What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Obama XXIV: Forward ... pause ... rewind ... play

Re: Obama XXIV: Forward ... pause ... rewind ... play

I dont trust anyone to fix this, collapse is the only way out now. Time for both sides to pay the piper.

Dam it Handy, you know how I hate it when I have to agree with you and yet you keep making sense every once in a while. :mad:
 
Re: Obama XXIV: Forward ... pause ... rewind ... play

I dont trust anyone to fix this, collapse is the only way out now. Time for both sides to pay the piper.

Bankruptcy. I've been saying that's inevitable for a while. Baby Boomers want nothing less.
 
Re: Obama XXIV: Forward ... pause ... rewind ... play

So if Obama loses, will he go quietly into the night?
 
Re: Obama XXIV: Forward ... pause ... rewind ... play

I am all for it...except I think we should just let the South leave this time ;)

We could just split. Course the New Confederacy will have to take on most of the debt since they spend the most money.
 
Re: Obama XXIV: Forward ... pause ... rewind ... play

Hahahaha...no. The day I believe the Dems will tax and NOT spend is the day I am too drunk to function in society permanently. That you think the Dems are going to fix this or that they have the policies to do so proves your lack of any objectivity on the subject. Considering you went to Cornell (and love to pontificate and show us how smart you supposedly are) you would think you would know how big a folly that line of thinking will get you.

I dont trust anyone to fix this, collapse is the only way out now. Time for both sides to pay the piper.
Yep, we're already bankrupt. Defaulting on the debt (and going through sovereign bankruptcy) is the moral and ethical thing to do, which is why I highly doubt Washington will do that. Instead they'll try to pay it down with increasingly worthless dollars and thereby bring the risk of hyperinflation.
 
Re: Obama XXIV: Forward ... pause ... rewind ... play

Yep, we're already bankrupt. Defaulting on the debt (and going through sovereign bankruptcy) is the moral and ethical thing to do, which is why I highly doubt Washington will do that. Instead they'll try to pay it down with increasingly worthless dollars and thereby bring the risk of hyperinflation.
Economically, what happens if the USA defaults on its debts?? Even with the crushing debt following the Revolutionary War, we've never done it.

If that happens, every elected federal official should resign.
 
Re: Obama XXIV: Forward ... pause ... rewind ... play

After reading this thread, I am buying stock in whatever companies supply the materials to manufacture tin foil, because I have a feeling its going to be more valuable than gold after Obama is re-elected.
 
Re: Obama XXIV: Forward ... pause ... rewind ... play

Economically, what happens if the USA defaults on its debts?? Even with the crushing debt following the Revolutionary War, we've never done it.

If that happens, every elected federal official should resign.
I'm not a BK expert, but generally you pay off what portion of the debts your assets allow, restructure your company's finances (government's finances in the case), and hopefully recover and become productive again. Of course your creditors are going to take it on the chin since they won't be getting all their money back, but they have to live with the risk they took when lending you money. I think the foreign countries that are lending us money now realize that we're paying them back with more borrowed money, that the dollars we're paying them back with are generally decreasing in value, and I wonder how long they'll put up with that. They're going to start wanting to be better compensated with higher interest rates on the the Treasuries they buy. The dollar may very well lose it's status as the world reserve currency in the process, which will really cause it to be devalued. And I think that's what Washington wants; pay back the debt with increasingly worthless dollars. We'll all pay through the nose for that but Washington will find someone other than themselves to blame. I don't think they'll choose to default on the debt.
 
Re: Obama XXIV: Forward ... pause ... rewind ... play

Defaulting on its debts is an unnecessary disaster and a classic case of the cure being worse than the disease. The US has the means to pay off its creditors, so I'm not sure how exactly an asset selloff would work (would we give the Chinese the Statue of Liberty for example?). Next, most US debt is owned by Americans and American institutions, so when the securities they hold all of a sudden lose 50-75% of their value you're going to have mass panic. Furthermore borrowing costs would skyrocket on everything and a global depression would be sure to follow as US Treasury securities are held worldwide as the so called "risk free" investment of the world. All this to accomplish...what again?

The country's budget deficit isn't nearly as unmanagable as some would like to make it. But its going to require some work. A 1T deficit can be closed with a combination of 1) tax hikes on top earners, 2) military budget cuts, 3) domestic non military cuts, and 4) economic growth and its effect on tax receipts. For simplicity's sake allocate the 1T needed equally amongst those 4 items. Then if you want to move onto actually earning surpluses to pay down the already accumulated debt, means test the entitlement programs.
 
