What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Obama 9 -- Its Been a Whole Year Now

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Obama 9 -- Its Been a Whole Year Now

Again though, the left lost a tremendous opportunity to go for rail or something else... but then again that's because they're not about improving the world with big ideas. They're about control and self-congratulation.

Funny, you could easily say the same thing about the right. Why didn't you?
 
Re: Obama 9 -- Its Been a Whole Year Now

IMO... the roads are something we should be funding to maintenance levels regardless of how we label the bill. the fact we need to call it "stimulus" is stupid in its own right but its helpful when you're trying to prove "jobs".

Again though, the left lost a tremendous opportunity to go for rail or something else... but then again that's because they're not about improving the world with big ideas. They're about control and self-congratulation.

They're not? I think you should look into the latest round of TIGER grants from the DOT, just as an example.
 
Re: Obama 9 -- Its Been a Whole Year Now

They're not? I think you should look into the latest round of TIGER grants from the DOT, just as an example.

small time... as i said, dems wasted an opportunity when the country could have said "hell, why not try it... this probably should work".

They had a ton of political capital but they blew it giving themselves pats on the back and feeding their own political backers with the "stimulus" or as better put "democratic party feeder organization 'Christmas'".
 
Re: Obama 9 -- Its Been a Whole Year Now

small time... as i said, dems wasted an opportunity when the country could have said "hell, why not try it... this probably should work".

They had a ton of political capital but they blew it giving themselves pats on the back and feeding their own political backers with the "stimulus" or as better put "democratic party feeder organization 'Christmas'".

Small time? They're piloting this as a way to completely reform the way we fund transportation in this country. That's not small time, under any definition.

Look, if you were looking for the second coming of the interstate highway act, that's great - I'd love to see something of that scale, too - but that's not going to work as stimulus. It's not fast enough. Now that it's clear we a) have the need for the infrastructure, and b) have the need for more economic investment, and c) have a transportation bill that's expired and in need of renewal, we'll see some movement.

I'm sorry, but to simply dismiss this as small time shows no real understanding of what is realistically possible.
 
Re: Obama 9 -- Its Been a Whole Year Now

And Clinton's and Obama's and Bush I's, and Reagan's and Carter's. etc. etc. etc.

The last president to reside over a balanced budget was Ike. I don't hear anyone clamoring for tax rates to go back up to what they were when he was in office.
 
Re: Obama 9 -- Its Been a Whole Year Now

:confused: What about Clinton?

Yes, he presided over balanced budgets in FY 99 and FY 00. I should have said the last president to leave office presiding over a balanced budget was Eisenhower, but I see that's even incorrect. The last president to leave office with a balanced budget was Coolidge.

Of course, rolling taxes back to what they were under Clinton is Socialism, so I can't imagine what would happen if taxes were rolled back to those levels.
 
Re: Obama 9 -- Its Been a Whole Year Now

Whatever it is, I'm sure it's an -ism and we should be very, very afraid of it.

"-Ism's in my opinion are not good. A person should not believe in an -ism, he should believe in himself. I quote John Lennon, "I don't believe in Beatles, I just believe in me." Good point there. After all, he was the walrus. I could be the walrus. I'd still have to bum rides off people."
-Ferris Bueller
 
Re: Obama 9 -- Its Been a Whole Year Now

Again though, the left lost a tremendous opportunity to go for rail or something else... but then again that's because they're not about improving the world with big ideas. They're about control and self-congratulation.

They did go for a lot in rail. Not as much as China has been doing, another area where they'rer taking the initiative and kicking our azz, but they did include a lot in the bill for high speed rail, and existing rail systems.

And what did they get for their efforts? Republicans making up some BS story and then trumpeting it loudly in the media about them for wanting to construct a rail line from Los Angles to some hoo-ahhouse in Nevada.

Yes, it's time for the Democrats to change the tone in Washington. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Re: Obama 9 -- Its Been a Whole Year Now

Read in the paper today (or yesterday) that medical insurance is going up in California 39% or so because the healthy people are dropping their insurance.

Fun.
 
Re: Obama 9 -- Its Been a Whole Year Now

Read in the paper today (or yesterday) that medical insurance is going up in California 39% or so because the healthy people are dropping their insurance.

Fun.

Blue Cross Blue Shield (the company in question) donated to Democrats' campaigns over Republicans' by a 4-1 margin. Now tell me who was in the pockets of big Insurance?

And why should healthy people be forced to carry insurance?

And furthermore, why is it a problem that the company is raising rates, can't people choose a different company? Oh they can't? Whose idea was that?
 
Re: Obama 9 -- Its Been a Whole Year Now

And why should healthy people be forced to carry insurance?

Because you can be healthy one day and suddenly have an ailment tomorrow...like, say, a brain tumor. That's why it's called insurance. They don't give life insurance policies to dying people. On September 26 I was perfectly healthy. On September 27 things changed slightly. Because I had health insurance, I could afford an operation that saved my life. Without insurance, I would either be dead, be paying the hospital bill for the rest of my life or be forced to file bankruptcy.
 
Re: Obama 9 -- Its Been a Whole Year Now

Blue Cross Blue Shield (the company in question) donated to Democrats' campaigns over Republicans' by a 4-1 margin. Now tell me who was in the pockets of big Insurance?

And why should healthy people be forced to carry insurance?

And furthermore, why is it a problem that the company is raising rates, can't people choose a different company? Oh they can't? Whose idea was that?
1. It was Anthem I was referring to.

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/feb/04/business/la-fi-insure-anthem5-2010feb05

2. I don't really care who donated what to who. I don't like the Democrats plan anymore than the Republican plan.

3. Healthy people should be required to carry insurance if they're going to cost the taxpayer money by not carrying insurance. Make sense? I have to have car insurance to drive a car. I have to have homeowner's insurance to finance a house.

4. I imagine there are more than one company in California that they can get insurance from. They may have to find a new job to afford that insurance because your choice is limited by your employment, but, get a new job. Also, the reason you can't cross state lines is because states have different regulations for medical insurance. That's actually not a bad thing because states then compete with one another for the type of health care they are offering their citizens, IMO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top