I can reiterate.The lens I'm looking through is, simply by virtue of a much weaker league, the record will be better and - hopefully - the conference tourney results will be better. I think we'll really see what the trajectory looks like once Dawes/Mattson have time to recruit a full class of "Dawes guys". There were some late adds after Dawes was hired (see: Fancy, Ocean) but it's certainly not a full class of Dominick's recruits.
Bog, no one really engaged with my thoughts on final standings. I'd be interested to hear what you think (objectively). In my view, a third place finish in a weaker league coming off three straight 2nds in one of the best leagues in the country is in no way a sign of any kind of progress.
New league, new coach, new system. I see improvements, and areas that will require more experience.
Babson was a loss, USM was one more mistake from a tie at the end, UMD was not an easy game, and they are not a top notch team. Castleton can be a tough opponent, and Keene (with more games played) is decent. Plymouth has apparently resolved their problems somewhat, and they were better than the score indicated when NU played them. So, NU was 2nd last year, but tied in points with Babson. So it isn’t unreasonable to see Babson ahead at end of regular season. Also not unreasonable that Plymouth is very near the top of the LEC at end of year.
If this was Dawes Year 2, much more likely that NU is at the top, but a couple more stumbles against the better teams would have a big impact.
Today will be a good measure, and next weekend even better.