What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Obama V: For Vendetta

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

How about a newspaper from a heavily Democratic city:

http://detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090215/OPINION03/902150307/1008/OPINION01

Regardless, it's no secret the Dems would like to silence talk radio. It might not be high on their priority list right now, but they're still working on it. The credentials of the new FCC Diversity Czar aren't exactly balanced.

Better source. Much better, but it's still an opinion piece.

That said, given Obama's own words, I wouldn't doubt that he's interested in the Orwellian "Fairness Doctrine." Wrapping himself in the first amendment ("these stations are SILENCING people who support ME!"), the administration will try to invoke the "Fairness Doctrine," which won't lead to liberal talk shows suddenly appearing on the radio. Not that that's what the goal is anyway.

Why isn't liberal talk radio on the air, for the most part? It's not because these stations are cutting them out. It's because no one wants to listen to it. Look at Air America. Their stations are exclusive, for the most part, and they languish in the ratings. Why would these stations voluntarily put programs on that no one will listen to?

It's all about the ratings for these stations. If they made money airing liberal talk radio, they'd do it. They don't. If they're forced to devote half of their airtime to it, they'll to the financially smart thing - and change formats.

The "Fairness Doctrine" isn't about admitting liberal ideas to talk radio. It's about shutting up conservative talk radio. And it will be done in the name of the First Amendment. Ignorance is strength. Freedom is slavery. Silencing dissent is free speech.

And if you think conservatives are angry now, you ain't seen nothin' yet.
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

Talk radio is a (literally) dying medium. If talk radio audiences represented the country as a whole, Ron Paul would be President and Tom Delay would be King.

As far as why liberal radio hasn't taken off, frankly its a lot more dull. Liberals aren't as good at pushing hot button issues and a conspiracy theory a day as conservatives are. Hell, the far lefties are still pushing 9-11 theories, while the righties have moved to way more contemporary outrages like Obama's Kenyan birth (complete with a fake birth certificate circulating the net, can you picture Air America coming up with something like that?).

So, Dems will continue to dominate the net, since their voters are usually younger than 70, and everybody knows old people have trouble with technology ;) so I wouldn't worry about conservatives catching up. Likewise, old people still like the radio and since they lean conservative righties will still dominate that ever shrinking audience.
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

Talk radio is a (literally) dying medium.

If I wish it to be so it must be true. If I wish it to be so it must be true. If I wish it to be so it must be true. If I wish it to be so it must be true. If I wish it to be so it must be true.

Talk radio thrives under unpopular liberal presidents.
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

If I wish it to be so it must be true. If I wish it to be so it must be true. If I wish it to be so it must be true. If I wish it to be so it must be true. If I wish it to be so it must be true.

Talk radio thrives under unpopular liberal presidents.

Ha. The clown comes through with another laugher, doesn't he?

If talk radio were dying as he insists, one wonders why Obama spent so much time earlier this year trying to have a (urinating) contest with Rush. Kind of like how if Sarah Palin is as insignificant as the libs insist, why they keep giving her attention.
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

If I wish it to be so it must be true. If I wish it to be so it must be true. If I wish it to be so it must be true. If I wish it to be so it must be true. If I wish it to be so it must be true.

Talk radio thrives under unpopular liberal presidents.

Talk radio audiences aren't older and are representative of the population?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Listeners to talk radio also tend to be older than those listening to other formats. Only 5% are between the ages of 18 and 24, and 80.2% are over the age of 35.

According to the Pew Research Center for People & the Press, conservative Republicans make up 28% of talk radio’s audience, compared to only 17% of the general public who identify themselves as conservative Republicans. Moderate Republicans make up 13%, moderate Democrats make up 13% and liberal Democrats make up 20% of talk radio’s audience.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Just to bring you back home reality, why was Obama elected despite strenuous oppositon by right wing talk radio? :confused:
 
Last edited:
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

Ha. The clown comes through with another laugher, doesn't he?

If talk radio were dying as he insists, one wonders why Obama spent so much time earlier this year trying to have a (urinating) contest with Rush. Kind of like how if Sarah Palin is as insignificant as the libs insist, why they keep giving her attention.

I agree, talk radio isn't dying. Local content programming is dying and syndication is growing.

