both goalies play better (since they are pushing each other all the time), and opposing teams have to adopt to two different goalie styles for a series.
And just because Dusty doesn't have a win yet doesn't mean I'd move him to "back-up" status. Look at last year's weasel team, when Hogan and Sauer split time. Sauer's win/loss record was abysmal (relative to the overall team record), but, for some reason, the team up north just couldn't find the back of the net when he was in goal.
As for Carlson and Heeter: John, play 'em both against the domers.