Re: Obama XXIV: Forward ... pause ... rewind ... play

Defaulting on its debts is an unnecessary disaster and a classic case of the cure being worse than the disease. The US has the means to pay off its creditors, so I'm not sure how exactly an asset selloff would work (would we give the Chinese the Statue of Liberty for example?). Next, most US debt is owned by Americans and American institutions, so when the securities they hold all of a sudden lose 50-75% of their value you're going to have mass panic. Furthermore borrowing costs would skyrocket on everything and a global depression would be sure to follow as US Treasury securities are held worldwide as the so called "risk free" investment of the world. All this to accomplish...what again?

The country's budget deficit isn't nearly as unmanagable as some would like to make it. But its going to require some work. A 1T deficit can be closed with a combination of 1) tax hikes on top earners, 2) military budget cuts, 3) domestic non military cuts, and 4) economic growth and its effect on tax receipts. For simplicity's sake allocate the 1T needed equally amongst those 4 items. Then if you want to move onto actually earning surpluses to pay down the already accumulated debt, means test the entitlement programs.
I think Kepler would sell them what he calls the Confederacy.
 
Re: Obama XXIV: Forward ... pause ... rewind ... play

Defaulting on its debts is an unnecessary disaster and a classic case of the cure being worse than the disease. The US has the means to pay off its creditors, so I'm not sure how exactly an asset selloff would work (would we give the Chinese the Statue of Liberty for example?). Next, most US debt is owned by Americans and American institutions, so when the securities they hold all of a sudden lose 50-75% of their value you're going to have mass panic. Furthermore borrowing costs would skyrocket on everything and a global depression would be sure to follow as US Treasury securities are held worldwide as the so called "risk free" investment of the world. All this to accomplish...what again?
Definitely agree with all of this.

The country's budget deficit isn't nearly as unmanagable as some would like to make it. But its going to require some work. A 1T deficit can be closed with a combination of 1) tax hikes on top earners, 2) military budget cuts, 3) domestic non military cuts, and 4) economic growth and its effect on tax receipts. For simplicity's sake allocate the 1T needed equally amongst those 4 items. Then if you want to move onto actually earning surpluses to pay down the already accumulated debt, means test the entitlement programs.
The problem is that the more of 1, 2, and 3 that you do, the less of 4 you get - and the difference could be enough to negate any gains you made from 1, 2, and 3 in the first place. Even if you're not a cool-aid drinking Keynesian, you have to admit that if you cut government spending by hundreds of billions (as you're contemplating), the economy is going to notice.
 
Re: Obama XXIV: Forward ... pause ... rewind ... play

I think Kepler would sell them what he calls the Confederacy.

See, that's a little too broad. First of all anywhere boring needs to go. That means most of the mid west. Then deal places that cost more than they contribute and have little hope of ever turning around (Kentucky, West Virginia, Arizona, Mississippi). Keep Texas for oil and cartoonish politicians, Florida for beaches, Georgia because my wife would kill me if I advocated its sale, and Tennessee because every great country needs bourbon & hillbillies, and I already sold off Kentucky.
 
Re: Obama XXIV: Forward ... pause ... rewind ... play

Economically, what happens if the USA defaults on its debts?? Even with the crushing debt following the Revolutionary War, we've never done it.

If that happens, every elected federal official should resign.
Nobody really knows what would, or wouldn't happen if/when the USA eventually defaults on its debts. It would be such a massive event with so many ripple effects. About all we know is it wouldn't be good, to put it mildly. Just how bad is open to speculation.
 
Re: Obama XXIV: Forward ... pause ... rewind ... play

See, that's a little too broad. First of all anywhere boring needs to go. That means most of the mid west. Then deal places that cost more than they contribute and have little hope of ever turning around (Kentucky, West Virginia, Arizona, Mississippi). Keep Texas for oil and cartoonish politicians, Florida for beaches, Georgia because my wife would kill me if I advocated its sale, and Tennessee because every great country needs bourbon & hillbillies, and I already sold off Kentucky.
So, if we get sold off here in Arizona, then I guess we get out of being responsible for all the after effects of the default by teh USA, since we're no longer a part anymore? That sounds kinda tempting!
 
Re: Obama XXIV: Forward ... pause ... rewind ... play

Yeah, except you're most likely to get sold to Aztlan separatists. That probably won't work out too well for you.
 
Back
Top