Sirius/XM may be dying for financial reasons. Same with print media, a decided liberal speakpiece. Internet outlets are a dime a dozen, but most large conglomerates are liberal.

Cable/satellite tv is in no danger and the ratings don't lie. Demographics are not entirely limited to conservative retirees waiting for their death pill. GE has more channels on the dial than any conservative outlet like Fox and still suffers in the ratings game.
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

Ha. The clown comes through with another laugher, doesn't he?

If talk radio were dying as he insists, one wonders why Obama spent so much time earlier this year trying to have a (urinating) contest with Rush. Kind of like how if Sarah Palin is as insignificant as the libs insist, why they keep giving her attention.

Ummm...because you want Sarah Palin and Rush Limbaugh to be the face and voice of the GOP instead of more moderate people with wider appeal.

Look Red Cloud, I realize you're not very bright, but even you must be able to see a set up when it appears. Fat, racist, ex-con, 4 times married Limbaugh is exactly who I want representing the GOP - unless we can somehow get you two stooges to do it. :D :D :D
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

If talk radio were dying as he insists, one wonders why Obama spent so much time earlier this year trying to have a (urinating) contest with Rush. Kind of like how if Sarah Palin is as insignificant as the libs insist, why they keep giving her attention.

This is too easy to answer..... It's because none of the people (Rover, Obama, media) mentioned are very bright. Like so many in (and in Rover case interested in) politics, they focus on the easy targets instead of real issues. :(
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

This is too easy to answer..... It's because none of the people (Rover, Obama, media) mentioned are very bright. Like so many in (and in Rover case interested in) politics, they focus on the easy targets instead of real issues. :(

I think its more of an issue of who makes up the conservative base. With few exceptions, its either 1) old people, 2) super wealthy people, or 3) people who aren't getting laid. :D Now for example we know Patman and Red Cloud aren't old or wealthy, so lets just stop there...

To make it simpler for my conservative friends, if there was one person who would sum up what the usual talk radio listener is like, that person, or better yet, character, is Grampa Simpson (recall the 'Old Man Yells At Cloud' headline). Its fine to think and talk like that if you're in your 80's. When you're doing that, but you're only 30, that's a problem that really needs to be addressed, and quickly IMHO. :cool:
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

My guess is better than Obama, really

Obama, Bush (either one), Reagan, you name it!

Don't think I could have done as good a job as Clinton, although I would have stayed away from the overweight interns FWIW...;)
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

As far as why liberal radio hasn't taken off, frankly its a lot more dull. Liberals aren't as good at pushing hot button issues and a conspiracy theory a day as conservatives are.

Randi Rhodes is nearly as much of a hair-on-fire eejit as the Rush-Levine-Savage Jugendbund. The fact that her show is so unpopular while Hate Radio flourishes only says positive things about the difference between the left and right mainstream at this juncture of history.

In the 70's, the left were the subliterates and the right were the intellectuals. Now it's the opposite. In 30 years it will have flipped back. The circle of life... :p
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

Randi Rhodes is nearly as much of a hair-on-fire eejit as the Rush-Levine-Savage Jugendbund. The fact that her show is so unpopular while Hate Radio flourishes only says positive things about the difference between the left and right mainstream at this juncture of history.

God does she suck.
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

Don't think I could have done as good a job as Clinton, although I would have stayed away from the overweight interns FWIW...;)

Everyone you turn down is one you'll never have.
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

If this is true, file it under how to lose an election in 3 easy steps.




I rest my case!!!:D :D :D

I think its more of an issue of who makes up the conservative base. With few exceptions, its either 1) old people, 2) super wealthy people, or 3) people who aren't getting laid. :D Now for example we know Patman and Red Cloud aren't old or wealthy, so lets just stop there...

To make it simpler for my conservative friends, if there was one person who would sum up what the usual talk radio listener is like, that person, or better yet, character, is Grampa Simpson (recall the 'Old Man Yells At Cloud' headline). Its fine to think and talk like that if you're in your 80's. When you're doing that, but you're only 30, that's a problem that really needs to be addressed, and quickly IMHO. :cool:
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

I rest my case!!!:D :D :D

I just get a kick out of how you think that if you ridicule someone else it somehow makes you right.

Either that, or you don't have any facts to back you up so thats all you have left.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top